marduk wrote:Here's how Islam got its name, "submission", from the Hindu myth of Lord Vamana, a form of Vishnu. Mecca was one of three places where the footprints of Vishnu were located and revered by pilgrims. The Muslims actually still have one of the footprints to prove it. Nice of them to keep that around. My guess is that the 3 footprint locations represent the 3 paces taken by Vishnu as Vamana.
The Kaba temple which was misappropriated and captured by Muslims was originally an International Vedic Shrine. The ancient Vedic scripture Harihareswar Mahatmya mentions that Lord Vishnu's footprints are consecrated in Mecca. An important clue to this fact is that Muslims call this holy precint Haram which is a deviation of the Sanskrit term Hariyam, i.e. the precint of Lord Hari alias Lord Vishnu. The relevant stanza reads:
The allusion is to the Vamana incarnation of Lord Vishnu whose blessed feet were consecrated at three holy sites, namely Gaya, Mecca and Shukla Teertha. Worshipping such carved, holy foot impressions is a holy Vedic custom which convert Muslims are inadvertently perpetuating. But in doing this they delude themselves and mislead others that these foot-impressions which are on reverential display in several mosques and tombs around the world are in fact Muhammad's own. http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive ... 00003.html
Here's the "submission" part.
According to the myth, there was once a haughty king and vishnu assumed the form od dwarf or Vamana to teach him a lesson. He requested the proud (hence foolish) king for just so much land as he could cover with three strides. The king granted the request and vishnu took one step and covered the earth, with the second step he strode across the heavens and had nowhere to place his third step. The despotic king realized his mistake, begged forgiveness and requested vishnu - Vamana to place his third step on his head as a mark of his submission to god. Vamana Temple is dedicated to the dwarf incarnation of Vishnu. http://www.khajuraho-india.org/vamana-t ... uraho.html
At the Kaaba "Allah" was the chief god of 360. This is just like Vamana being honored by all the other gods thus showing him to be the supreme god of them all. Allah is simply Vamana disguised as YHWH.
all other gods are meant to offer homage to Him. They did this when, appearing as a young child, he was awarded the sacred thread by Brihaspati, the guru of the gods. The sun god gave Him the Gayatri mantra and His father, Kasyapa Muni, a straw belt. Mother Earth gave Him a deerskin and Lord Brahma gave Him a waterpot. Kuvera, the heavenly treasurer gave Him a monk’s begging bowl, and the wife of Lord Shiva gave Him the first alms. In this way, the gods all offered the best of what they had to the Supreme God. http://deshika.wordpress.com/2009/08/31 ... 0-lessons/
Very good marduk. Now read about Hindu having divine sources, Muhammad in the hindu scriptures. And you will se why there are so many similarities. The 10000+ year old religion of Hindu is another religion from God, it just was corrupted over the years to being a polytheist religion just like Christianity and the trinty.
Just look at the Jewish similarties with the Hindu religion.
Lunar calander, remove shoes at the temple. ritual bath before special rites.
i think at a guess,its 80% body language to 20% words for the human communication.
do ants do it this way aswell?
Why dont you ask your priest this sunday Paxi? He can teach you about how rabbits are cud chewers. And how ants have no rulers aswell. And the flat earth that has edges.
Two issues are at hand: the definition of "cud" and that of "chewing." Let's take a closer look at the Hebrew version of both. Here is the word for "cud" according to Strong's:
gerah, the cud (as scraping the throat): cud. There are a few factors we need to keep in mind here. First, this word is used nowhere in the Old Testament besides these verses in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. We have only this context to help us decide what it means in terms of the Mosaic law.
Second, refection is a process whereby these animals pass pellets of partially digested food, which they chew on (along with the waste material) in order to give their stomachs another go at getting the nutrients out. It is not just "dung" that the hares are eating, which is probably why the Hebrew word for "dung" was not used here.
Contrast this with what cows and some other animals do, rumination, which is what we moderns call "chewing the cud." They regurgitate partially digested food in little clumps called cuds, and chew it a little more while mixing it with saliva.
So then: partially digested food is a common element here. We therefore suggest that the Hebrew word simply refers to any partially digested food -- the process is not the issue, just the object.
Islam is now corrupted from letting Hindus and other non-Arabs in.
"Allah" is the same word used by Christian and Jewish Arabs in the Bible, before Islam came.
On page one of Genesis in the Old Testament, we find the word "Allah" seventeen times.
How about that
Ever seen the passion of christ Marduk?.
He says ALLAH.
The Aramaic "Elaw" and the Arabic "Allah" are the same. The Aramaic "Elaw" is derived from the Arabic "Allah", and it means "GOD". "Allah" in Arabic also means "GOD", the Supreme GOD Almighty. You can easily see the close similarity in their pronunciation.
Our other key word here is 'alah, and it is found in some grammatical form on literally every page of the OT. This is because it is a word that encompasses many concepts other than "bring up." It also can mean ascend up, carry up, cast up, fetch up, get up, recover, restore, take up and much more. It is a catch-all verb form describing the moving of something to another place.
Two issues are at hand: the definition of "cud" and that of "chewing." Let's take a closer look at the Hebrew version of both. Here is the word for "cud" according to Strong's:
gerah, the cud (as scraping the throat): cud. There are a few factors we need to keep in mind here. First, this word is used nowhere in the Old Testament besides these verses in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. We have only this context to help us decide what it means in terms of the Mosaic law.
Second, refection is a process whereby these animals pass pellets of partially digested food, which they chew on (along with the waste material) in order to give their stomachs another go at getting the nutrients out. It is not just "dung" that the hares are eating, which is probably why the Hebrew word for "dung" was not used here.
Contrast this with what cows and some other animals do, rumination, which is what we moderns call "chewing the cud." They regurgitate partially digested food in little clumps called cuds, and chew it a little more while mixing it with saliva.
So then: partially digested food is a common element here. We therefore suggest that the Hebrew word simply refers to any partially digested food -- the process is not the issue, just the object.
Unlucky for you i am a arabic speaker.
In Hebrew "arnebeth" means rabbit same in arabic arnab. Going further The Hebrew words are: 'ALEH GERAH, lit, its translated to 'chew the cud' That a white wash translation by wishfull Jews who wanted to whitewash the bible. Here a more accurate translation "raising up what has been swallowed")? Or may be translated to 'bring up the cud'. The Rabbit doesnt do this Rabbits do not bring up anything, they let it go all the way through, and then eat it again.
Priest didnt do a good job lying to you Paxi
Animals that 'chew the cud' are called ruminants. Rabbits is not a rumiant.
Ghaith wrote:Untrue, islam was attacked on this bases that it is an Errors because ants communicating was unknown before 2009. Once your grow older you will learn more about animal communication in school. Unless you attended school but sleept during classes?
The miracle is that ant communication by talking. Few animals communicate by talking. Some do it by Facial expression (Dogs for example) other by gazing (tortoises for example)
I'm having difficulty following this, Ghaith. Are you saying that it is a miracle that the Koran could know about ants talking? Because your reference says nothing whatever about ants talking - nor is any other reference likely to. So not a miracle just a mistake, taken as being factual, from a Jewish legend=fairy story.
Islam is now corrupted from letting Hindus and other non-Arabs in.
"Allah" is the same word used by Christian and Jewish Arabs in the Bible, before Islam came.
On page one of Genesis in the Old Testament, we find the word "Allah" seventeen times.
How about that
Ever seen the passion of christ Marduk?.
He says ALLAH.
The Aramaic "Elaw" and the Arabic "Allah" are the same. The Aramaic "Elaw" is derived from the Arabic "Allah", and it means "GOD". "Allah" in Arabic also means "GOD", the Supreme GOD Almighty. You can easily see the close similarity in their pronunciation.
Our other key word here is 'alah, and it is found in some grammatical form on literally every page of the OT. This is because it is a word that encompasses many concepts other than "bring up." It also can mean ascend up, carry up, cast up, fetch up, get up, recover, restore, take up and much more. It is a catch-all verb form describing the moving of something to another place.
other key world alah ? Elaw is directly Allah not just a part of it. Ever seen an arabic bible? Lets have a look at genesis.
Ghaith wrote:Untrue, islam was attacked on this bases that it is an Errors because ants communicating was unknown before 2009. Once your grow older you will learn more about animal communication in school. Unless you attended school but sleept during classes?
The miracle is that ant communication by talking. Few animals communicate by talking. Some do it by Facial expression (Dogs for example) other by gazing (tortoises for example)
I'm having difficulty following this, Ghaith. Are you saying that it is a miracle that the Koran could know about ants talking? Because your reference says nothing whatever about ants talking - nor is any other reference likely to. So not a miracle just a mistake, taken as being factual, from a Jewish legend=fairy story.
The closest two words we find are the Hebrew "alah".
(which means to curse, mourn or rise)
Ĕlāhā in Aramaic, Jesus spoke Aramaic have a good time Paxi I be latter on today helping you get ride of polytheist fate your parants tricked you into.
Ghaith wrote:I gotta do some reading for a test now Paxi. I educate you more later.
Dont bother reading, I can assure you no scientist is going to agree that mountains have intelligence or emotions. Nor will they claim the earth and heaven can speak...... I know its hard for you to agree on that because Allah says otherwise.
Trust me this isn't a new miracle in the Koran.
Dont waste your time on such nonsense!
Islam preys on the ignorant and the cowardly, which one are you muslim?
Two issues are at hand: the definition of "cud" and that of "chewing." Let's take a closer look at the Hebrew version of both. Here is the word for "cud" according to Strong's:
gerah, the cud (as scraping the throat): cud. There are a few factors we need to keep in mind here. First, this word is used nowhere in the Old Testament besides these verses in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. We have only this context to help us decide what it means in terms of the Mosaic law.
Second, refection is a process whereby these animals pass pellets of partially digested food, which they chew on (along with the waste material) in order to give their stomachs another go at getting the nutrients out. It is not just "dung" that the hares are eating, which is probably why the Hebrew word for "dung" was not used here.
Contrast this with what cows and some other animals do, rumination, which is what we moderns call "chewing the cud." They regurgitate partially digested food in little clumps called cuds, and chew it a little more while mixing it with saliva.
So then: partially digested food is a common element here. We therefore suggest that the Hebrew word simply refers to any partially digested food -- the process is not the issue, just the object.
Unlucky for you i am a arabic speaker.
In Hebrew "arnebeth" means rabbit same in arabic arnab. Going further The Hebrew words are: 'ALEH GERAH, lit, its translated to 'chew the cud' That a white wash translation by wishfull Jews who wanted to whitewash the bible. Here a more accurate translation "raising up what has been swallowed")? Or may be translated to 'bring up the cud'. The Rabbit doesnt do this Rabbits do not bring up anything, they let it go all the way through, and then eat it again.
Priest didnt do a good job lying to you Paxi
Animals that 'chew the cud' are called ruminants. Rabbits is not a rumiant.
you are fullof sh1te..
Unlucky for you i am a arabic speaker.
In Hebrew "arnebeth" means rabbit same in arabic arnab. Going further
Lev. 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.
Cheak everything i said. Paxi, i know you still have some love for worshiping Idol Jesus and is having a hard time accepting that Christianty is not the right way
It defines both, but primary it stands for Rabbit.
You se there is no Hewbrew word for Hare. ארנב is also used for Hare. Have a go yourself http://translate.google.com/ try them both in the English/hebrew But the internal system of Hare and Rabbit is the same, none of them are rumiants.
Fernando wrote:I'm having difficulty following this, Ghaith. Are you saying that it is a miracle that the Koran could know about ants talking? Because your reference says nothing whatever about ants talking - nor is any other reference likely to. So not a miracle just a mistake, taken as being factual, from a Jewish legend=fairy story.
Watch the video in my signature.
Sorry Ghaith, I can't. Your sig seems to have vanished along with most other people's. Can you post the link, please?
So Ghaith admits that Islam and Judaism both are corrupted forms of Hinduism. That's progress. Now bow in submission to Lord Vamana, brother Ghaith. Here's an idol of him right here. Just bow to this image on your screen and all will be well.
Now look how you will even have the same 4 holy months. Your conversion to idol worship will be easy. You can even still starve yourself for a month if you so desire. Vamanaism has no restrictions on self punishment.
Chaturmas (Sanskrit: चातुर्मास, Cāturmāsa) is a holy period of four months (July to October), beginning on Shayani Ekadashi—the eleventh day of the first bright half, Shukla paksha, of Ashadh (fourth month of the Hindu lunar calendar)—until Prabodhini Ekadashi, the eleventh day of the first bright half of Kartik (eighth month of the Hindu lunar calendar) in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism.
Chaturmas is reserved the year for penance, austerities, fasting, bathing in holy rivers and religious observances for all. Devotees resolve to observe some form of vow, be it of silence or abstaining from a favourite food item, or having only a single meal in a day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturmas
Last edited by marduk on Thu May 10, 2012 5:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Who is online
In total there are 0 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 0 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes) Most users ever online was 135 on Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:37 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
? Elaw is directly Allah not just a part of it. 
