More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conferen

For topics which do not fit into any of the other categories.
Post Reply
Methuselah
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:39 pm

More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conferen

Post by Methuselah »

growing number of Western countries are joining the United States and Israel in boycotting the United Nations World Conference on Racism, which opened today in Geneva, Switzerland. Australia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and New Zealand all announced they would boycott the conference soon after the US announced its formal decision not to attend Saturday. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the opening session he was “profoundly disappointed” at the boycotts. We go to Geneva to get the latest..

AMY GOODMAN: A growing number of Western countries are joining the United States and Israel in boycotting the United Nations World Conference on Racism, which opened today in Geneva, Switzerland. Australia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and New Zealand all announced they would boycott the conference soon after the US announced it formally decided not to attend on Saturday. Israel and Canada—or Israel said Canada had decided to shun the conference many months earlier. France and the UK are attending, but France says it will walk out immediately if there are racist comments made against Israel. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the opening session he was “profoundly disappointed” at the boycotts.


As the conference began, Israel said it was recalling its ambassador to Switzerland. The protest came as the Swiss president met the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is to address the UN conference later today.


The meeting is a follow-up to the first world conference to discuss racism which was held in Durban, South Africa, in August of 2001 and is meant to review progress that’s been made in the fight against racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance.


President Obama defended the boycott decision at a news conference in Trinidad on Sunday, citing concerns over adopting language from the 2001 final document and its expressions of, quote, “antagonism towards Israel.” He said participating in the conference, quote, “would have involved putting our imprimatur on something that we just don’t believe.”


I’m joined now on the telephone from Geneva by Margaret Parsons. She’s the executive director of the African Canadian Legal Clinic. She participated in the original Durban conference in 2001, as well as all the preparatory meetings for the review conference.


We welcome you to Democracy Now!, Margaret. Can you explain what has happened so far?


MARGARET PARSONS: Well, today, thank you for inviting me. Today, it was just mainly foreign ministers and other high-level officials that have brought greetings and, you know, sharing their commitment to fight and eradicate racism and other forms of discrimination. And basically, it’s been pretty calm today.


You know, NGOs have had displays, and there are different side events, voices of victims. You know, there will be side events throughout the entire week on issues like the trans-Atlantic slave trade, indigenous peoples, what’s happening with the Dalits and Romas around the world. And it’s just people just sharing what is taking place in different regions and countries globally.


AMY GOODMAN: And your reaction to the US, Israel, Canada, Australia, a number of countries pulling out of the conference?


MARGARET PARSONS: Well, we are extremely disappointed by the boycott of these Western nations. While we’re disappointed, we are not surprised, because this is about accountability. These countries have not come to the table with clean hands. They have never really meant to participate and really be held accountable for the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Program of Action, a document they all signed onto in 2001, the exception of Israel and the United States. At least the United States and Israel are being consistent in their position. However, these other countries are quite hypocritical in their withdrawal. You know, many here feel that if these countries had come, they would have received a failing grade, because they have done little to nothing to implement the Program of Action.


The Durban Declaration and Program of Action is an excellent blueprint. There was nothing in that document that was racist, anti-Semitic. It was an expression of goodwill. It was an expression of encouragement in terms of the peace process in the Middle East. And it is an excellent document and a blueprint that countries should adopt in working to eradicate racism.


AMY GOODMAN: The US and other Western countries say the draft final document contains objectionable language that could single out Israel for criticism. But all references to the Israel and the Middle East were removed from the draft document, and Palestinian civil society groups are critical of how Israel’s actions against Palestinians have now been excluded from the framework of the conference.


We’re also joined on the phone from Geneva by Ingrid Jaradat, the director of the Bethlehem-based BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights.


We welcome you to Democracy Now! Explain your response to the pullout of the United States and a number of other Western nations.


INGRID JARADAT: Well, our first response has been the question whether these governments have actually read the original documents and the draft documents, because neither the original Durban Declaration and Program of Action nor current drafts include any inciting language against Israel. In the initial Durban documents of 2001, the only time Israel is mentioned it’s mentioned as a state entitled to security like all other states. So there is no—there has never been any sort of language that could be declared racist. And it makes you really wonder which documents people are referring to when they say they are antagonistic.


And so, I would appeal to everybody who has good faith to go back to the documents and read the papers. And especially since we are dealing with a Durban review conference, it would be good to read the papers. So, that would be reaction number one, and—because much of what is now being said by governments and in the media about the debates and about the documents has no factual basis.


AMY GOODMAN: I also wanted to ask Margaret Parsons what this means for the US pulling out, the first African American president of the United States, Barack Obama, a conference on racism.


MARGARET PARSONS: Well, this is very disappointing. And many of the people of African descent here have expressed their disappointment in Barack Obama, that we feel that he has come in, and he has talked about change. And we have seen where he has extended a hand to Cuba after fifty years of the embargo, where he’s willing to make change. He has extended a hand to the Muslim and Arab world and trying to get people to take a different view or move back from their stereotypical positions on the Muslim and the Arab world. He’s shown in many ways—he’s gone to Turkey, and he’s willing and said that he’s willing to sit down and meet and talk with the president of Iran, with North Korea.


And so, we feel that at the very least he should have expressed and shown some goodwill and some good faith and, in his whole agenda on change, to come here, to actually read the document and not listen just to the pro-Israeli lobby, but to send a delegation and to show that he really is committed to change and he really is committed to an anti-racism agenda, and to do the right thing and to have participated. We are very surprised, we are very disappointed. And quite frankly, I think that this is a black eye on the Obama administration.


AMY GOODMAN: What can be accomplished at this conference with a number of countries, with Germany and Holland and Switzerland and Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Canada, also boycotting? What now do you hope can come at the end of this conference?


MARGARET PARSONS: I think it’s important to note that this unholy and cynical alliance between what is predominantly white Western countries is them not wanting to have to address the legacy of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, colonization, the occupation of Palestine, and the expropriation of indigenous people’s lands and resources.


And I think still a lot has been accomplished, because a lot has been achieved since 2001. Many regions of the world, many countries have taken the Durban Declaration and Program of Action very seriously and have moved it forward, countries such as Brazil. The Afro-Latino and indigenous communities in regions in South America have seen not full and complete progress, but significant progress. We’ve seen the same thing happen in places like South Africa, with the Dalits in India. And so, I think that we are here now to support those countries, to support those regions and those governments, and as they move forward in the implementation.


But also we are here in defiance of our governments—Canada and the US and New Zealand and the Netherlands—to say we are not giving up the fight, and we are going to continue in our struggle to end racism, in our anti-racism agenda, and to continue to hold our countries accountable and these Western countries accountable, because this is our very lives, this is our very human rights that’s at stake here. And whether or not they are here, we will continue to move and continue to speak out against atrocities around the world, human rights abuses, and to ensure that racism and discrimination is combatted everywhere.


AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you both for being with us, Margaret Parsons, executive director of the African Canadian Legal Clinic, as well as Ingrid Jaradat, the director of the Bethlehem-based BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian residency and refugee rights, both speaking to us from Geneva.



Democracy Now.com
It's Not The Things One Knows That Get One In Trouble , It's The Things Ones Knows That Just Isn't So , That Get One In Trouble !

Methuselah
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:39 pm

Israeli Military Finds No Fault in Gaza Attack

Post by Methuselah »

The Israeli military says it’s concluded an investigation absolving its forces of committing any crimes during the three-week assault on the Gaza Strip beginning late last year. Israeli military deputy chief of staff General Dan Harel said Israel’s lone mistakes came down to intelligence and operational errors.

General Dan Harel: “We found out that the IDF operated under the international law and according to a very high standard of professionalism and moral standards. Saying that, we found out several mistakes, intelligence and operational mistakes we made, and we are dealing with them.”

Israel killed more than 1,300 Palestinians during the Gaza attack, most of them women and children. It bombed crowded civilian areas, ambulances, aid compounds, UN facilities, mosques and several schools. Hamas spokesperson Ayman Taha dismissed the Israeli investigation as a sham.

Ayman Taha: “This is a mockery of all the crimes that have been committed against our people. And the reason that the Israeli army cannot consider what has happened in the Gaza Strip as criminal is because the criminal himself cannot also be the judge. Therefore, these findings of Israeli army innocence are unreliable. The crimes that have been committed are crystal clear.”

The Israeli probe comes ahead of a UN investigation headed by former international prosecutor Richard Goldstone. Bill Van Esveld of Human Rights Watch called the IDF move a preliminary reaction to the UN’s anticipated findings.

Bill Van Esveld: “This appears to be a whitewash investigation that is happening just before the Goldstone investigation mandated by the United Nations. And it seems to prove the point that Human Rights Watch has been making all along, which is that there needs to be an independent and impartial United Nations investigation into these allegations of laws of war violations, because the IDF has not lived up to the job.”
It's Not The Things One Knows That Get One In Trouble , It's The Things Ones Knows That Just Isn't So , That Get One In Trouble !

Methuselah
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:39 pm

Israel Demolishes Palestinian Home in East Jerusalem

Post by Methuselah »

other news from Israel and the Occupied Territories, Israel has defied US warnings and demolished another Palestinian home in East Jerusalem. The Obama administration’s few mild criticisms of Israel have centered around destroying homes on Palestinian land. The home belonged to the Hudidon family, which includes seven children.

Clinton Vows Continued US Boycott of Palestinians
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has renewed US vows to boycott the Palestinian government unless Hamas meets US-Israeli demands. Clinton testified Wednesday before the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “We will not deal with nor in any way fund a Palestinian government that includes Hamas, unless and until Hamas has renounced violence, recognized Israel, and agreed to follow the previous obligations of the Palestinian Authority. And that is our policy, and that is exactly what is guiding us, but we want to leave open the door that that can happen.”

The policy of opening the door to Hamas’s acceptance marks a slight rhetorical deviation from Bush administration policy, which unequivocally rejected any dealings with Hamas. But it continues the Bush policy of imposing conditions on Palestinians not imposed on Israel. Israel has long refused to renounce violence, recognize Palestine or agree to uphold prior agreements. In response to Clinton’s comments, Hamas spokesperson Osama Hamdan said, “Hillary Clinton must understand that there is a Palestinian democracy and there [were] Palestinian elections and someone won those elections.”

Meanwhile, Clinton was also asked about former Vice President Dick Cheney’s comments the Obama administration’s rollback of Bush torture policies is endangering the nation.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “Well, it won’t surprise you, I don’t consider him a particularly reliable source.”

This week, Cheney called for the release of documents that could prove what he called the “success” of the Bush administration’s torture methods in gaining new intelligence.



Democracy Now!.com
It's Not The Things One Knows That Get One In Trouble , It's The Things Ones Knows That Just Isn't So , That Get One In Trouble !

User avatar
Chewchy
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:35 pm
Location: Tomb of Cyrus the Great

Re: Israel Demolishes Palestinian Home in East Jerusalem

Post by Chewchy »

Methuselah wrote:other news from Israel and the Occupied Territories, Israel has defied US warnings and demolished another Palestinian home in East Jerusalem. The Obama administration’s few mild criticisms of Israel have centered around destroying homes on Palestinian land. The home belonged to the Hudidon family, which includes seven children.
Why did they demolish they home? Do you have a link or something where I can read the entirety of the story?

Methuselah
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:39 pm

Re: Israel Demolishes Palestinian Home in East Jerusalem

Post by Methuselah »

Chewchy wrote:
Methuselah wrote:other news from Israel and the Occupied Territories, Israel has defied US warnings and demolished another Palestinian home in East Jerusalem. The Obama administration’s few mild criticisms of Israel have centered around destroying homes on Palestinian land. The home belonged to the Hudidon family, which includes seven children.
Why did they demolish they home? Do you have a link or something where I can read the entirety of the story?


Go To Democracy Now.com
It's Not The Things One Knows That Get One In Trouble , It's The Things Ones Knows That Just Isn't So , That Get One In Trouble !

viduur
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:55 am

Re: More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conferen

Post by viduur »

Methuselah wrote:As the conference began, Israel said it was recalling its ambassador to Switzerland. The protest came as the Swiss president met the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is to address the UN conference later today.
It's really very atrocious.However it is exposing Israel's contempt only instead of proving Swiss Prez wrong.
Methuselah wrote:President Obama defended the boycott decision at a news conference in Trinidad on Sunday, citing concerns over adopting language from the 2001 final document and its expressions of, quote, “antagonism towards Israel.” He said participating in the conference, quote, “would have involved putting our imprimatur on something that we just don’t believe.”
It may have been better if Prez Obama would have opted to defend Israel at the Conference instead of boycotting it, when he was so confident of Israel's credentials. Decision of Boycot proves beyond any point that US is still playing like a pawn in the Zionist Game Plan.

User avatar
Ibn Rushd
Posts: 2126
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:46 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Re: More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conferen

Post by Ibn Rushd »

East/West Jerusalem=East/West Berlin?? :huh:
There is no Master but the Master, and QT-1 is his Prophet.

Asimov's robot story "Reason"

User avatar
Chewchy
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:35 pm
Location: Tomb of Cyrus the Great

Re: Israel Demolishes Palestinian Home in East Jerusalem

Post by Chewchy »

Methuselah wrote:
Chewchy wrote:
Methuselah wrote:other news from Israel and the Occupied Territories, Israel has defied US warnings and demolished another Palestinian home in East Jerusalem. The Obama administration’s few mild criticisms of Israel have centered around destroying homes on Palestinian land. The home belonged to the Hudidon family, which includes seven children.
Why did they demolish they home? Do you have a link or something where I can read the entirety of the story?


Go To Democracy Now.com
Then what? Can you link to the specific story?

Edited: I did a google search and found a few accounts of this particular story and then looked into the issue at hand which comes down to the obtaining of building permits. According to the articles I read, this gentleman did not have the proper building permits and the house was demolished. There is no mention of what the process was... just the A-Z of it; i.e. no valid permit, house destroyed. What is the rest of the story? Was he given opportunity to make it right? did he get warning after warning and the only way that they can respond to a dangerous housing situation is to raze it? Did he sit back and just say Inshallah?

In another article I read, there seems to be a big problem in the government actually approving of many permit requests and one said that 94% of the building permits requested by Palestinians were denied - why? Lots of questions on this one.

User avatar
Ariel
Posts: 7748
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conf

Post by Ariel »

:cry:

Image
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.

Nosuperstition
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:45 am

Re: More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conf

Post by Nosuperstition »

Ariel wrote::cry:

Image
None exactly has seen Jesus in his original color.Skin color of Jesus seems to have been window dressed to appeal to his prospective followers.Back then , there were no Askhenazi Jews in Israel.Only Shephardic ones existed.Ashkenazi Jews are European and Central Asian converts to Judaism.
palli or halli in Dravidian languages means a village just like gaav in Aryan languages means a village.palli or halli in Aryan Mauryan Imperial era around 200 B.C designates a tribal hamlet.So many of those in South India are indeed descendants of tribals and are still keeping up that heritage.

User avatar
Takeiteasynow
Posts: 785
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 8:24 pm

Re: More Countries Join US, Israel Boycott of UN Racism Conf

Post by Takeiteasynow »

Nosuperstition wrote:
Ariel wrote::cry:

Image
None exactly has seen Jesus in his original color.Skin color of Jesus seems to have been window dressed to appeal to his prospective followers.Back then , there were no Askhenazi Jews in Israel.Only Shephardic ones existed.Ashkenazi Jews are European and Central Asian converts to Judaism.
No worries, any skin color is possible. At the time of Jesus' birth Greeks had colonized and conquered the Near East importing troops from the Caucasus while Yemenis migrated to Syria. So reddish or brown - it's all possible.
Abraham= H'ammu'rab(b)i, Historical Muhammad=Benjamin of Tiberias. Islam: Syncretic Israelite Yahwishm Deity: nameless, epithets Dsr, El Qutbay, ʼAlâhâ, Allāh. Ka'ba: Kutha => Samaria => Petra=> Makkah. Hijrah 622: Petra => Kerak

Post Reply