Really it's the most excellent observation & suggestion one can make in one line.Idesigner wrote:Only way Arundhati can understand Talibans is by wearing burkha.

Really it's the most excellent observation & suggestion one can make in one line.Idesigner wrote:Only way Arundhati can understand Talibans is by wearing burkha.
I would agree! Arundhati was brought up as a christian in Kerala, after her Bengali Hindu father committed suicide, and her mother being a Syrian Christian. I think she is an atheist. I hope she channels her talents into writing novels instead of meddling in the mine-ridden religious politics. May be that she lost her writing talents forever. If that is true, that would really be a loss to India.viduur wrote:Really it's the most excellent observation & suggestion one can make in one line.Idesigner wrote:Only way Arundhati can understand Talibans is by wearing burkha.
You really have a very soft corner for this lady, who have a very charming face & beautiful eyes.Yohan wrote:I would agree! Arundhati was brought up as a christian in Kerala, after her Bengali Hindu father committed suicide, and her mother being a Syrian Christian. I think she is an atheist. I hope she channels her talents into writing novels instead of meddling in the mine-ridden religious politics. May be that she lost her writing talents forever. If that is true, that would really be a loss to India.viduur wrote:Really it's the most excellent observation & suggestion one can make in one line.Idesigner wrote:Only way Arundhati can understand Talibans is by wearing burkha.
Actually I don't! I think she is a loose cannon!!viduur wrote:You really have a very soft corner for this lady, who have a very charming face & beautiful eyes.Yohan wrote:I would agree! Arundhati was brought up as a christian in Kerala, after her Bengali Hindu father committed suicide, and her mother being a Syrian Christian. I think she is an atheist. I hope she channels her talents into writing novels instead of meddling in the mine-ridden religious politics. May be that she lost her writing talents forever. If that is true, that would really be a loss to India.![]()
I also admire her persona but not the extremely anti-Hindu & ultra leftist philosophy adopted by her.
Just see how she criticised US in the post 9/11 scenerio....I could really never read it completely.
This beautiful lady becomes disgusting sometimes.....
Caste system is an embarrassing topic for Hindus to discuss. Some become defensive, some become dismissive, some blame the others, and so on, the varieties one encounters are endless. Whatever the posturing they adopt, and whatever the origins of caste system, they live in a society of their creation which measures a man based upon his birth as per the laws of their religion. So they simply can't deny it doesn't exist.viduur wrote:Actually Caste System is nothing Hinduism but anti-Hinduism only. I think following equation summarise it very well-
Hinduism = Hindu Religion -Caste System
--------------
ManuSmiriti has no relevance in modern India. ------ Being an agragarian society, Cow & its progeny provided maximum support to Indian econmy till recent past. This may be the reason why most of the Indians ( not only Hindus) are emotional about treating cow at par with other animals. Outside India, Hindu kids also enjoy beef & beef products like all others.
And maybe, Taliban will treat them so nice that they will convert to Islam (if the above lady in Hijab haven't already) like what a UK journalist did.expozIslam wrote:She can give company to this lady
Taliban would love to have her.
Just to burst your bubble.Yohan wrote: Caste system is an embarrassing topic for Hindus to discuss. Some become defensive, some become dismissive, some blame the others, and so on, the varieties one encounters are endless. Whatever the posturing they adopt, and whatever the origins of caste system, they live in a society of their creation which measures a man based upon his birth as per the laws of their religion. So they simply can't deny it doesn't exist.
Lol...it was really funny. I watched few more videos by 4manshow, its quite surprising to hear bollywood songs there.Agnostic wrote:I don’t understand the language much. My wife translated some of it. I think those who understand Urdu will find it amusing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKDEfYe33_0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Hinduism is an evolution, and not a revolution like many other religions.Things are moving in positive direction at slow pace to sustain the creative impulse & potential of the best creature of the creator.Moving too fast in positive direction can also result in inequillibrium & instabilty, as being witnessed by the American societies after the recent Global Financial crisis.Yohan wrote:Caste system is an embarrassing topic for Hindus to discuss. Some become defensive, some become dismissive, some blame the others, and so on, the varieties one encounters are endless. Whatever the posturing they adopt, and whatever the origins of caste system, they live in a society of their creation which measures a man based upon his birth as per the laws of their religion. So they simply can't deny it doesn't exist.viduur wrote:Actually Caste System is nothing Hinduism but anti-Hinduism only. I think following equation summarise it very well-
Hinduism = Hindu Religion -Caste System
--------------
ManuSmiriti has no relevance in modern India. ------ Being an agragarian society, Cow & its progeny provided maximum support to Indian econmy till recent past. This may be the reason why most of the Indians ( not only Hindus) are emotional about treating cow at par with other animals. Outside India, Hindu kids also enjoy beef & beef products like all others.
I understand your aspirations for Hinduism to cleanse itself of caste system, no matter how difficult it would be. About 97% of marriages continue to be within the same caste, counter that notion. Caste system has remained in force in every corner where modern laws can't penetrate, which is actually most of the social, communal, and religious workings of Hindus. This situation is not much different from Islam's inability to bring equality for women. The real reason for this kind of dogged persistence is that such beliefs are so deeply rooted in the believers psyche. How could a Hindu Brahmin imagine marrying off his only daughter to a Sudra? All the hell would break loose before that happens.
I have recently visited the fabled Hindu island of Bali, and what I found there is that they practise caste system with the same vigor too, irrespective of modern laws. So Hinduism and caste system are inseperable in its natural form. Massive doses of modernization is required to change this attitude, way more than Hindus are willing to accomodate now.
------------
Whatever the reasons for Hindus to venerate cows, that should not be a reason for denying minorities their right to eat beef, by using the Hindu laws of Manusmrithi, in a secular and modern India. That would be like making dhimmis out of minorities as Muslims do in their countries using sharia.
Now Brahmins are rallying behind a Dalit Mayawati in UP to make a joke with the provisions of Manu Smiriti, and you are trying to impose Manu Smiriti on Hindus.I think, if the followers of other religions ( esp Jews & Muslims) will take a clue from Hindu's initiative on these matters, then they can also get rid from the outdated, irrelevant & discriminatory provisions of their religious texts.The Sanskrit term smriti refers to those practices that are appropriate to time and place, those things that are time-bound.
My Dear BOFT,Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:And maybe, Taliban will treat them so nice that they will convert to Islam (if the above lady in Hijab haven't already) like what a UK journalist did.expozIslam wrote:She can give company to this lady
Taliban would love to have her.
She is hardly popular in the left domain of Indian politics.I also admire her persona but not the extremely anti-Hindu & ultra leftist philosophy adopted by her.
Treating someone good means they should convert to their religion?Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:And maybe, Taliban will treat them so nice that they will convert to Islam (if the above lady in Hijab haven't already) like what a UK journalist did.expozIslam wrote:She can give company to this lady
Taliban would love to have her.
BOFT? That's not the correct abbreviation. Next time concentrate, before you see yourself fit to write posts.viduur wrote:My Dear BOFT,Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:And maybe, Taliban will treat them so nice that they will convert to Islam (if the above lady in Hijab haven't already) like what a UK journalist did.expozIslam wrote:She can give company to this lady
Taliban would love to have her.
What is the reason for this nonsensical comment on your part?
Instead of pressing others into the Slavery of islam, why don't you revert back to the religion of your ancestors.
Not necessarily. I wast just relating one event to another.byteresistor wrote:Treating someone good means they should convert to their religion?Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:And maybe, Taliban will treat them so nice that they will convert to Islam (if the above lady in Hijab haven't already) like what a UK journalist did.expozIslam wrote:She can give company to this lady
Taliban would love to have her.
What is so nonsensical about it? Why do you insist on being a Muslim and claiming to have two wives? Even the 'religion of your ancestors' have made such practice illegal. Why do you insist on being a follower of an immoral violent medieval Arab? What kicks do you get out it?Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:What is the reason for this nonsensical comment on your part?viduur wrote:Instead of pressing others into the Slavery of islam, why don't you revert back to the religion of your ancestors.
Well, diotima64 is most vocal critic of polygamy on this forum.She even went to the extent of saying that justifying Hindu god Krishna having multiple wives is very much similiar to Mohammed having multiple wives as a necessity of war and politics.Well what she seemed to have forgotten is the church legalising harems for the Spaniards in South America as well as legalising the second and third native wives of white Spaniards(whose first wives were white Spanish women).Yohan wrote:What is so nonsensical about it? Why do you insist on being a Muslim and claiming to have two wives? Even the 'religion of your ancestors' have made such practice illegal. Why do you insist on being a follower of an immoral violent medieval Arab? What kicks do you get out it?Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:What is the reason for this nonsensical comment on your part?viduur wrote:Instead of pressing others into the Slavery of islam, why don't you revert back to the religion of your ancestors.
Do not skip my questions as you usually do, and answer, and prove that you do have the ball of Titanium.
- Yohan (aka 'Balls of diamond')
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewt ... c&start=15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;I wrote:Also in the 21st century has come the free market theory which permits goods and profits to travel on a massive scale but not people.
You seems to be very touchy on such minor issues, while ignoring much more larger issues, which are threatening the very survival of your Nation as well as the Religion.Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:BOFT? That's not the correct abbreviation. Next time concentrate, before you see yourself fit to write posts.viduur wrote:My Dear BOFT,
Can you kindly elaborate what is Non-sensical in my comment, so that we can have debates in more sensible manner.Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:What is the reason for this nonsensical comment on your part?viduur wrote:Instead of pressing others into the Slavery of islam, why don't you revert back to the religion of your ancestors.
Polygamy, Slavery etc were the Social codes of Past. But Social codes change with the times, and they have changed in all the socities with the exception of Islamic ones.Even the tribals are opting for monogamy at their own, although many Govts allowed their customs to prevail for some more time.Nosuperstition wrote:Well, diotima64 is most ardent attacker of polygamy on this forum.She even went to the extent of saying that justifying Hindu god Krishna having multiple wives is very much similiar to Mohammed having multiple wives as a necessity of war and politics.Well what she seemed to have forgotten is the church legalising harems for the Spaniards in South America as well as legalising the second and third native wives of white Spaniards(whose first wives were white Spanish women).