In a deranged way the European Court of Human Rights' ruling in the afforementioned legal case was a recognition that non-Muslim Europeans, if they are made aware of the more unedifying details of Muhammad's conduct and pronouncements, are bound to develop a negative view of Islam's prophet and of the religion he founded. Furthermore, the ECHR understands that negativity towards Islam will inevitably translate into negativity towards its followers. This is the "incitement" they refer to. After all, those of us who hate the racist ideology of the Ku Klux Klan tend also to hate klansmen. Even if those Klansmen have not personally been involved in racist violence they are rightly regarded, by virtue of their willing membership of the Klan, as being complicit in that violence.In 2018, The European Court of Human Rights ruled that criticism of the Prophet Muhammed constitutes incitement to hatred and therefore is not protected free speech...
The case involved Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, an Austrian woman who in 2011 was convicted of “denigrating religious beliefs” after giving a series of lectures presenting the historical truth of the pedophile practices of the founder of Islam with his third wife, Aisha; most hadiths (collections of traditions containing the words and actions of Muhammed) confirm that Aisha was a prepubescent girl of nine years of age when Muhammed, age fifty-six, consumed his marriage with her.
However, so morally confused have Europe's "progressive" legalists and politicos become that they regard justifiable abhorrence of Islam as itself something abhorrent.
This reason for this is clear: Muslims are overwhelmingly non-white and therefore, in the progressive world view, victims by definition. This view of Muslims as victims, rather than willing perpetuators of a bigoted, intolerant and violent ideology which dehumanizes and incites violence against those of us who choose not to accept its precepts, renders progressives incapable of clearly seeing Islamic atrocity-perpetration for what it is. This is starkly illustrated in the case of Shamima Begum, a "British" Muslim woman who chose to travel to Syria to aid and abet an armed gang of mass murderers and rapists whose goal she knew was to extend its rampage of murder and rape over the whole earth. However, to UK progressives she HAD to be, by virtue of her brown skin and hijab, a victim - in her case of "online grooming". "The poor thing..bring her peace. Bring her joy. She is young. She is only a girl. Bring her home!" they demandingly sing.