Page 9 of 10

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:02 am
by tejpat
LCD wrote:Actually, you never claimed it was about Apostates. You claimed it was a command to kill Athiests.

So, until you stop changing the subject you haven't really shown me what your claim was.

Thanks for Playing Tejpat, you showed me how little you actually read and actually understand what you don't read at all.

There are lots of places for illiterates like yourself. I suggest you learn to read, because it takes that ability to actually stay on this board,

Thanks for failing.


please remind me, in case i forget, not to debate with you ever again because its less painful to bang my head :bashwall: on the wall.
thankz for showing me that followers of abrahmic religions are at best in denial.
anyways, cheers, have a great life ahead and remember, there was neither May 21 nor Oct 21 and certainly no Dec 21, in short no rapture.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:19 pm
by LCD
tejpat wrote:
please remind me, in case i forget, not to debate with you ever again because its less painful to bang my head :bashwall: on the wall.
thankz for showing me that followers of abrahmic religions are at best in denial.
anyways, cheers, have a great life ahead and remember, there was neither May 21 nor Oct 21 and certainly no Dec 21, in short no rapture.



Aaaaand, Once again, you have equated me, just like before with the person who made that prophecy, a priest who i don't believe in, who made up his own statement about the bible and the rapture.


Just like before I asked you, what do they have to do with me? What? And like before you ignored me and just kept asserting that I am one of their sect. So, I show you again, that you really dont respect me, since you mock me for a sect that isn't my sect, or a belief that has no scriptural backing. You are the disrespectful A$$ of this board, and you SAID that I am openly commanded to KILL athiests. I asked you for an example and a quote, saying such. You couldnt provide it. You lose.

Here is the definition of an Athiest:

a·the·ist audio (th-st) KEY

NOUN:

One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.


By that statement alone it invalidates your so called theory. An athiest can't believe in ANY god whatsoever.

You need to retract your BS now, because all you've done so far insult.

Thanks for failing.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:19 am
by Yohan
tejpat wrote:Like how many times i have to ask you to give any verses from veda that justifies Caste system. at least have some shame and learn from Ali sina who backs every claim from Quran and authentic sources. till now you have miserably failed to show even one verse.

How many times do I have to tell you that I don't intent to give any quotes from Veda about caste. There are many sources you can get such quotes from. Further this is not an educational forum. You need to have some basics to debate here.

It is interesting you bring up Alin Sina here. Have you read his article on the front page of this FFI site 'proving' that Obama was not born in USA, even after the State of Hawaii made public his birth certificate. So learn something from that when you keep asking for proof.
i acknowledge and accept this caste system was in India before christians came and i also acknowledge that this is not from scripture but it was due to weak points from it which couldn't stop this. but this thing was intensify by missionaries because they wanted some converts, they wanted to grow their jesus business so they totally exploited this issue. christians and missionaries don't come here to uplift the Indian society but they are here to convert as many as possible. their sole interest is to convert by hook or crook.and on top of that, those fake faith healers and evangelists are duping thousands.

Nonsense! Are you trying to say that the Hindu caste manual Manusmrithi (2000 years old) was written by Christian missionaries? :roflmao:
Now, many hindu spiritual gurus are educating many people that there no rigid caste system. they are going to banish this. unlike christians who constantly try to use this point for more conversions.
there were people who rejected this system ( if you have any knowledge besides bashing points ) and strongly opposed in the past.
and FYI, even christians were the same in past, killing other denomination's people because they didn't accept their version of christianity.
mass witch burning, even persecution of homosexuals is happening in this time, in christian country uganda, there is a law which orders to kill homosexuals.
pope is urging to denounce condoms so that hundreds of Africans have been infected with HIV and now they are going to die just because pope has said so.

Stop being a Neo-Hindu! That is the problem preventing you from seeing Hinduism in its true form. It will also stop you from blaming other people for Hinduism's problems.

So many scientific articles are published every year on topics such as Dravidians, Aryans, Caste system and so on about Indian people (one is given below). Here you know nothing about them, and it is so pathetic!
http://www.ias.ac.in/jgenet/Vol87No2/temp/jgen00117.pdf

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:13 pm
by tejpat
Yohan wrote:
tejpat wrote:Like how many times i have to ask you to give any verses from veda that justifies Caste system. at least have some shame and learn from Ali sina who backs every claim from Quran and authentic sources. till now you have miserably failed to show even one verse.

How many times do I have to tell you that I don't intent to give any quotes from Veda about caste. There are many sources you can get such quotes from. Further this is not an educational forum. You need to have some basics to debate here.

It is interesting you bring up Alin Sina here. Have you read his article on the front page of this FFI site 'proving' that Obama was not born in USA, even after the State of Hawaii made public his birth certificate. So learn something from that when you keep asking for proof.

Firstly, you say one needs to have some basics and than you contradict yourself.
secondly, i was giving example of Ali sina for research on Quran, i guess that what is this site for. ( not for exposing USA President )
lastly, by your logic, there are many sources which say bible is full of Bullsh!t , jesus was a egyptian king who wanted to rule over people again, YHWH is an ancient pagan deity, chruch is actually circe which was ancient goddess.
Yohan wrote:
tejpat wrote:i acknowledge and accept this caste system was in India before christians came and i also acknowledge that this is not from scripture but it was due to weak points from it which couldn't stop this. but this thing was intensify by missionaries because they wanted some converts, they wanted to grow their jesus business so they totally exploited this issue. christians and missionaries don't come here to uplift the Indian society but they are here to convert as many as possible. their sole interest is to convert by hook or crook.and on top of that, those fake faith healers and evangelists are duping thousands.

Nonsense! Are you trying to say that the Hindu caste manual Manusmrithi (2000 years old) was written by Christian missionaries? :roflmao:

roll and laugh your ass off, thats only thing you can do best. and where did i write some christian missionary wrote any texts. the only text they wrote was enough to put people's happiness to end.

Yohan wrote:
tejpat wrote:Now, many hindu spiritual gurus are educating many people that there no rigid caste system. they are going to banish this. unlike christians who constantly try to use this point for more conversions.
there were people who rejected this system ( if you have any knowledge besides bashing points ) and strongly opposed in the past.
and FYI, even christians were the same in past, killing other denomination's people because they didn't accept their version of christianity.
mass witch burning, even persecution of homosexuals is happening in this time, in christian country uganda, there is a law which orders to kill homosexuals.
pope is urging to denounce condoms so that hundreds of Africans have been infected with HIV and now they are going to die just because pope has said so.

Stop being a Neo-Hindu! That is the problem preventing you from seeing Hinduism in its true form. It will also stop you from blaming other people for Hinduism's problems.

So many scientific articles are published every year on topics such as Dravidians, Aryans, Caste system and so on about Indian people (one is given below). Here you know nothing about them, and it is so pathetic!
http://www.ias.ac.in/jgenet/Vol87No2/temp/jgen00117.pdf

i said they are many many weak points that are being exploited by us firstly, that mean i blamed me and scripture first, than i accused christian missionaries for exploiting for conversion.
no need to point out what problems we have, we know, BUT do you know your problems are ??
i can show you about a dozen sites which will say Jesus was a egyptian king , a conman, illuminati, lucifer, devil and church is actually a circus which tends ti control people.
you go on youtube and write jesus is devil ( or fraud, lie, be creative ) and you'll see many videos showing the truth - as per your sayings.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:57 pm
by LCD
So, Funny how you haven't responded back to me, since you really didn't show an open command to kill athiests.

Golly, i guess its cut and run as usual, eh Tejpat?

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:57 pm
by tejpat
LCD wrote:So, Funny how you haven't responded back to me, since you really didn't show an open command to kill athiests.

Golly, i guess its cut and run as usual, eh Tejpat?


I made my stand clear on debating with you. please see my previous post on it.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:12 am
by LCD
I saw your post claerly. You showed no verse saying to kill athiests. Now, you can claim to be a postmodernist, or a deconstructionist when it comes to the bible, but i'm sorry, you can';t make the word athiest appear where there is no example of it. So, i say again, either be honest about what the verse says,and quit being a liar.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:01 am
by LCD
So essentially Dawkins is playing favorites.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 1:38 pm
by Nosuperstition
LCD wrote:So, Funny how you haven't responded back to me, since you really didn't show an open command to kill athiests.

Golly, i guess its cut and run as usual, eh Tejpat?


No open command to kill atheists but atheists such as myself are deserving of death nonetheless as per the Bible.

The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.Psalm 14:1


When someone does abominable deeds , he becomes a sinner.Note that its not just atheists but polytheists who do don't believe in God(God=one most powerful true creator god as different from 'gods') are branded totally virtueless or devoid of good.

For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.Romans 6:23


That death is a bit ambiguous ,it can mean death meted out by God,it can mean death that comes naturally for all human beings or it can also mean death that can be meted out to sinners by fellow human beings who judge them as sinners.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:07 am
by Nosuperstition
LCD wrote:
Sten wrote:
Wootah wrote:The only benefit of Hinduism and Buddhism for Mr Dawkins is that they aren't Christian.


Not at all. Hinduism and Buddism don't teach that unbelievers will be tortured for eternity, for example.


Yes. but they also don't necessarily teach that good action is the way, they suggest it, but infact with multiple reincarnation attempts for each one simply gets infinite chances to get it right, and Christianity says you get one, so Christians are supposed to act good.

Where in Christianity does it say kill the unbelievers, where in the bible, does it say this, oh wait, it doesn't.

That's the koran. ooopsie.

Funny how Dawkins if he really knew islam would rail against it, but Dawkins like the coward he in can only ever attack Christianity and ignore Judiasm.


Those who believe that grace alone is sufficient for salvation are not likely to act that good.And those that think too much/think always about each and every aspect of their life in terms of confirmity with their personal God's whims,fancies and approvals are more likely to be driven crazy and out of sync with common sense.

One life concept does not offer the middle path.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:57 pm
by Nosuperstition
LCD wrote:So essentially Dawkins is playing favorites.


Dawkins might be playing favourites,but athiests come in all hues.One such avowed atheist Radagast/righteous of the Old forum firmly vouched for or endorsed the superiority of monothiest religions such as Christianity and Islam over polytheist religions Hinduism and Buddhism in the below mentioned thread.

http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7347

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:48 pm
by Nosuperstition
LCD wrote:At the time another god would be the Sumerian, Egyptian and Babylonian Gods, that Demand Human Sacrifice

LORD God did not explicitly request the hangings. But LORD God imposed an insufferable famine on the Israelites, LORD God named the Gibeonites as the people to be appeased, and the Gibeonites named the penalty. When it was done, LORD God apparently found the human sacrifice to be satisfactory: the chapter continues with accounts of battles, and the famine is not mentioned further. This sequence — an angry god causes a natural disaster, innocent life is slain to appease the god's anger, and the hardship ceases — this is the same sequence of events found in the human sacrifice rites of other primitive religions.


http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html

God of Israel just like all other tribal gods needed animal and human sacrifices.Human sacrifice stopped among Israelites due to the Zoroastrian influence.

People over time realise that sacrifices are of no use.Romans banned human sacrifice of Celts and spoke lowly of them even when they were pagan,they claimed high moral ground over the Phoenicians citing human sacrifice practices of the Phoenician chiefs during wars even when they were pagan.

The only holy book that possibly does not contain references of human sacrifices offered to God/gods is the Quran but then Muslims offer a great number of animal sacrifices on Eid symbolically stating that they are ready to get sacrificed if Allah so demands.

Also Buddha specifically abhorred even animal sacrifices therefore the only other religion that might be against human sacrifices might be Buddhism.However Tantric Buddhism which is akin to voodoo is said to involve animal as well as human sacrifices.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:26 am
by Nosuperstition
Non-violence,truth,non-stealing,celibacy and non-anger etc are particularly the characteristics of a Satvika person


http://books.google.co.in/books?id=4jnb ... &q&f=false

In Brahmanical Hindu temples the devotees without any prior knowledge offer coconuts to the deity which is in reality is what is theologically called Satvika bali , a non-violent sacrifice.There also exist Bali peetams in temples which means sacrificial altars.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:22 am
by Nosuperstition
Yohan wrote:
bobs1244 wrote:
Yohan wrote:You are right on Buddhism, but are plainly wrong regarding Hinduism.
Says who? The man that believes that believes in such half-baked myths as the Aryan Invasion nonsense? You are incapable of objective thinking thanks to your poisoned mindset.

Says me!! A Hindu who do not believe in the history of Aryan Invasion is no Hindu!

As I had stated earlier, though many religions had created a mythical world of Hell for religious purposes, no religion but Hinduism had succeeded in creating a real hell on this earth, for those who do not obey the laws and rules of Hinduism. Ask any Dalit! He will tell you you the Hindu hell he lives in, for the crimes he had committed in his past life. Such is the world of Hinduism!!


The Purusha sukta hymn of the Rig Veda where it is said that the gods created the four varnas is said to authenticate the four fold Hindu caste system.

Rich and poor have this in common: The LORD is the Maker of them all.


http://bible.cc/proverbs/22-2.htm

Similarly the above verse authenticates or validates the 2 fold class system in Christianity as it is God who created them.

In cities, workers rose against the wealthy merchants who had been running city hall. Peasants and workers revolted in Spain, the Netherlands, southern Germany, Italy, and England.

In England, some asked why there was bondage when all were from one father and mother -- Adam and Eve. Rebellion was mixed with religious fervor and a call for holding everything in common and for the abolition of differences between lord and serf. But in most of England were castles with soldiers enough to control local peasants, and the peasantry did not transform their questions into immediate and successful revolution
.


http://www.fsmitha.com/h3/h14eu1.htm

Now if expression of resentment by revolts etc is living in hell according to you,surely even Christianity at times created hells on earth not just Hinduism.

In Islam if your wife agrees to and if you can provide for the providence of your extra wife/wives, you can marry upto 4 wives.Categorically Islam agrees that there can exist differences in the levels of providence so even Islam is not egalitarian.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:57 pm
by Nosuperstition
Yohan wrote: Well every Hindu practicing the caste system even today is totally a different matter!!


If you say Hindus are practicing caste system by birth and profession,you are seriously mistaken.In many Urban and semi-urban areas people are free to choose their means of livelihood and no Hindu gives a darn about it.

Even some Dalits of rural areas own lands albeit to a lesser extent and till them and do not perform tasks such as scavenging etc traditionally designated to them.

The only exception is that a priest who performs religious rituals must be a Brahmin by birth.That is because ritual purity laws of Hinduism lay emphasis on vegetarianism and it is only observant Brahmins who remain vegetarian right from birth and well versed in religious chants.And yes there is scriptural basis for that.

"Yudhishthira said, 'O foremost of serpents, he, it is asserted by the wise, in whom are seen truth, charity, forgiveness, good conduct, benevolence, observance of the rites of his order and mercy is a Brahmana.

And a Sudra is not a Sudra by birth alone--nor a Brahmana is Brahmana by birth alone. He, it is said by the wise, in whom are seen those virtues is a Brahmana. And people term him a Sudra in whom those qualities do not exist, even though he be a Brahmana by birth.


http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03179.htm

Put simply birth is also a factor in deciding who a Brahmana is though it is not the sole factor.The other factor is his conduct.

Non-vegetarian diet along with liquour is said to influence the conduct of an individual and since Brahmins abstain from them they are considered ritually pure and credited with good conduct.For more details one should google about Satvika,Rajasika and Tamasika types of foods and their influences on human behaviour.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:48 am
by Nosuperstition
Yohan wrote:
tejpat wrote:
Yohan wrote:Now, answer me on my question of how old are the Vedas, Rig Veda I meant.
this is what Hindus believe - written in scriptures :
Vedas were in existence since satyuga and were memorized and passed on.
at end of Dwaparyuga and beginning of Kalyuga, Veda Vyasa compiled Vedas. Kaliyuga began in 3102 BC
Yuga - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuga
Kaliyuga - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kali_Yuga
Vedas - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedas

Your own given sources say that Rig Veda was composed only by 1000 BC. There were no Indo Aryans in the subcontinent in 3102BC. There were no Indo-aryan laguage like Sanskrit either in the subcontinent, the language of Vedas. Subcontinentals picked up Indo Aryan tongue from the Aryan Invaders who came into India 1500-1000BC. There are so many scientific proofs for it. A simple one is that subcontinentals (north Indians) are the only indo-aryan speaking people in the world who speak Indo-Aryan language with a Dravidian accent (special retroflex accent, a chief characteristic of the Draviadian language). For example, Just watch Aryan Afghan President Karzai speaking English in TV, and an equally educated north Indian speaking English. That is the difference I am talking about. Much scientific studies had been done on it. That shows all subcontinentals spoke Dravidian language before the arrival of Aryans.

Rig Veda speaks about all the four castes by name, several times. It speaks of the Aryan enslavement of Indians (dasas, dasyus). Manusmrithi written some 2000 years ago speaks how Dasas became Shutra caste.

Stop reading books written by Hindu fanatics, their minions and other idiots. Read decent books. Learn some basics first. Don't be ignorant like a Hindu fanatic. Stop glorifying Sanskrit, the language of your invaders.


The caste system of Hinduism is called Varna Vyavastha or system of colors based classes ,Varna shrama dharma or righteous color basis system and Varna sankaram or mixing of colour based classes is discouraged by monarchs such as Gautami Putra Satakarni.

The gunas or qualities have colors. Black is tamas, red is rajas, and white is sattva.


http://worldyogavalley.com/index.php?id=2

The Brahmin or intellectual/priestly role is associated with white signifying Satwik guna for ritual purity; Kshatryia is associated with red (sanguine) symbolizing strength/vigor and courage, the Rajasic-Satwic gunas; yellow is associated with the cultivator and merchant role representing Tamasic-Rajasic gunas, (gold is yellow); and the physical, service provider role, Tamasic guna, is associated with black, signifying natural abilities, and noting that feet rest on the earth, with its natural resources. The color association in the Guyana and Trinidad & Tobago flags, indicate a similar symbolism, that has nothing to do with race:


http://www.guyanajournal.com/gibson_rebuttal_2.html

But

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu10.htm
it is difficult to ascertain one's caste, because of promiscuous intercourse among the four orders. This is my opinion. Men belonging to all orders (promiscuously) beget offspring upon women of all the orders. And of men, speech, sexual intercourse, birth and death are common.


http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03179.htm

So even if Hinduism started on a white Aryan racial basis,it is no more racist as the boundaries of race have long disappeared amongst Hindus.
Yohan wrote: For some 3000 years, Hindus have had a caste system they claimed was derived from the holy Vedas, and they were darn proud of it. They claimed it was further sanctified by holy texts like Gita and Manusmrithi and so on, too. Hindus deligently followed their caste and fully justified their caste descrimination using such theological basis.

Nowhere could Hindus find that one's caste was even based upon one birth (though it was all over there too)!


From the tribe of Levi, Aaron and his descendents were singled out to be the priests and serve in the Temple

[url]
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jso ... ibes1.html[/url]

Monopolisation of privileged positions is something not limited to Hinduism.Strictly speaking nowadays and even in history nobody strictly follows birth based occupations.For example the dominant castes of Andhra Pradesh are Kamma,Kapu,Velama and Reddy collectively categorised Sacchudra or good Shudra castes or good conduct exhibiting castes according to my 8th class Telugu non-detailed text about Rudramadevi.

Sacchudra=sat+shudra or good shudras similiar to words such as sadvartanam,sadacharam,saduddhesyam meaning good behaviour,good tradition and good intent.

According to Manusmriti servility is innate in Shudras.

All these castes live by agriculture which is not the occupation of the Shudras but Vaishyas.Historically Reddys even established Reddy kingdom that lasted for a brief period which is the dominion of the Kshatriyas.So Shudras have disregarded the innate servility principle of Manusmriti even back theN.According to Manusmriti , Shudras are not supposed to accumulate wealth as such Sudras cause pain to Brahmins,but these caste people are way wealthier than Brahmins.

Nowadays Brahmins are also into trade which is the occupation of Vaishyas,the lower caste of milkmen have accumulated considerable wealth,people of all castes vie for jobs in the executive positions even though they can be religiously categorised as Shudra or servile in nature.
Yohan wrote:Hindus were actually duped by their own religion for some 3000 years! Well every Hindu practicing the caste system even today is totally a different matter!!

Now, all this new revelations (actually bogus revelations) about Hinduism came about simply because Christian missionaries badmouthed Hinduism. Why do Hindus succumb to such Christian missionary tricks so easily? I just don't get it! Where is the Hindu pride, Hindus?

Hindus, take a lesson from Muslims! They all continue to believe that prophet Mohammed had sex with a child, except for ashamed Muslims like 'iffo', so such neo-Muslims could still be a Muslim and be sane at the same time. Is that the moral here, for Hindus like you?


viewtopic.php?f=71&t=13620&p=190380&hilit=adultery#p190380

Chritians in practice do not follow the injuction laid down by none other than Christ himself to pluck out eyes and cut off hands if those parts cause the person to sin,yet they call themselves Christian.

So I do not see anything wrong in Hindus doing the same by disowning the Manusmriti partly or wholly and yet calling themselves Hindus.

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:29 am
by Garudaman
an atheist (who do not believe in God) said nothing wrong in Hinduism (who believe in God), because Hindu Religion offer much more sophisticated worldviews/philosophies (which was unthinkable an atheist)? :lotpot:

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:35 am
by Nosuperstition
Yohan wrote:Nowhere could Hindus find that one's caste was even based upon one birth (though it was all over there too)!


The earliest Hindu writings, the Rig Veda show that Caste was not considered hereditary.

“I am a bard, my father is a physician, my mother’s job is to grind the corn……” (RV 9.112.3)


http://western-hindu.org/2008/01/27/the-caste-system/

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:01 pm
by Nosuperstition

2 Tim. 3:16-17 says, "All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work."


http://forum09.faithfreedom.org//viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3895&p=70893&hilit=scripture+reproof+correction#p70893

Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'"


http://bible.cc/matthew/4-4.htm

Yohan wrote:First accept that Hinduism is a religion of the book, and Hindus are a people of the book, like Abrahmic religions. Then, ask for proof from the Hindu holy books. Get it yet? I bet you still don't!


/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=9384&p=150789&hilit=People+of+Book#p150789

I remember quite well of what you said previously about Hinduism being not a religion of book but a religion of traditions passed down from generation to generation.

Now you are viewing Hinduism through the Abrahamic lens. :sleeping:

Re: Atheists - nothing wrong in Hinduism & Bhuddhism

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:09 pm
by Nosuperstition
Sprituality of pagans did not stand a chance when their opponents had book on their side.Their oral traditions was no match.


viewtopic.php?f=71&t=1803&p=28648&hilit=oral+traditions#p28648

oral traditions supposedly are no match for books as per cc or idesigner.