Quran Only: Why it is not possible?

Shari'a, errancies, miracles and science
User avatar
KhaliL
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 am

Quran Only: Why it is not possible?

Post by KhaliL »

__________________________________________________________


[This is the first part o f a series of writings on “Why Adopting a Quran only approach is impractical for Muslims”. Funk Soul Bruhva already has an excellent article on this but my aim is to go through another route to tackle the issue]:

Like other Semitic religions, Islam stresses on the importance of Salvation. It is not just about enlightenment, but salvation is a must for Muslims. Now, Let us see how salvation can be achieved.

Without the love and mercy of Allah, no Muslim can achieve salvation, because as human beings they all are prone to error, sins and only god can forgive those sins and admit them to his paradise. And if Allah has to forgive, Muslim should acquire Allah’s love. Allah not loving a Muslim means no salvation at all; .

Now, let us have a look at the following verse from Quran on how it is possible for a Muslim to attain Allah’s love:


Say [O Prophet]: "If you love God, follow me [and] God will love you and forgive you your sins; for God is much-forgiving, a dispenser of grace."[Quran Chapter: 3:31]

The style of this verse is like Muhammad speaking on behalf of Allah, or god prompts Muhammad to speak up. To acquire god’s love, we understand it is essential to follow the man to whom this book was revealed. Great; but who is that man? I don’t think any Muslims will have problem here to admit it is Muhammad the prophet of Islam. So far good but how far it would do?

Allah says: following Muhammad is very much essential to gain Allah’s love and forgiveness likewise. Or if faithful follow Muhammad’s footsteps, they can reach to god’s immense love. Other interpretation can be if anyone wants to love god and acquire god’s love in return, the only way is through Muhammad. Follow Muhammad, then Allah will love you too. This is a general message for all Muslims from their god.

Now the quandary begins. The predicament of Quran only genus; how are they going to follow Muhammad?

It is practically impossible to follow a dead man if he is not known well. Or to be precise; to follow a man, you must know the man perfectly well. Like when did he born, how many years he lived and when did he die? Who were his parents? How was his familial life? Whether the person have left any children?

None of these are available in Quran. The holy text does not say the birth date or childhood of Muhammad, It does not mention when did Muhammad breath his last. The only notion it gives us is he had more than one wives but he was not the father of any believing males. That means he was childless? May be but since the word used is "Rijal" it should be denoting males so he can have believing daughters. That is not contrary to Quan’s assertion:

Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.[Quran: 33:40]

Yet some weird Muslims claim it is possible to attain salvation through Quran only.., Well Muslims, you are not going to get your god’s love and forgiveness if you go with only Quran in your hands. You should know your prophet well in order to follow his footsteps. To follow a dead man, you should know how he lived his life. Only by knowing all in details you will get a picture of your role model. And only then you will be able emulate your prophet as Quran dictated essential for your salvation.

Otherwise, sadly…, I mean very sadly you will miss your god’s love and mercy. Well, if you miss your god’s love and mercy then you missed everything;

Edit: This post has been refuted by Ahmed Bahgat. See my post below:

viewtopic.php?p=14831#p14831" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by KhaliL on Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:09 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
skynightblaze
Posts: 3920
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by skynightblaze »

I believe in proving muslims wrong in a practical way than the textual way .

. Out of all the devout muslims i ask one muslim to come forward and write a single statement defaming their prophet. All i need is 1 out of so many devout muslims and that too writing a single statement. Our ARSE LOVER DISMISSED ME on the challenge that I issued to him . HE still doesnt know what to say about this challenge.If none of the devout muslims of today can even think of defaming prophet then what makes them think in their fantasy world of bukhari lying entirely?

Muslims might even come with a counter question as to what is the guarantee that Bukhari was indeed a devout muslim.Even this can be practically debunked . SO we should ask the muslim to come up with another exercise in that case.

How many muslims are ready to promote ALi sina the liars book " Understanding Muhhamad" for understanding details about their glorious prophet muhhamad for the next 1400 centuries to come?

Do you all see the stupidity of the muslim argument? Would any muslim promote Ali sina 's book as a source for understanding muhhamad ? IF not how could they accuse the other devout muslims during Bukhari's time to promote his book of hadiths when he was lying and talking nonsense about their beloved prophet?


In the light of the above it can be proven that hadiths werent forged as our ARSE LOVER BELIEVES.
Look around yourself and you'll find people with virtues are never required to demand respect since they automatically earn it. It is only those that are devoid of any virtues need to threaten and bully to gain respect. Needless to say that quran cannot be from God.

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

I have edited my comment into 2 comments below due to the extra info I added:
Last edited by AhmedBahgat on Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

myArseAblaze wrote:I believe in proving muslims wrong in a practical way than the textual way .

. Out of all the devout muslims i ask one muslim to come forward and write a single statement defaming their prophet. All i need is 1 out of so many devout muslims and that too writing a single statement. Our ARSE LOVER DISMISSED ME on the challenge that I issued to him . HE still doesnt know what to say about this challenge.If none of the devout muslims of today can even think of defaming prophet then what makes them think in their fantasy world of bukhari lying entirely?

Muslims might even come with a counter question as to what is the guarantee that Bukhari was indeed a devout muslim.Even this can be practically debunked . SO we should ask the muslim to come up with another exercise in that case.

How many muslims are ready to promote ALi sina the liars book " Understanding Muhhamad" for understanding details about their glorious prophet muhhamad for the next 1400 centuries to come?

Do you all see the stupidity of the muslim argument? Would any muslim promote Ali sina 's book as a source for understanding muhhamad ? IF not how could they accuse the other devout muslims during Bukhari's time to promote his book of hadiths when he was lying and talking nonsense about their beloved prophet?


In the light of the above it can be proven that hadiths werent forged as our ARSE LOVER BELIEVES.
Listen, myArseAblaze

what sort of challenge is that you stupid freak?

Of course no Muslims will even acceot such challenge, not only for Mohammed, but for any other prophet as well, why we shoould defame any of the noble prophets you kafir bound to hell?, do you think that the true Muslims or even the confused Muslims are as confused as the Christians?

You are dismissed again, punk

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

Salam all

One of the filthy, retarded, confused and shameless kafir on FFI (Khalil Fariel) is still promoting his ignorance desiring that the Muslims should uphold the crap called hadith, this is what the filthy has to say:

The retarded kafir Khlail Fariel said on FFI:

[This is the first part o f a series of writings on “Why Adopting a Quran only approach is impractical for Muslims”. Funk Soul Bruhva already has an excellent article on this but my aim is to go through another route to tackle the issue]

Like other Semitic religions, Islam stresses on the importance of Salvation. It is not just about enlightenment, but salvation is a must for Muslims. Now, Let us see how salvation can be achieved.

Without the love and mercy of Allah, no Muslim can achieve salvation, because as human beings they all are prone to error, sins and only god can forgive those sins and admit them to his paradise. And if Allah has to forgive, Muslim should acquire Allah’s love. Allah not loving a Muslim means no salvation at all; .

Now, let us have a look at the following verse from Quran on how it is possible for a Muslim to attain Allah’s love:

Say [O Prophet]: "If you love God, follow me [and] God will love you and forgive you your sins; for God is much-forgiving, a dispenser of grace."[Quran Chapter: 3:31]

The style of this verse is like Muhammad speaking on behalf of Allah, or god prompts Muhammad to speak up. To acquire god’s love, we understand it is essential to follow the man to whom this book was revealed. Great; but who is that man? I don’t think no Muslims (or Kaffirs?) will have problem here to admit it is Muhammad the prophet of Islam. So far good but how far it would do?

Allah says: following Muhammad is very much essential to gain Allah’s love and forgiveness likewise. Or if faithful follow Muhammad’s footsteps, they can reach to god’s immense love. Other interpretation can be if anyone wants to love god and acquire god’s love in return, the only way is through Muhammad. Follow Muhammad, then Allah will love you too. This is a general message for all Muslims from their god.

Now the quandary begins. The predicament of Quran only genus; how are they going to follow Muhammad?

It is practically impossible to follow a dead man if he is not known well. Or to be precise; to follow a man, you must know the man perfectly well. Like when did he born, how many years he lived and when did he die? Who were his parents? How was his familial life? Whether the person have left any children?

None of these are available in Quran. The holy text does not say the birth date or childhood of Muhammad, It does not mention when did Muhammad breath his last. The only notion it gives us is he had more than one wives but he was not the father of any believers. That means either he was childless, or if he had any kids, they were not believers since Muhammad being the father of believers will be contrary to Quan’s assertion:

Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.[Quran: 33:40

Yet some weird Muslims claim it is possible to reach god through Quran only.., Well Muslims, you are not going to get your god’s love and forgiveness if you go with only Quran in your hands. You should know your prophet well to follow his footsteps. To follow a dead man, you should know the life history of this man. Only by knowing all in details you will get a picture of your role model. And only then you will be able to know how he lived his life, moreover only through this way you can follow, emulate your prophet.

Otherwise, sadly…, I mean very sadly you will miss your god’s love. Well, if you miss your god’s love then you missed everything;
---------------------------------------------

Ahmed says:

You can see how retarded and confused such prick is, he is basing his flawed argument on one word in verse 3:31 فاتبعوني , Fa Itabiooni, i.e. Then follow me, for such retarded kafir the word means to follow the crap and man made books of hadith, the books that Allah never sent to us, rather invented by a bunch that I classify as the Criminals of Islam, like Bukhari, Muslim and their likes

For a punk like Khalil and as punks like the confused Muslims and hadith worshippers, someone like me is not following the prophet, despite I follow the Quran, I pray 5 times a day, I fast, I pay Zakah (Alms) and will do Hajj (if I could), for such freaks bound to hell, yet I can not be a Muslim, for them I have to be following such man made crap books of hadith which Allah never sent, so I become a follower of the prophet, hahahahahah, what a bunch of clear cut Mushrikoon

The word we have in hand Follow is used numerous times in the Quran, let me show you many verses and you judge for yourself if the prophet meant in 3:31 by following him, is to follow the man made crap books of hadith that did not even exist during the prophet time:

Indeed, the nearest of the people to Ibrahim are those who followed him and (followed) this prophet and those who believed, and Allah is the guardian of the believers.

[The Quran ; 3:68]

ان اولى الناس بابراهيم للذين اتبعوه وهذا النبي والذين امنوا والله ولي المؤمنين

-> See what Allah is telling us in 3:68, Indeed, the nearest of the people to Ibrahim are those who followed him and (followed) this prophet, how clear, see, it is not just following Mohammed, rather following Mohammed AND Ibrahim at the same time, this can not be through the books of the man made crap hadith, simply, such retarded books never existed during Ibrahim time, nor even during Mohammed time, therefore it is clear that we should follow these prophets in one thing that they all came with, the same message that Allah sent with all His prophets, to believe in Allah and follow the revelation He sent through His scriptures to seek guidance.

Mohammed himself was commanded to follow the religion of Ibrahim, let’s read:

Then We revealed to you to follow the religion of Ibrahim, the upright one, and he was not among the polytheists.

[The Quran ; 16:123]

ثم اوحينا اليك ان اتبع ملة ابراهيم حنيفا وما كان من المشركين

-> How clear the command of Allah to Mohammed to follow the religion of Ibrahim: Then We revealed to you to follow the religion of Ibrahim, the upright one , see how the verse ended by telling us that Ibrahim was not of the polytheists (Mushrikoon), i.e. he was not following anything else that is not sent by Allah: and he was not among the polytheists. , i.e. those who follow the Quran (which Allah sent) and the crap books of hadith (which Allah never sent) MUST BE POLYTHEISTS (Mushrikoon)

Did Mohammed obey the command of Allah, stated above? Let’s read it in one of his 100% Sahih hadith (through the Quran):

Say: Indeed my Lord has guided me to a straight path; a valuable religion, the faith of Ibrahim the upright, and he was not of the polytheists.

[The Quran ; 6:161]

قل انني هداني ربي الي صراط مستقيم دينا قيما ملة ابراهيم حنيفا وما كان من المشركين

-> See what Mohammed was saying to the people : Say: Indeed my Lord has guided me to a straight path; a valuable religion, the faith of Ibrahim, the upright , so Mohammed was not following anything else but the religion of Ibrahim, see how again the verse is telling us that Ibrahim was not of the polytheists: and he was not of the polytheists, i.e. if Mohammed was following anything else but the religion of Ibrahim, then Mohammed would have been from among the polytheists.

Mohammed himself was commanded to tell the people to follow the religion of Ibrahim. Let’s read it in another one of his 100% Sahih hadith (through the Quran):

Say: Allah has spoken the truth, therefore follow the religion of Ibrahim, the upright; and he was not one of the polytheists.

[The Quran ; 3:95]

قل صدق الله فاتبعوا مله ابراهيم حنيفا وما كان من المشركين

-> How clear again: see what Mohammed was saying to the people: Say: Allah has spoken the truth, therefore follow the religion of Ibrahim, the upright;, see how consistent the message about Ibrahim is, that he was not among the polytheists: and he was not one of the polytheists. , therefore if I am following the religion of Ibrahim and the Quran (sent by Allah), then I am doing exactly what Allah commanded me to do, i.e. following Ibrahim and Mohammed.

Allah clearly told us that the best of us are those who follow the religion of Ibrahim, i.e. Mohammed and those who follow the religion of Ibrahim must be the best of the people:

And who has a better religion than the one who submitted his face to Allah and while he is doer of good and followed the religion of Ibrahim, the upright, and Allah took Ibrahim as a friend.

[The Quran ; 4:125]

ومن احسن دينا ممن اسلم وجهه لله وهو محسن واتبع ملة ابراهيم حنيفا واتخذ الله ابراهيم خليلا

-> How clear, see: And who has a better religion than the one who submitted his face to Allah and while he is doer of good and followed the religion of Ibrahim, the upright,, see how it is all about following Ibrahim not following Mohammed, Mohammed himself was a follower of Ibrahim, i.e. by following Mohammed, then we are automatically followers of Ibrahim, following Mohammed in here means following what was revealed to him from Allah, not bloody following the man made crap books of hadith that did not even exist during Mohammed time.

In the next verse, we read clearly that Mohammed was ordered to follow what is revealed to him:

Follow what is revealed to you from your Lord; there is no god but He; and turn away from the polytheists.

[The Quran ; 6:106]

اتبع ما اوحي اليك من ربك لا اله الا هو واعرض عن المشركين

-> See, Follow what is revealed to you from your Lord, which has to be the Quran, not the man made crap books of hadith, can you see how the verse ended by telling Mohammed to ignore the polytheists: and turn away from the polytheists. That is exactly what I am doing, I am turning away from those confused Mushrik Muslims because most of them are polytheists, and I will continue to do so until my time arrives.

Same message for Mohammed to only follow what Allah has revealed to him (the Quran):

And follow what is revealed to you and be patient until Allah judges, and He is the best of the judges.

[The Quran ; 10:109]

واتبع ما يوحي اليك واصبر حتي يحكم الله وهو خير الحاكمين

-> See: And follow what is revealed to you and be patient until Allah judges , and that is again what I am doing exactly, I am following what was revealed to Mohammed from Allah, while turning away from those punks of Mushrik Muslims and I have no other option but to be patient until Allah judges between me and such Mushrik Muslims, His judgment should be enough for me because: He is the best of the judges.

And again:

And follow what is revealed to you from your Lord; surely Allah is Aware of what you do;

[The Quran ; 33:2]

واتبع ما يوحي اليك من ربك ان الله كان بما تعملون خبيرا

-> See: And follow what is revealed to you from your Lord;, how many times those punks of kafirs and their fellow Mushrik Muslims have to read it to comprehend their Kufr and their Shirk? Unless one hell of a manipulator among them may come and tell us that these books of crap hadith were also revealed and sent down by Allah.

Mohammed must have followed what Allah revealed to him, see this verse, another 100% Sahih hadith by Mohammed:

Say: I do not say to you, I have the treasures of Allah, nor do I know the unseen, nor do I say to you that I am an angel; rather I follow that which is revealed to me. Say: Are the blind and those with vision equal? Will you not then think?

[The Quran ; 6:50]

قل لا اقول لكم عندي خزائن الله ولا اعلم الغيب ولا اقول لكم اني ملك ان اتبع الا ما يوحي الي قل هل يستوي الاعمي والبصير افلا تتفكرون

-> How clear, again and again, see what Mohammed was saying to the people: Say: I do not say to you, I have the treasures of Allah, nor do I know the unseen, nor do I say to you that I am an angel; rather I follow that which is revealed to me. Now every single Kafir and Mushrik Muslim should know that what was revealed to Mohammed can not be the man made crap books of hadith, this is because of two obvious reasons:

1- Such crap books called books of hadith did not exist during Mohammed time
2- Allah never revealed such man made crap books of hadith to Mohammed

-> No wonder the verse is ending by telling those confused freaks in yet another 100% sahih hadith by Mohammed: Say: Are the blind and those with vision equal? Will you not then think?

And again Mohammed confirmed in his true hadith (through the Quran) that he was ONLY following what Allah has revealed to him:

Say: I am not the first of the messengers, and I do not know what will be done with me or with you: I do not follow anything but that which is revealed to me, and I am nothing but a plain warner.

[The Quran ; 46:9]

قل ما كنت بدعا من الرسل وما ادري ما يفعل بي ولا بكم ان اتبع الا ما يوحي الي وما انا الا نذير مبين

-> See again the true hadith of Mohammed: Say: I am not the first of the messengers, and I do not know what will be done with me or with you: I do not follow anything but that which is revealed to me

-> See how Mohammed was sort of telling them that following him is nothing new: I am not the first of the messengers, rather the exact same that happened with all messengers before him, that they must have told their people to follow them, you should read a few examples of such other messengers later in this refute.

The problem for such Mushrik Muslims who shirk what Allah has sent with what Allah never sent, is simply this, they follow what their parents were following, i.e. they inherited their shirk, let’s see how Allah told us as such in the most clear way possible:

And when it is said to them: Follow what Allah has sent down, they said: We shall follow what we used to from our fathers, even though their fathers do not understand a thing, nor do they follow the guidance.

[The Quran ; 2:170]

واذا قيل لهم اتبعوا ما انزل الله قالوا بل نتبع ما الفينا عليه اباءنا اولو كان اباؤهم لا يعقلون شيئا ولا يهتدون

-> It can’t get clearer than this, see: And when it is said to them: Follow what Allah has sent down, they said: We shall follow what we used to from our fathers, THAT IS EXACTLY THE CASE WITH ALL THOSE MUSHRIK MUSLIMS BOUND TO HELL, every time I tell those freaks the same Quran message: Follow what Allah has sent down , they tell me boldly, how come all the previous generations in 1400 years were wrong, i.e. they must follow what their fathers used to follow: We shall follow what we used to from our fathers , and even if their fathers were confused as hell, they still follow them, that is is the exact same as the Christians and the Jews, all bound to hell, see what Allah is telling us next: even though their fathers do not understand a thing, nor do they follow the guidance. , i.e. they are nothing but a bunch of stubborn Muzhiks who are in the process of securing their pits in hell. In fact using the same Muslim flawed argument that how come all these generations in 1400 years were flawed, then the Christian argument must be admissible too, that how come all those generations of Christians were flawed over 2000 years, if the Muslims use such flawed argument, then they should dare not to tell the Christians that their religion was flawed for 2000 years.

This common flaw by the humans of following their parents even if their parents know nothing is very common in humanity, look around you and you should see most of those following a religion are only following what they inherited from their parents without thinking if their parents were wrong or not, for them, their parents must have been right:

And when it is said to them: Follow what Allah has revealed, they say: Nay, we follow that on which we found our fathers. It is like the Shaitan calls them to the torture of the hellfire!

[The Quran ; 31:21]

واذا قيل لهم اتبعوا ما انزل الله قالوا بل نتبع ما وجدنا عليه اباءنا اولو كان الشيطان يدعوهم الي عذاب السعير

-> See: And when it is said to them: Follow what Allah has revealed, they say: Nay, we follow that on which we found our fathers. It makes no difference to them if their parents were flawed, it is like they are invited by their parents to the hellfire and they are happy to follow them, see: It is like the Shaitan calls them to the torture of the hellfire!

In the next we read clearly what the believers should follow, let’s see:

And this is My path, (which is) straight, therefore follow it, and follow not the (other) ways, for they will lead you away from His way; this (is what) He has enjoined you with that you may fear (Allah).

[The Quran ; 6:153]

وان هذا صراطي مستقيما فاتبعوه ولا تتبعوا السبل فتفرق بكم عن سبيله ذلكم وصاكم به لعلكم تتقون

-> See what Allah is telling us to follow: And this is My path, (which is) straight, therefore follow it, , in fact in the same verse Allah is warning us not to follow any other path: and follow not the (other) ways , sounds like Allah is warning us against these crap books of hadith that He never sent, see what Allah is telling us next, that is if we follow such non sense books of hadith (the other ways): for they will lead you away from His way, HOW CLEAR, this is exactly what happened to the confused Muslims, they ignored what Allah has sent which we should only follow, and followed other man made crap which Allah never sent, which resulted in the division of Islam into numerous sects and ideologies. Can you see that by listening to Allah we will be Muttaqeen (fearful of Allah): this (is what) He has enjoined you with that you may fear (Allah). , however the confused Muslims do not want to do that, they do not want to fear Allah, they only fear the heads of shirk through their Mullah, Imams, Muftis and Sheikhs, for them, what those confused punks (the hadith writers and their followers) say, is more of a value than what Allah says. I seek refuge in Allah.

In fact, two verses down, Allah clearly told us what His straight path that we should follow is:

And this is a Book We have sent down, (which is) blessed; therefore follow it and fear (Allah) so that you may receive mercy.

[The Quran ; 6:155]

وهذا كتاب انزلناه مبارك فاتبعوه واتقوا لعلكم ترحمون

-> How clear, certainly the straight path of Allah must be through His Quran, see: And this is a Book We have sent down, (which is) blessed; therefore follow it and fear (Allah) so that you may receive mercy., therefore those who do not follow it, or shirk it with other books that Allah never sent down do not fear Allah nor they will receive mercy from Him.

We also read in the Sahih Hadith of Mohammed (through the Quran) that he asked those freaks to bring another book (FROM ALLAH) other than the Quran that is better so he may follow it:

Say: Then bring some (other) book from Allah which is a better guide than both of them, (that) I may follow it, if you are truthful.

[The Quran ; 28:49]

قل فاتوا بكتاب من عند الله هو اهدي منهما اتبعه ان كنتم صادقين

-> See the true hadith of Mohammed: Say: Then bring some (other) book from Allah which is a better guide than both of them, (that) I may follow it. Well we know well that all these man made crap books of hadith are not FROM ALLAH, so how come we should follow it? The verse here is clear, that we may follow other books but only if:

1- The book is from Allah
2- The book is better in guidance than the Quran

Now the man made books of hadith are not from Allah nor they are better guidance than the Quran, therefore Muslims have committed no sin by not following such crap books of man made hadith, according to 28:49

Mohammed was a warner for those who accept and follow the Quran, see this verse:

You can only warn him who follows the reminder and fears the Compassionate in secret; so announce to him forgiveness and an honourable reward.

[The Quran ; 36:11]

انما تنذر من اتبع الذكر وخشي الرحمن بالغيب فبشره بمغفرة واجر كريم

-> See: You can only warn him who follows the reminder and fears the Compassionate in secret , and we all know that الذكر , Al-Zikr, i.e. The reminder is nothing but the Quran, therefore, Mohammed was sent to those who will follow the Quran as stated clearly in this verse.

All (Kafirs, Mushriks and Muslims) know well that Allah never sent down such man made books, and we know well that what He sent down is called Quran, here is the clear order to follow such Quran:

Follow what has been sent down to you from your Lord and do not follow other than Him as guardians, little that you remember.

[The Quran ; 7:3]

اتبعوا ما انزل اليكم من ربكم ولا تتبعوا من دونه اولياء قليلا ما تذكرون

-> Very clear that Allah is telling us to follow what he sent down: Follow (plural) what has been sent down to you from your Lord and do not follow other than Him as guardians, , there will be no punk of those kafirs and their fellow Mushrik Muslims who has balls to tell us that these man made crap books of hadith are what Allah has sent down. The fact remains intact, that those punks from among the kafirs and their fellow Mushrik Muslims do not want to remember: little that you remember.

In the next verse we read another Sahih hadith of Mohammed (through the Quran) in such hadith, it is clearly said that Mohammed was a believer in Allah words, not Bukhari words, not Muslim words, and certainly not any of those confused hadith writers words:

Say: O people! Indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you all, to Whom belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth, there is no god but He; He gives life and causes death therefore believe in Allah and His messenger. The unlettered prophet who believes in Allah and His words, and follow him so that you may be guided.

[The Quran ; 7:158]

قل يأيها الناس اني رسول الله اليكم جميعا الذي له ملك السماوات والارض لا اله الا هو يحيي ويميت فامنوا بالله ورسوله النبي الامي الذي يؤمن بالله وكلماته واتبعوه لعلكم تهتدون

-> See: The unlettered prophet who believes in Allah and His words, and because Mohammed believes in Allah and His words, then we should follow his path, see: and follow him so that you may be guided.. How we will be following him in the allegations by the confused hadith writers while the fact of the matter, all these man made books did not exist during Mohammed time?

Indeed, Mohammed was ONLY using the Quran to warn the people, and when he was doing so the kafirs told him to bring another book except that Quran, let’s read:

And when Our signs are recited to them clearly, those who desire not Our meeting say: Bring a Quran other than this or change it. Say: It is not for me that I change it on my own accord; I only follow what is revealed to me; indeed I fear if I disobey my Lord, the torture of a mighty day.

[The Quran ; 10:15]

واذا تتلي عليهم اياتنا بينات قال الذين لا يرجون لقاءنا ائت بقران غير هذا او بدله قل ما يكون لي ان ابدله من تلقاء نفسي ان اتبع الا ما يوحي الي اني اخاف ان عصيت ربي عذاب يوم عظيم

-> See: And when Our signs are recited to them clearly, those who desire not Our meeting say: Bring a Quran other than this or change it. , well it seems that all those hadith writers and their fellow Mushrik Muslims were not happy with the Quran alone, and because Mohammed was dead at that and this time, so they could not ask him likewise the kafir asked him, to bring another book but the Quran, so they created their own books, many of them that contradict each other, as well contradict itself, these books can not be called the straight path, they are indeed the deviant path that most Muslims chose to follow in addition to the straight path of Allah (the Quran), see what Mohammed said to those freaks request as stated in his Sahih Hadith (through the Quran): Say: It is not for me that I change it on my own accord; I only follow what is revealed to me, i.e. by following Mohammed, we should follow what was revealed to him from Allah, this revelation is nothing but the Quran, that is why those freaks asked him to bring another Quran other than the Quran that Allah sent. You should know that the word Quran implies reading, i.e. those freaks were asking for other books so they read it and seek guidance from it, and that is exactly what happened to the confused Ummah of Muslims, they read such man made books and spread its message between the believers while totally ignoring the Quran, or just giving it the least attention, they are fixated on such man made carp books of hadith, the man made books that Allah never sent or revealed to anyone. No wonder that Mohammed himself will bear witness against them on the judgment day, let’s read:

And the messenger would say: O my Lord! Indeed, my people has abandoned this Quran.

[The Quran ; 25:30]

وقال الرسول يا رب ان قومي اتخذوا هذا القران مهجورا

-> How clear, the prophet is bearing witness against his own people that they ignored the Quran: O my Lord! Indeed, my people has abandoned this Quran.

Following Mohammed or any other prophet for that matter, is nothing but following the path of Allah, this is because Mohammed had no mean to warn or guide the people except with the Quran, therefore if we follow Mohammed in the Quran then we are automatically following the path of Allah:

Those who bear the power and those around Him celebrate the praise of their Lord and believe in Him and ask protection for those who believe: Our Lord! You encompassed all things in mercy and knowledge, therefore grant protection to those who turned (to You) and followed Your path, and save them from the torture of the hellfire.

[The Quran ; 40:7]

الذين يحملون العرش ومن حوله يسبحون بحمد ربهم ويؤمنون به ويستغفرون للذين امنوا ربنا وسعت كل شئ رحمة وعلما فاغفر للذين تابوا واتبعوا سبيلك وقهم عذاب الجحيم

-> See what the angels say in the above verse: therefore grant protection to those who turned (to You) and followed Your path. Now, following the man made crap books of hadith, can not be considered following the path of Allah, this is because Allah never sent such flawed books from the first place.

In fact in the following verse we read clearly that Allah ordered us to follow anyone who is humble to Allah:

And if they contend with you that you should associate with Me what you have no knowledge of, do not obey them, and keep company with them in this world kindly, and follow the way of him who turns to Me, then to Me is your return, then will I inform you of what you did.

[The Quran ; 31:15]

وان جاهداك علي ان تشرك بي ما ليس لك به علم فلا تطعهما وصاحبهما في الدنيا معروفا واتبع سبيل من اناب الي ثم الي مرجعكم فانبئكم بما كنتم تعملون

-> See: and follow the way of him who turns to Me , now, some may say Bukhari and Muslim were humble to Allah, well, but we did not see them to confirm that, nor that they are the only humbled ones whom we should follow, rather any humble one, and sure any humble one does not have to write a book for us to follow, rather we take him an example for being humble to Allah, see how it is stated in this verse: and follow the way of him who turns to Me,, a clear example is the believing man during Moses time who was hiding his belief fearing Firon, however at a certain time, he revealed his belief without worrying about the consequence of Firon anger, in fact he even asked the people to follow him:

And he who believed said: O my people! Follow me, I will guide you to the right course;

[The Quran ;]

40:38 وقال الذي امن يا قوم اتبعون اهدكم سبيل الرشاد

-> See how clear it is: And he who believed said: O my people! Follow me, I will guide you to the right course , of course the people at that time can see that man and can judge if he was a humble one that they may follow or not.

continue below....

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

Clearly, following others is following their footsteps in the belief in Allah, not following them in what books they have wrote, for example here is Ibrahim telling his father to follow him:

O my father! Surely the knowledge has come to me which has not come to you, therefore follow me, I will guide you to an even path.

[The Quran ; 19:43]

يا ابت اني قد جاءني من العلم ما لم ياتك فاتبعني اهدك صراطا سويا

-> See: therefore follow me, I will guide you to an even path.

And here is Harun telling the Jews the same:

And certainly Harun said to them before: O my people! You are only been tried by it, and indeed, your Lord is the Compassionate, therefore follow me and obey my command.

[The Quran ; 20:90]

ولقد قال لهم هارون من قبل يا قوم انما فتنتم به وان ربكم الرحمن فاتبعوني واطيعوا امري

-> See: therefore follow me and obey my command , certainly prophet Harun was not telling them to follow books that he wrote down and were not sent by Allah, impossible.

And Jesus too, he commanded the people to follow him, in this verse Allah is telling us about the true followers of Jesus and their reward:

And when Allah said: O Isa, I am going to cause you to die and cause you to ascend unto Me and purify you of those who disbelieved and am making those who followed you above those who disbelieved until the day of resurrection; then to Me shall be your return, and l will decide between you concerning that in which you disagree.

[The Quran ; 3:55]

اذ قال الله يا عيسى اني متوفيك ورافعك الي ومطهرك من الذين كفروا وجاعل الذين اتبعوك فوق الذين كفروا الى يوم القيامه ثم الي مرجعكم فاحكم بينكم فيما كنتم فيه تختلفون

-> See what Allah is telling Jesus regarding those who followed him: and am making those who followed you above those who disbelieved until the day of resurrection Certainly Jesus did have man made books of hadith for his followers to follow, rather the Injil that Allah sent down to him. Now, if you look around you, you should see that all Christians claim to be the followers of Jesus, same with Muslims, they all claim to be the followers of Mohammed, the striking similarity between them is that they think that they are followers of those prophets while the fact remains intact, that all those Mushrikoon are not following their prophets, RATHER THEY ARE FOLLOWING WHAT THEIR CONFUSED ULAMAA WROTE DOWN TO THEM. The confused Mushrik Muslims follow their many man made books of hadith, and likewise the confused Christians follow their many man made books that is called NT. Non of them is actually following the words of Allah that were revealed/sent down by Him.

All prophets must be obeyed and followed, Mohammed was no exception in this, see this verse:

And We did not send any messenger but that he should be obeyed by Allah's permission; and had they, when they dealt unjustly with themselves, come to you and asked forgiveness of Allah, and the messenger had asked forgiveness for them, they would have found Allah Relenting, Merciful.

[The Quran ; 4:64]

وما ارسلنا من رسول الا ليطاع باذن الله ولو انهم اذ ظلموا انفسهم جاؤوك فاستغفروا الله واستغفر لهم الرسول لوجدوا الله توابا رحيما

-> See: And We did not send any messenger but that he should be obeyed by Allah's permission , see, even Mohammed was following and obeying the message of Ibrahim, therefore if we do the same, then we are followers and obedient to the commands of Allah.

In the following verse, we read that those unjust people when they face the music of death, they will ask Allah to delay their death so they follow the MESSENGERS:

And warn people of a day when the torture will come to them, then those who did injustice will say: O our Lord! Delay us to a near term, we will answer Your call and follow the messengers. Had you not sworn before that there will be for you no removal.

[The Quran ; 14:44]

وانذر الناس يوم ياتيهم العذاب فيقول الذين ظلموا ربنا اخرنا الي اجل قريب نجب دعوتك ونتبع الرسل اولم تكونوا اقسمتم من قبل ما لكم من زوال

-> See: those who did injustice will say: O our Lord! Delay us to a near term, we will answer Your call and follow the messengers , can you see that the word Messengers is plural, i.e. all messengers should have been followed by all people, not just Mohammed, and I can assure you that all messengers with the exception of Mohammed, never had those man made books describing how they pissed, how they ate, and how they slept with their wives.

Another example is prophet Nuh, he commanded his people to follow him, however they did not and followed something else, let’s have a look:

Nuh said: My Lord! Indeed, they have disobeyed me and followed him whose wealth and children have added to him nothing but loss.

[The Quran ; 71:21]

قال نوح رب انهم عصوني واتبعوا من لم يزده ماله وولده الا خسارا

-> See: Nuh said: My Lord! Indeed, they have disobeyed me and followed him whose wealth and children have added to him nothing but loss. From this verse we can clearly conclude that following the prophets is following their message, while disobeying the prophets must render the people unbelievers, it is black or white, no grey color in here, however those who chose to follow the messengers can not shirk with the message anything, doing so will create many shades of grey that will only result in confusion after confusion with the final outcome that they will secure their pits in hell, if we choose to follow the messengers then we should only follow what Allah sent with them, because it is not really following the messengers, it is all about following Allah, therefore if we follow the messengers in what Allah has sent with them then we will be following Allah alone. Let’s look at the following 2 verses to clarify this very important point:

The example below is hypothetical, i.e. it would have never happened, in this verse, Allah is telling us that if He had punished any people without sending a messenger to them, they would have cried like cowards and asked Him that if He has sent a messenger to them, they would have followed something, let’s see what that something is:

And had We destroyed them with torture before this, they would have said: O our Lord! Why did You not send to us a messenger so we would have followed Your signs before we were humiliated and disgraced?

[The Quran ; 20:134]

ولو انا اهلكناهم بعذاب من قبله لقالوا ربنا لولا ارسلت الينا رسولا فنتبع اياتك من قبل ان نذل ونخزي

-> See the hypothetical example: And had We destroyed them with torture before this, they would have said: O our Lord! Why did You not send to us a messenger , now you expect that they would continue saying: so we follow him, but they did not say so, rather: so we would have followed Your signs before we were humiliated and disgraced, see how clear it is, they did not ask for a messenger to follow him, rather asked for a messenger to follow the signs of Allah, i.e. we should only follow the messengers in all the sings from Allah they brought in, not following them in how they piss, or how they eat, or how they sleep with their wives, it just does not make sense to follow them in everything they did in their daily lives, and if it does make sense to follow them in how they piss, how they eat and how they slept with their wives, then the sense must be IDOL WORSHIPPINHG

The same message is repeated again:

And were it not that there should befall them a disaster for what their hands have sent before, then they should say: Our Lord! Why did You not send to us a messenger so we would have followed Your signs and been of the believers!

[The Quran ; 28:47]

ولولا ان تصيبهم مصيبة بما قدمت ايديهم فيقولوا ربنا لولا ارسلت الينا رسولا فنتبع اياتك ونكون من المؤمنين

-> See: Why did You not send to us a messenger so we would have followed Your signs , SEE HOW THEY DID NOT SAY: SO WE FOLLOW THEM, this means that following the message of all prophets is the exact same as following Allah signs, this only apply if we follow the prophets in what Allah sent with the messengers, certainly, how they pissed was not a sign from Allah, how they ate, was not a sign from Allah and how they slept with their women was not a sign of Allah, therefore those confused humans who want to follow Mohammed, in how he pissed, how he ate, how he grew a beard, and how he slept with his wives, are nothing but a bunch of idol worshippers, it is exactly the same as those who take the singers or the sports heroes as idols, by wearing what they wear or doing things in life like as they do exactly.

Prophet Shuaib also asked the people to follow him, while the opposition was asking the people not to follow him:

And the chiefs who have disbelieved from among his people said: If you follow Shuaib, then certainly you shall be losers.

[The Quran ; 7:90]

وقال الملا الذين كفروا من قومه لئن اتبعتم شعيبا انكم اذا لخاسرون

-> See: And the chiefs who have disbelieved from among his people said: If you follow Shuaib, then certainly you shall be losers. SEE HOW WITH EVERY PROPHET/MESSENGER, the people should have followed them, Mohammed is no exception, and most certainly Shuaib did not have such man made books of hadith about him for the people to follow.

Prophet Hud too, asked the people to follow him, yet they did not, rather followed the command of every stubborn tyrant:

And that was Ad; they denied the signs of their Lord, and disobeyed His messengers and followed the command of every stubborn tyrant.

[The Quran ; 11:59]

وتلك عاد جحدوا بايات ربهم وعصوا رسله واتبعوا امر كل جبار عنيد

-> See: And that was Ad; they denied the signs of their Lord, and disobeyed His messengers and followed the command of every stubborn tyrant.

Those people who like to follow the humans in things that Allah never sent, come in masses over the history, for example the people of Musa, instead of following him they followed Firon:

To Pharaoh and his chiefs, but they followed the command of Pharaoh, and the command of Pharaoh was not guided

[The Quran ; 11:97]

الي فرعون وملئه فاتبعوا امر فرعون وما امر فرعون برشيد

-> See: but they followed the command of Pharaoh

Following the message of belief does not really need a book, for example, people who are not believers after hearing the message, are following Satan, and as we know Satan has no books for them to follow:

Indeed, My servants, you have over them no authority except those who follow you from among the deviators.

[The Quran ;15:42]

ان عبادي ليس لك عليهم سلطان الا من اتبعك من الغاوين

-> See what Allah is telling Satan: except those who follow you from among the deviators. And indeed, many follow Satan without reading any book:

And certainly the Shaitan found true his conjecture concerning them, so they follow him, except a party of the believers.

[The Quran ; 34:20]

ولقد صدق عليهم ابليس ظنه فاتبعوه الا فريقا من المؤمنين

-> See: And certainly the Shaitan found true his conjecture concerning them, so they follow him, except a party of the believers. Certainly Satan never produced a book for those deviators to follow, yet they are called FOLLOWERS

See how for following Satan, it does not need to follow any books, an example of such people are the enemy of Islam on FFI web site http://www.forum09.faithfreedom.org/index.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , who argue about Allah on a daily basis, and guess what, they too are followers, the followers of Satan that is:

And of the people is he who disputes about Allah without knowledge, and follows every rebellious Shaitan;

[The Quran ; 22:3]

ومن الناس من يجادل في الله بغير علم ويتبع كل شيطان مريد

-> See: And of the people is he who disputes about Allah without knowledge, and follows every rebellious Shaitan

Let me show you an example of following the prophet:

And thus We have made you a moderate nation that you may be witnesses against the people and the messenger may be a witness against you; and We did not make the Qiblah that you observed in the past except that We know who follows the messenger from the one who turns back upon his heels, and it was surely huge except for those whom Allah has guided; and it is not for Allah to make your faith of no value; indeed Allah is Kind and Merciful to all the people.

[The Quran ; 2:143]

وكذلك جعلناكم امه وسطا لتكونوا شهداء على الناس ويكون الرسول عليكم شهيدا وما جعلنا القبله التي كنت عليها الا لنعلم من يتبع الرسول ممن ينقلب على عقبيه وان كانت لكبيره الا على الذين هدى الله وما كان الله ليضيع ايمانكم ان الله بالناس لرؤوف رحيم

-> See above, Allah has changed the Qiblah, now Mohammed should have delivered such message which is already stated in the Quran that it was a command from Allah to change the Qiblah, why you think that Allah commanded to change the Qiblah? To expose those who are the true followers of the prophet or not, see: and We did not make the Qiblah that you observed in the past except that We know who follows the messenger from the one who turns back upon his heels . Certainly I followed the messenger as many people did in such Qiblah aspect, an aspect that is clearly a command from Allah, yet Allah is referring to it as if it was a command from Mohammed that we should follow him through, HOW CLEAR. This means that we should only follow Mohammed in what Allah has commanded him, not in how he ate, not in how he pissed and not in how he slept with his wives, now, for those who like to take Mohammed as an idol in all these activates, then I have bad news for them, they are rendered IDOL WORSHIPPERS.

The striking fact of the matter is this, not only the people should follow the messengers, but they may also follow other believers, let’s see this example which is directed at the believers:

And if you invite them to the guidance, they will not follow you; it is the same to you whether you invite them or you are silent.

[The Quran ; 7:193]

وان تدعوهم الي الهدي لا يتبعوكم سواء عليكم ادعوتموهم ام انتم صامتون

-> See what Allah is telling all the believers: And if you (plural) invite them to the guidance, they will not follow you (plural), I have added the word (plural) in brackets so those who know no Arabic understand that the message is for the believers and not for Mohammed alone, this verse clearly proves that not only Mohammed or other prophets that should be followed, rather all those who call for the way of Allah should be followed. Mohammed was no expectation.

Now, if we want to follow other people who call for the way of Allah, then they must be calling for the way of Allah, if we follow them in anything else except the call for Allah, then I can assure you that following most of those on earth will lead their followers astray:

And if you obey most of those in the earth, they will lead you astray from way of Allah; indeed they do not follow but conjecture and indeed they are only mute.

[The Quran ; 6:116]

وان تطع اكثر من في الارض يضلوك عن سبيل الله ان يتبعون الا الظن وان هم الا يخرصون

-> See: And if you obey most of those in the earth, they will lead you astray from way of Allah; , why is that you reckon? Because those people who use other man made crap books of hadith or other man made books only follow conjectures, see: indeed they do not follow but conjecture and indeed they are only mute. I honestly cannot wait until that day, when all those man made hadith worshippers will be mute.

Now, if we are talking about following the sayings of others (not the words of Allah), then Allah told us clearly in His Quran that we should FOLLOW the best of sayings:

Those who listen to the saying, then follow the best of it; those are they whom Allah has guided, and those it is who are the men of understanding.

[The Quran ; 39:18]

الذين يستمعون القول فيتبعون احسنه اولئك الذين هداهم الله واولئك هم اولوا الالباب

-> See: Those who listen to the saying, then follow the best of it; , certainly all these man made books of hadith are the sayings of all these people, it can not be the saying of Allah, therefore according to 39:18, the believers in Allah are permitted to reject many of these hadith sayings that can not be the best of sayings, how the following can be the best of saying:

1- The allegation that the prophet married Aysha when she was 6 years old, which does not make any sense.
2- The allegation that the prophet used to sleep with all his wives in an hour of a day or an hour of a night while not having a bath in between, which contradict the Quran
3- The allegation to drink camel urine, which does not make any sense
4- The allegation of stoning the adulterers, which contradicts the Quran
5- The allegation of killing the apostates, which contradicts the Quran.
6- The allegation that the prophet used to drink wine, which contradicts the Quran

I can keep listing many of such crap and non sense that are only found in the man made crap books of hadith.

There is only one criteria to be able to judge if any saying is bad, good or best, the criteria is simply to compare all such conjectures with the Quran, if it violates it the slightest then such saying can not be best, nor even good, rather a clear cut bad saying that much be rejected and dismissed in the nearest rubbish bin, yet you see most of those Muslims upholding such non sense as if it is from other divine books next to the book of Allah, would that be a type of SHIRK? I say it has to be if you read the following verse:

And most of them do not believe in Allah except while they are polytheists.

[The Quran ; 12:106]

وما يؤمن اكثرهم بالله الا وهم مشركون

-> Now, 12:106 is very clear, it is talking about those who claim to believe in Allah, i.e. the Muslims must be included, the context of the above verse has to apply to all humanity, in fact it applies more to the Muslims who boldly claim to believe in Allah, they are indeed believers, that is what 12:106 is telling us, however the same verse is telling us that they are Mushrikoon at the same time, now many of them may say, but the Muslims claim no other god next to Allah, well, I have very bad news for them, Shirk is many types, the most obvious one is to claim that there is another god with Allah, even children should know that, and I agree that the Muslims do not belong to the polytheists of that type, however they certainly belong to the following Mushrikoon:

Or have they associates who have prescribed for them in the religion that which Allah does not sanction? And were it not for the word of judgment, decision would have certainly been given between them; and surely the unjust shall have a painful punishment.

[The Quran ; 42:21]

ام لهم شركاء شرعوا لهم من الدين ما لم ياذن به الله ولولا كلمة الفصل لقضي بينهم وان الظالمين لهم عذاب اليم

-> One of the sectarian sunni Muslims whom I debated over a year ago and confronted him with the above verse, he came back with a lame and stupid reply, he told me that 42:21 does not say that following the books of hadith is Shirk, to be honest, I just dismissed him on the fly, I have no time for such stubborn and confused people, and ironically I am not inviting them to the way of Allah, I am only confronting them as well exposing them, see, I agree that the above verse does not say that following the man made books of hadith is shirk, HOWEVER the verse is clearly describing to us an act of shirk, the act of following what the humans prescribe in the religion that Allah never sanctioned, see: Or have they associates who have prescribed for them in the religion that which Allah does not sanction? HOW CLEAR, how many Imam, Mufti, Sheikh and Mullahs have prescribed to us in the religion what Allah never sanctioned? And from where all those associates bring their prescription? The answer should be clear, it is from their man made crap books of hadith, the books that Allah never sent down nor revealed it to the prophet. You need to read such crap books and find for yourself that at least 90% of it is pure non sense, at least 50% of those 90% are at best described as cheap episodes from Jerry Springer show. On top of that you must consider the following facts:

1- The hadith contradict itself within the same book.
2- The hadith writers contradict other hadith writers.
3- Many of the hadith in all books CLEARLY contradict Allah words.

Holy crap, surely these books can not be the straight path that Allah sent down and want us to follow, there is no straightness in it, rather confusion after confusion and contradiction after contradiction, let me give you a very clear and simple to understand example:

We have been taught that we may shorten our prayers (Taqsir Al Salat) if we travel more than 80 km or about, on the other hand Allah is telling us something else regarding Taqsir Al Salat, let’s have a look:

And if you travel in the land, then there should be no blame on you if you shorten the prayer if you feared that those who have disbelieved will cause you discord, indeed the unbelievers are your obvious enemy.

[The Quran ; 4:101]

واذا ضربتم في الارض فليس عليكم جناح ان تقصروا من الصلاة ان خفتم ان يفتنكم الذين كفروا ان الكافرين كانوا لكم عدوا مبينا

-> See how clear the reason to shorten the prayer as stated by Allah: And if you travel in the land, then there should be no blame on you if you shorten the prayer if you feared that those who have disbelieved will cause you discord, i.e. IF ONLY THE UNBELIEVERS IN SUCH LAND MAY CAUSE DISCORD TO US WHEN THEY SEE US PRAYING, it has absolutely nothing to do with distances, rather the fear that the unbelievers in such land where we travelled will try to cause discord to you, it can be even in next town 5 Km away, and certainly if I travel 1000 km to a land where its people will not cause discord to me when they see me praying, then there is absolutely no shortening in my prayer.

The above example proves the stupidity and ignorance of most Muslims, you know why they are so stupid and ignorant when it comes to the religion, because they are blindly following what their parents taught them, fine accept what your parent teach you, but as long as it does not contradict or manipulate what Allah has commanded regarding the same matter, now if you do and take such non sense of a reason to shorten the prayer, then I am sorry to tell you that 42:21 must apply to you, because YOU FOLLOWED WHAT THESE PEOPLE PRESCRIBED IN THE RELIGION THAT ALLAH NEVER SANCTIONED, and in this case of shortening the prayer, Allah even sanctioned something else that is totally ignored by all those Muslims who shorten their prayer, I am telling you, these people must be Mushrikoon along their belief. It cannot get more obvious for Allah sake.

Here you have it, the actions of all those confused Muslims caused a retarded punk of a kafir like Khalil Fariel of FFI to come and have balls to say all his crap that you can not be a Muslim without believing in the books of hadith, as if the retarded punk know what a Muslim is, however I have to excuse such punk because in my last 25 years of life I have discovered the fact that most Muslims do not know what a Muslim mean, that is because they ignored the Quran and only pondered upon the man made crap books of hadith, this is obvious if you go to any mosque on Friday prayer and listen to the khutbah i.e. Speech of all those confused Imams, all they talk about is, hadith, hadith, hadith hadith, and Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed, very sickening indeed, you know why I called it as such, well let me show you the next verse:

And the mosques belong to Allah, so do not call with Allah anyone.

[The Quran ; 72:18]

وان المساجد لله فلا تدعوا مع الله احدا

-> How clear again, I say yeh those Imams mention the name of the Allah, BUT ONLY WHEN THEY PRAISE MOHAMMED, i.e. when they mention Mohammed, they say Salla Allah Alaihi Wa Salam, see in the process of praising Mohammed, they mentioned Allah, WITHOUT PRAISINSG ALLAH, in fact if you read the English writings of many of those confused Muslims, you will always see most of them writing the word Mohammed then after it in brackets (SAWS), i.e. the confused freaks abbreviated the name of Allah to the letter A while writing the name of Mohammed complete, HOW DUMB AND CONFUSED THEY ARE. The Arab writers are as confused as those English writers, when they write Mohammed in Arabic you see after it straight away in very tiny font and the words on top of each other ‘Salla Allah Alaihi Wa Salam’ in Arabic, you can barely ready the word Allah in it, or they just write the letter ‘Sad’ between brackets, you can see a sample on this web site http://www.tibneen.com/Mohammad.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , how clear that those confused Muslims are clearly Mushrikoon and idol worshippers of Mohammed.

you know why those Mushrikoon shorten the words Salla Allah Alaihi Wa Salam because they mention Mohammed zillions of times in like 15 minutes speech or one page document, they have to bloody shorten it, otherwise when you try to read such writing it may look like that it is the only sentence in there Salla Allah Alaihi Wa Salam, regardless of my joke, the fact remains intact that they also mention the name of Allah zillions of times while when they praise Mohammed, while absolutely not caring to praise Him the slightest, all they care about is to praise Mohammed, let me show you the next verse and see for yourself the striking similarity:

And when Allah alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the hereafter shrink, and when those other than Him are mentioned, at once, they are joyful.

[The Quran ; 39:45]

واذا ذكر الله وحده اشمازت قلوب الذين لا يؤمنون بالاخرة واذا ذكر الذين من دونه اذا هم يستبشرون

-> See the striking similarity: And when Allah alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the hereafter shrink, and when those other than Him are mentioned, at once, they are joyful. I agree that the verse above is talking about those who do not believe in the hereafter, while all those confused Muslims claim to believe in the hereafter, however how we know that those Muslims really believe in the hereafter, see these verses:

2:8 And of the people, some who say: We believe in Allah and the last day; and they are not believers.
2:9 They deceive Allah and those who believed, and they deceive not but themselves; and they do not perceive.

[The Quran ; 2:8-9]

2:8 ومن الناس من يقول امنا بالله وباليوم الاخر وما هم بمؤمنين
2:9 يخادعون الله والذين امنوا وما يخدعون الا انفسهم وما يشعرون

-> How clear again: And of the people, some who say: We believe in Allah and the last day; and they are not believers. , the problem is for them, THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW IT, see: They deceive Allah and those who believed, and they deceive not but themselves; and they do not perceive.

There is no more for me to say, but only for now, I have far, far more to say and I have been saying it for the last 5 years, yet to see one of those who call themselves Muslims, to prove me wrong, but of course by using the Quran only, their man made crap books of hadith can not be admissible as a religious evidence due to its massive flaws.

What is said by FFI retard ‘Khalil Fariel’ is supposed to be his part 1 where he presented 2 Quran verses as his suppose to be compelling evidences that you cannot be a Muslim without following the man made books of hadith , apparently he is working on part 2, but I say, the best course of action he should do after finishing it, is to shove it up his, or up the one for all those confused Muslims, and if he can shove it in both, it will be very much appreciated by me.

Salam

User avatar
Ki Santoso Sejati
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:19 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by Ki Santoso Sejati »

you said books of hadith can not be admissible as a religious evidence due to its massive flaws. Don't you know that most of islam rituals such as shalat and pilgrimage to mecca is based on hadith
Ki Santoso Sejati Dukun Palsu Penipu

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

Ki Santoso Sejati wrote:you said books of hadith can not be admissible as a religious evidence due to its massive flaws. Don't you know that most of islam rituals such as shalat and pilgrimage to mecca is based on hadith
Why don't u bring those hadith that teach me those rituals in here and I let u know if I accept them or not

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

Ki Santoso Sejati wrote:you said books of hadith can not be admissible as a religious evidence due to its massive flaws. Don't you know that most of islam rituals such as shalat and pilgrimage to mecca is based on hadith
You sound a bit confused, I said they are not admissable as evindeces to PROVE ME WRONG

User avatar
KhaliL
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 am

Congratulations to Ahmed Bahgat

Post by KhaliL »

________________________________

Hello Ahmed Bahgat,


First of all congratulations..! You demolished my first writing in this series with your superior knowledge of Quran. Indeed this is a great performance.

I will thank Ahmed for his time now though he does not seem to have taken much time to compose such knock-out stuff. I posted it earlier yesterday and Ahmed came with refutation within a short period of time. And after Ahmed posted it, all these times I was reading and thinking of the way of refuting it. But I could not find any way to counter those arguments. It is not easy to refute a solid argument if presented with enough back up sources. And to be frank,. If proven wrong, I have no problem in admitting it and here when it is Ahmed Bahgat as my contester, I do not consider this as a disgrace. Losing to a knowledgeable person is not a disgrace if our position is weak.

All that said Ahmed, I will keep the opening post there though it is largely refuted by you. It must remain there for readers to go through and to get the story. But I have a request to you here: Since most of the readers will not be going through lengthy posts they will only read first few lines of your post and abandon it. So, you may edit your post to shorten it. To be frank, the first verse (3:68) you brought is sufficient to prove your case. (I am sure you know that but was only adding more stuffs to strengthen it but that is not necessary as you think.) You made your case handsomely using 3:68, so my suggestion is: your points will be more pronounced if you can just keep a few verses and erase the rest. If needed you have your website to post the full version for further uses.., (Why do not you consider submitting some of your papers in academic faculties? If you craft them neatly by obliterating punk, jerk, arse :x kinds of ad hominem stuffs, I am sure, you can broaden your credentials.

And, I should not be arrogant here so let me say: if anyone can defend my contention and refute Ahmed Bahgat, they are welcome. My failure does not mean all else will. There are brilliant people around and who knows they will have a way to prove Ahmed wrong..!

I abandon this thread since it does not make sense to add my second line of arguments here in the same. This thread now belongs to Ahmed Bahgat because he is the winner. I will start another thread with my remaining arguments on why Quran only approach is flawed. First argument is refuted but more still remain with me. But I understand I have to be more careful so, I will wait before posting. (I am sure; Ahmed Bahgat will come up there too) :) LOL

Regards and thank you Ahmed for your time, I stay corrected in this thread.

KF
Last edited by KhaliL on Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Congratulations to Ahmed Bahgat

Post by AhmedBahgat »

KhaliL FarieL wrote:________________________________

Hello Ahmed Bahgat,


First of all congratulations..! You demolished my first writing in this series with your superior knowledge of Quran. Indeed this is a great performance.

Hello

Because you acted decently despite my insults I decided to remove you from the CCCLDFFI list, this is life, you respect others, you should be respected, nothing really for me to add, as i yet to read your comment

antineoETC
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by antineoETC »

AhmedBahgat wrote:One of the filthy, retarded, confused and shameless kafir on FFI (Khalil Fariel) is still promoting his ignorance desiring that the Muslims should uphold the crap called hadith, this is what the filthy has to say:

The retarded kafir Khlail Fariel said on FFI:
Firstly AB, Why do you feel the need to describe the forum member Khalil Fariel with such epithets as those I have highlighted above? Has he ever referred to you in such language?
It is in the nature of wasp nests that some of their inhabitants are bound to sting someone. The closer you are to are to a wasp nest the more likely you are to get stung, sometimes fatally. Who would encourage wasps to establish a nest in their house?

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by AhmedBahgat »

antineoETC wrote:
AhmedBahgat wrote:One of the filthy, retarded, confused and shameless kafir on FFI (Khalil Fariel) is still promoting his ignorance desiring that the Muslims should uphold the crap called hadith, this is what the filthy has to say:

The retarded kafir Khlail Fariel said on FFI:
Firstly AB, Why do you feel the need to describe the forum member Khalil Fariel with such epithets as those I have highlighted above? Has he ever referred to you in such language?

That's between me and him, please piss off

antineoETC
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by antineoETC »

AhmedBahgat wrote:
antineoETC wrote:
AhmedBahgat wrote:One of the filthy, retarded, confused and shameless kafir on FFI (Khalil Fariel) is still promoting his ignorance desiring that the Muslims should uphold the crap called hadith, this is what the filthy has to say:

The retarded kafir Khlail Fariel said on FFI:
Firstly AB, Why do you feel the need to describe the forum member Khalil Fariel with such epithets as those I have highlighted above? Has he ever referred to you in such language?

That's between me and him, please piss off
AB. I do think this propensity of yours towards gratuitous rudeness and bad language needs to be understood. Is your view of Khalil Fariel as "filthy" and "retarded" informed by your "holy book" al-Qur'an?
It is in the nature of wasp nests that some of their inhabitants are bound to sting someone. The closer you are to are to a wasp nest the more likely you are to get stung, sometimes fatally. Who would encourage wasps to establish a nest in their house?

antineoETC
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:53 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible?

Post by antineoETC »

Anyhows, AB, could you please render the following into an english form acceptable to your good self?:

Laqad Kāna Lakum Fī Rasūli Allāhi 'Uswatun Ĥasanatun Liman Kāna Yarjū Allāha Wa Al-Yawma Al-'Ākhira Wa Dhakara Allāha Kathīrāan (Qur'an: 33.21)


Thanks
It is in the nature of wasp nests that some of their inhabitants are bound to sting someone. The closer you are to are to a wasp nest the more likely you are to get stung, sometimes fatally. Who would encourage wasps to establish a nest in their house?

User avatar
AhmedBahgat
Posts: 3094
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Congratulations to Ahmed Bahgat

Post by AhmedBahgat »

KhaliL FarieL wrote:I will thank Ahmed for his time now though he does not seem to have taken much time to compose such knock-out stuff.
No worries, however when it comes to the Quran, it has my first priority, I also enjoy my Quran study, I started at 3 PM and finished by 2:00 AM or about, I only had 1 hours break to translate the 20 verses a day that I have to do
KhaliL FarieL wrote: I posted it earlier yesterday and Ahmed came with refutation within a short period of time.
My software Access Quran helped me great deal in shottening it to less than one day, if I was using the web to look for the verses it would have taken me at least 2 days, I am still gettin used to use my Application though
KhaliL FarieL wrote: And after Ahmed posted it, all these times I was reading and thinking of the way of refuting it. But I could not find any way to counter those arguments. It is not easy to refute a solid argument if presented with enough back up sources. And to be frank,. If proven wrong, I have no problem in admitting it and here when it is Ahmed Bahgat as my contester, I do not consider this as a disgrace. Losing to a knowledgeable person is not a disgrace if our position is weak.
And to be frank, I was not really aiming at refuting you, I was aiming more at refuting the confused Muslims, the article is posted on Facebook also, and all my network of family and friends received a copy of it, I had to format it to suit facebook though but with find and replace it took 2 minutes, back to the point, let me just say that I used you to refute the confused Muslims
KhaliL FarieL wrote:All that said Ahmed, I will keep the opening post there though it is largely refuted by you. It must remain there for readers to go through and to get the story. But I have a request to you here: Since most of the readers will not be going through lengthy posts they will only read first few lines of your post and abandon it. So, you may edit your post to shorten it. To be frank, the first verse (3:31) you brought is sufficient to prove your case. (I am sure you know that but was only adding more stuffs to strengthen it but that is not necessary as you think.) You made your case handsomely using 3:31, so my suggestion is: your points will be more pronounced if you can just keep a few verses and erase the rest. If needed you have your website to post the full version for further uses..,
The point is, my writings are directed at those who will read it, it is not directed at those who will not read it in full, this put me in the driving seat as for any to refute, they must refute all the verses I posted, that is if they are keen to refute as I have been.

Another point also is my writings are also directed at me, i.e. I read my writings and enjoy reading it, that is how I keep dicovering my typos and sh!t and keep fixing them, the objective of that is to solidify my Quran knowledge so if I ever debate anyone especially from the confused Muslims, then I must be ready to answer everything they say while proving them wrong at the same time, this can not happen unless I know the message of every Quran verse as i know my name, and this can't happen without my lengthy writings, so far I do not know every message of each verse as i know my name, what I mean is not memorising it, rather understanidng the message, and by goiong through every word in each verse numerous times, I guess it has to be of a help if I ever confront one of those hard core sectarians
KhaliL FarieL wrote:(Why do not you consider submitting some of your papers in academic faculties?
I am not really aiming at that while I of course love to do it, I am just following the flow through my Quran study and whatever happen in the future is in the hand of Allah.
KhaliL FarieL wrote: If you craft them neatly by obliterating punk, jerk, arse :x kinds of ad hominem stuffs, I am sure, you can broaden your credentials.
Of course I am always considering that and I can do it with ease, I just enjoy my freedom of speech as well dealing with many kafirs enemy of Islam has affected me and made me that aggressive, i guess the solution for me is to stay away from their web sites and just refute them on my web site, on the other hand i look at it really in a different way and more practical way, see, you may consider me gordon ramsy of the religions, in fact if gordon was not swearing that hard, no one would have ever known and loved him, in addition to that I hate pretending to be someting else to gain credit or admiration, if anyone will give me any credit or admire my work then it has to be because I was being myself.
KhaliL FarieL wrote:And, I should not be arrogant here so let me say: if anyone can defend my contention and refute Ahmed Bahgat, they are welcome. My failure does not mean all else will. There are brilliant people around and who knows they will have a way to prove Ahmed wrong..!
Well, I really do not look at it this way, the way of win and defeat, I careless if I am considered a loser or a winner in the eyes of any one but myself, and myself here is controlled but what Allah told me to do, it is not really accoridng to myself.
KhaliL FarieL wrote:I abandon this thread since it does not make sense to add my second line of arguments here in the same. This thread now belongs to Ahmed Bahgat because he is the winner. I will start another thread with my remaining arguments on why Quran only approach is flawed. First argument is refuted but more still remain with me. But I understand I have to be more careful so, I will wait before posting. (I am sure; Ahmed Bahgat will come up there too) :) LOL
Again, this is not about winning or losing in my eyes, you have posted many things and i never replied to it, however I was motivated in this thread because you were trying to flaw my own belief, which again I proved was not accoridng to my own, rather accoridng to what Allah said and what the common sense suggest.
KhaliL FarieL wrote: Regards and thank you Ahmed for your time, I stay corrected in this thread.

KF
No worries, let's keep it clean

User avatar
skynightblaze
Posts: 3920
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by skynightblaze »

AhmedBahgat wrote:
myArseAblaze wrote:I believe in proving muslims wrong in a practical way than the textual way .

. Out of all the devout muslims i ask one muslim to come forward and write a single statement defaming their prophet. All i need is 1 out of so many devout muslims and that too writing a single statement. Our ARSE LOVER DISMISSED ME on the challenge that I issued to him . HE still doesnt know what to say about this challenge.If none of the devout muslims of today can even think of defaming prophet then what makes them think in their fantasy world of bukhari lying entirely?

Muslims might even come with a counter question as to what is the guarantee that Bukhari was indeed a devout muslim.Even this can be practically debunked . SO we should ask the muslim to come up with another exercise in that case.

How many muslims are ready to promote ALi sina the liars book " Understanding Muhhamad" for understanding details about their glorious prophet muhhamad for the next 1400 centuries to come?

Do you all see the stupidity of the muslim argument? Would any muslim promote Ali sina 's book as a source for understanding muhhamad ? IF not how could they accuse the other devout muslims during Bukhari's time to promote his book of hadiths when he was lying and talking nonsense about their beloved prophet?


In the light of the above it can be proven that hadiths werent forged as our ARSE LOVER BELIEVES.
Listen, myArseAblaze

what sort of challenge is that you stupid freak?

Of course no Muslims will even acceot such challenge, not only for Mohammed, but for any other prophet as well, why we shoould defame any of the noble prophets you kafir bound to hell?, do you think that the true Muslims or even the confused Muslims are as confused as the Christians?

You are dismissed again, punk
What a high class professional esteemed friend you are!! You have just slam dunked yourself just Like how Muhhamad slam dunked himself on many occassions in the quran and I congratulate you for that.Re Read the part in red and NOW TELL US wHY WOULD BUKHARI DEFAME MUHHAMAD BY SAYING THAT HE f.cked A KID OF 9 YEARS?? Wasnt he a muslim you fool?
Look around yourself and you'll find people with virtues are never required to demand respect since they automatically earn it. It is only those that are devoid of any virtues need to threaten and bully to gain respect. Needless to say that quran cannot be from God.

User avatar
Nihilist
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:42 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by Nihilist »

skynightblaze wrote:
AhmedBahgat wrote:
myArseAblaze wrote:I believe in proving muslims wrong in a practical way than the textual way .

. Out of all the devout muslims i ask one muslim to come forward and write a single statement defaming their prophet. All i need is 1 out of so many devout muslims and that too writing a single statement. Our ARSE LOVER DISMISSED ME on the challenge that I issued to him . HE still doesnt know what to say about this challenge.If none of the devout muslims of today can even think of defaming prophet then what makes them think in their fantasy world of bukhari lying entirely?

Muslims might even come with a counter question as to what is the guarantee that Bukhari was indeed a devout muslim.Even this can be practically debunked . SO we should ask the muslim to come up with another exercise in that case.

How many muslims are ready to promote ALi sina the liars book " Understanding Muhhamad" for understanding details about their glorious prophet muhhamad for the next 1400 centuries to come?

Do you all see the stupidity of the muslim argument? Would any muslim promote Ali sina 's book as a source for understanding muhhamad ? IF not how could they accuse the other devout muslims during Bukhari's time to promote his book of hadiths when he was lying and talking nonsense about their beloved prophet?


In the light of the above it can be proven that hadiths werent forged as our ARSE LOVER BELIEVES.
Listen, myArseAblaze

what sort of challenge is that you stupid freak?

Of course no Muslims will even acceot such challenge, not only for Mohammed, but for any other prophet as well, why we shoould defame any of the noble prophets you kafir bound to hell?, do you think that the true Muslims or even the confused Muslims are as confused as the Christians?

You are dismissed again, punk
What a high class professional esteemed friend you are!! You have just slam dunked yourself just Like how Muhhamad slam dunked himself on many occassions in the quran and I congratulate you for that.Re Read the part in red and NOW TELL US wHY WOULD BUKHARI DEFAME MUHHAMAD BY SAYING THAT HE f.cked A KID OF 9 YEARS?? Wasnt he a muslim you fool?
Obviously, this Ahmed guy thinks he can avoid the embarrassment of admitting what his prophet was, 1300 years after his death. N then he goes around calling Bukhari a complete fame-monger who went against his prophet's wish that anyone write anything other than the Quran. If truth it is, why not all muslims just chuck the hadiths completely n start looking at Quran independently without any context? When it says, "we have made lawful to you, what we haven't made for others", people can say it addressed them and that they can do anything as its been made lawful to them! What more? Bukhari once threw 500 gold coins from a boat when the boat rover greedily accused him of stealing his own gold. That brings him questions about his character! Assuming that Bukhari DID steal it from the boatman, he stole once in his life. The killing of innocent men n raping women didn't do though! Hadiths are said to be spoken, but not written? Ahmed dude, you think your prophet had brains to build his own recording equipment?! Why write the Quran then?! Just memorise (which some of you fanatics end up doing anyways)! Who wrote the Quran? Mo did? Who then did write the Quran? His followers .. The very same followers who also testified to his lifestyle and his life .. How would you comprehend verses from that plagiarized piece of ramble if you don't know the events that happened in his life? How would you know the all-important "CONTEXT" that all you muslims harp about, everytime we quote out of the Quran? Make the Mullahs and Imams ban the Hadiths ..

There arises another issue see, how then would you explain verses like these -

[8:74] Those who believed and emigrated, and strove in the cause of GOD, as well as those who hosted them and gave them refuge, and supported them, these are the true believers. They have deserved forgiveness and a generous recompense.

Emigrated where? Who gave refuge? How do you explain these without the hadiths, boy?
We're knee deep in this sh!t ..

piscohot
Posts: 2187
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:16 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible? Part 1.

Post by piscohot »

AhmedBahgat wrote:And when it is said to them: Follow what Allah has sent down, they said: We shall follow what we used to from our fathers, even though their fathers do not understand a thing, nor do they follow the guidance.
[The Quran ; 2:170]

واذا قيل لهم اتبعوا ما انزل الله قالوا بل نتبع ما الفينا عليه اباءنا اولو كان اباؤهم لا يعقلون شيئا ولا يهتدون

-> It can’t get clearer than this, see: And when it is said to them: Follow what Allah has sent down, they said: We shall follow what we used to from our fathers, THAT IS EXACTLY THE CASE WITH ALL THOSE MUSHRIK MUSLIMS BOUND TO HELL, every time I tell those freaks the same Quran message: Follow what Allah has sent down , they tell me boldly, how come all the previous generations in 1400 years were wrong, i.e. they must follow what their fathers used to follow: We shall follow what we used to from our fathers , and even if their fathers were confused as hell, they still follow them, that is is the exact same as the Christians and the Jews, all bound to hell, see what Allah is telling us next: even though their fathers do not understand a thing, nor do they follow the guidance. , i.e. they are nothing but a bunch of stubborn Muzhiks who are in the process of securing their pits in hell. In fact using the same Muslim flawed argument that how come all these generations in 1400 years were flawed, then the Christian argument must be admissible too, that how come all those generations of Christians were flawed over 2000 years, if the Muslims use such flawed argument, then they should dare not to tell the Christians that their religion was flawed for 2000 years.
So Circumcision was certainly what muslims followed from their fathers and hence bound for hell.
Satan's warning-- 04:119 And most certainly I will lead them astray and excite in them vain desires, and bid them so that they shall slit the ears of the cattle, and most certainly I will bid them so that they shall alter Allah's creation; and whoever takes the Shaitan for a guardian rather than Allah he indeed shall suffer a manifest loss.

Did Allah order circumcision in the quran, Ahmed?
Quran miracle (16:69) : Bees eat ALL fruits
Quran miracle (27:18) : an ant SAID, "O ants, enter your dwellings that you not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they perceive not."

User avatar
skynightblaze
Posts: 3920
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:51 am

Re: Quran Only: Why it is not possible?

Post by skynightblaze »

@ahmed

I just have one question for you in response to Khalils argument. YOu said that you can follow Muhhamad just like Muhhamad followed Abraham. I just want to know how you are going to follow him without any of the books other than quran?
Look around yourself and you'll find people with virtues are never required to demand respect since they automatically earn it. It is only those that are devoid of any virtues need to threaten and bully to gain respect. Needless to say that quran cannot be from God.

Post Reply