Not everything related to Trump has to do with Muslims. He alienated too many groups and people, therefore there are many people - including among conservatives and republicans who wish him ill.pr126 wrote:I am not surprised of Donald's mistrust in the present administration in DC.
Some are Muslim Brotherhood operatives, others are compromised, or on the take from Arab money.
Or just plain anti American socialist / communist ideologues.
His first task is to "drain the swamp".
What? Judges have political opinions? Opinions that might cloud their judgments? Heaven forfend! Thank goodness it couldn't happen here. None of our judges given a leg up the slippery ladder of advancement during 13 years of Labour government could possibly be like that, thank the Sainted Tony. Those Americans! Really!Donald Trump’s Supreme Court picks will leave his mark on America’s biggest ideological struggles
The future of the US Supreme Court was set to take centre stage at the first meeting between President-elect Donald Trump and the Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in Washington on Thursday, in particular whom he might appoint to fill its one vacant seat.
Jubilant in the wake of his victory on Tuesday, Republicans are now counting on Mr Trump to use the power of the presidency to tilt the court back to the ideological right, beginning with nominating a conservative to fill the seat left empty by Antonin Scalia, who died in February.
For Democrats, by contrast, the defeat of Hillary Clinton means they have lost what would have been a rare opportunity to forge a liberal-leaning majority on the country’s highest court for the first time since the early 1970s and repel conservative attempts to undermine their progressive priorities, notably on issues like abortion, immigration and minority rights.
The ideological balance in the Supreme Court was one principle issue that drove voters to pick either Mr Trump or Ms Clinton on election day with exit polls indicating that for one in five of them it was in fact their most important consideration.
Fernando wrote:What? Judges have political opinions? Opinions that might cloud their judgments? Heaven forfend! Thank goodness it couldn't happen here. None of our judges given a leg up the slippery ladder of advancement during 13 years of Labour government could possibly be like that, thank the Sainted Tony. Those Americans! Really!
Wilders, who is exercising his right not to be present at his own trial, tweeted yesterday: ‘What terrible bias from this judge who can barely disguise her hatred of the PVV.’
Wildres is a god man, whom neo-liberal elements in Holland - those beautiful souls who wish to sacrifice him, just to demonstrate to the world how fair minded they are to Muslims in Holland. If murder of Van Gogh did not teach them a lesson - nothing else will.Ariel wrote:Wilders, who is exercising his right not to be present at his own trial, tweeted yesterday: ‘What terrible bias from this judge who can barely disguise her hatred of the PVV.’
Hombre wrote:Yes indeed, say "President" who run on division, trumpeting his race card. A man who lowered any remaining standard of decorum, and civility. A president who has been found a compulsive lair with Magellanic ego, with emotional intelligence & maturity of 13 year old.ronyvo wrote:Congratulations America.
We still must pray for president Trump. The clean up process of 8 long years of corruption, treason, hate and division need very hard work, which is not strange for our president Trump.
Now, I can say president with pride.
WOW. This is fantastic news. Honestly I did not expect.
THANK YOU LORD.
What I find astounding is that, Obamacare was enacted to help low income to those low skill peoples like millions of those white people who voted for him. Allow them access to basic healthcare, with no per-condition to get insurance.
No longer live in fear they will lose everything - their entire life saving, even their homes, and go BK with a single catastrophic illness. Yet, these useful idiots followed Trump like sheep and voted for him - even against their own interest.
(btw. Increases in premium is affecting only 5% of those who have private insurance. Anyone else who gets their insurance through their employers, Medicare and VA see no effect at all.)
You can bet your cowboy boots that he won't fulfill even 5% of what he promised to those white gullible who voted for him.
"I am the only one who can fix it". My foot he can.
Ram wrote:manfred wrote:Well, it would be embarrassing if she actually had gone through with it. She did ban Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller though, some years back, remember? And neither of them ever suggested anything like a ban of Muslims, as far as I know....
There is something I am confused about....if you look at the votes cast Clinton appears to have scored some 200000 or so MORE than Trump....
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
So obviously there is a rather odd way the result is processed, perhaps similar to our "first past the post".... Would people not start complaining that Clinton has lost even though she go more votes?
Electoral College which votes for the US president. Hillary had more popular votes but Donald Trump won higher number of Electoral College delegates. Rules vary from state to state and some states, from county to county. No two states have the same rules. How the delegate are divided depends on the state and/or county rules - very complicated and not easy to understand system. That's the extent of my knowledge.
Muslim Brotherhood: Trump victory a ‘disaster’
Donald Trump’s victory in the US elections is a “disaster” for the Arab and Muslim world, a Muslim Brotherhood spokesperson said today.
Mamdouh Al-Muneer, a member of the supreme body of the Freedom and Justice Party, wrote on social media that the results of the elections were a catastrophe as a “racist” has ascended to the White House.
“Goliath is coming himself, with his horses and men… what our nation has witnessed in the last period is something and what is to come is something different. God willing it will be for us not against us.”
Amen, I am with you on that.Ariel wrote:Good....Anything that’s a disaster for the Muslim Brotherhood is good news for the rest of the world.
Muslim Brotherhood: Trump victory a ‘disaster’
Donald Trump’s victory in the US elections is a “disaster” for the Arab and Muslim world, a Muslim Brotherhood spokesperson said today.
Mamdouh Al-Muneer, a member of the supreme body of the Freedom and Justice Party, wrote on social media that the results of the elections were a catastrophe as a “racist” has ascended to the White House.
“Goliath is coming himself, with his horses and men… what our nation has witnessed in the last period is something and what is to come is something different. God willing it will be for us not against us.”
Well, most of the other stuff is off our topic, really - and clearly forum members are divided anyway. However, it's not just Muslim "refugees" - probably far more important is that there won't be Islamists throughout the administration and whispering in the president's ear. And maybe the police, FBI and CIA will get their training manuals back uncensored.idesigner1 wrote:Yes Trump won't welcome Muslim refugees! Muslim immigrants will be scrutinized. This wii be the only positive developments for us FFI supporters. On other hand this was the policy of Republicans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests