This response of Osmanthus's was posted way after my last posting on that thread and looks ridiculously out of place and was obviously written in a rage. What is interesting is that none of the posters (with the exceptions of Baal and Zaephon) there quoted anything of what I wrote or even responded coherently.You're pathetic, Ansar. Fair enough if you want to criticise Islam for its faults. We all do that and there is plenty of material for sure. However people like you sort of give me the impression that you sneak off home at night rubbing your hands together like Monty Burns and go to sleep with a smirk on your face happy that you have managed to scrape through another day without admitting that Islam is not 100% pure, unadulterated evil.
Now it that's what you get off on then whatever, but for anyone less obsessive about the topic it does make you seem rather troppo. Perhaps monomaniacal would be a better word if you aren't familiar with Australian colloquialisms. I have no emotional attachment to Islam so I have nothing to defend here, but on the other hand I have no reason to deliberately avoid seeing any good in it at all. This is particularly the case when you take into account the diversity of opinions within Islam.
Yes, the book on which it is based is a pile of insane medieval twaddle and the bloke who started it was a thoroughly nasty individual but he did **** up occasionally and throw in a few little good bits. Nobody's perfect.
http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index ... pic=4794.0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
On yet another thread Kafirist wrote:
Now what was so terrible about this Kafirist? Please tell me because I would really like to know. That is if you are someone who doesn't follow along with the crowd like you did there. Come on now . . . I know you can do better than do a youtube link as a response.Found it: http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index ... #msg124567" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Wow that was just terrible!