Iranzamin88 wrote:In my opinion: Arabs, Kurds, and Pakistanis
Least radical or better said most secular: Iranians, Turks, Tajiks
Really quite preposterous.
In my own lifetime the Iranians had a popular revolution to install a theocracy under Khomeini. In Iran they do enforce the death penalty for apostasy.
The Iranians are pussies. They surrendered to the Arabs 1400 years ago, and still today remain so abjectly conquered that the Arabs don't need to come to Iran to do islam's dirty work for them. The Iranians do that on their own, which means they have no self respect or backbone at all. After 1400 years, they still pray to whoreamster allah in the language of their Arabic conquerors. Good grief, Khomeini didn't even speak Farsi properly. He spoke better Arabic.
The Iranians have been a conquered people for so long that they have forgotten that they are conquered. Almost all of them collaborate with their Arab masters, which is why I admire much more the people of the Indian subcontinent. In spite of enduring the largest genocide in history at the hands of muslims, India still today is predominately non muslim. To be sure however, the inhabitants of Pukeistan fit within the same description I have applied to Iranians.
Imagine...a popular revolution to install a leader who openly advocated sex with goats and children. So is it a stretch to refer to Iranians as a country of pedophiles and fornicators of goats? I think not.
The prophet of Islam was nothing more than a common criminal.
Please tell me if this is accurate:
“I have fabricated things against God and have imputed to Him words which He has not spoken.”
~MUHAMMAD (Al-Tabari 6:111)