All of the irrelevant garbage that you brought will be ignored . Now the point you are making here is the translation of 48:24 isnt correct.I bought 7-8 translations previously . You stupid troll there are around 35 translations of the same verse at link that I have given below . All of them translate that verse to include Mecca in the verse. Enough your stupidity you troll! Rather than getting angry with you I am feeling sympathy for you... All these people were certainly skilled in arabic and you a non muslim who doesnt even know arabic is teaching arabic here based on your copy pastes from free minders.The Cat wrote:Spoiler! :
http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/48/. ... efault.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Even he accepts that the verse contains mecca and even I consulted Ahmed Bahgat( a native arabic speaker) who to agreed that the correct translation of the verse should include MECCA . This will be my last reply to you regarding translation of 48:24. There is no proof further needed .I deliberately answered this argument first because your entire historical proofs and other things collapse if quran mentions mecca as you believe its the product of 6th century or 7th century so this establishes existence of MECCA. Now you have lost here because claiming mecca didnt exist till 8th century means that we had no quran till 8th century and quran is a product of Abbasid dynasty. SO bid goodbye to your holy and dear quran only stand PISSY CAT!!!Debunker a native arabic speaker wrote: I don't understand what the dispute is but the verse literally translates
"And it is He who withheld their hands from you and withheld your hands from
them, in the belly of Mecca, after He had made you overcome them".
In context, the verse simply talks about the event of the Muslims capturing
Mecca without a fight.
I am sure CAT must have read somewhere about appeal to authority fallacy and now he is bound to bring it here so before he brings it in I will quote what Debunker had to say to me regarding translations made by FREE MINDERS..
Debunker wrote: P. S. The CAT is an idiot whom I never engaged in a conversation with, because
he believes whatever he wants, anyway, regardless of any evidence. Btw, I
guess some of his more recent arguments are influenced by Quranists. Those
people are the most dishonest Muslims you'd ever meet anywhere. They twist
the meaning of verses by heavily relying on the *roots* of words, twisting
every verse they don't like, forcing it to say what they want it to say.