Discuss world politics in relation to Islam and Muslims.
by ygalg » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:57 am
Muslim Brotherhood hijacked revolution, US endorses Islamists, Egypt's liberal parties say Roi Kais
The US government was pressing Egypt's military leadership to transfer power to the Muslim Brotherhood, which "hijacked the revolution," the country's liberal parties charged Saturday. Earlier Saturday, the Supreme Presidential Electoral Commission announced that the winner of the run-off election would be announced on Sunday after debate on candidates' appeals had concluded. One official on the commission has leaked that the Muslim Brotherhood's candidate, Mohammad Morsi, had raked in a majority of the votes, but over the past week secular candidate Ahmed Shafiq also claimed victory.
General Abed al-Munim Kato, an advisor to the military council's public relations department, has vilified both the US and the Muslim Brotherhood in light of recent events. In an interview to the al-Masry al-Youm newspaper, Kato stressed that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's criticism of the military rule and her calls for regime change served as confirmation of contact between the US and senior Muslim Brotherhood officials. "It is unacceptable that Egypt face outside pressure that forces Morsi on us as president," he said.
"Will Morsi be elected president because he spent a lot of time in the US or because his children have US citizenship?" the general wondered, adding that "The Muslim Brotherhood movement has shown itself." Meanwhile, sources close to both sides told the al-Ahram newspaper that the military government and the Muslim Brotherhood were holding intensive, "high-level" talks that could lead to a political deal. In the end, they claimed, Morsi would be declared president. On Friday, as tens of thousands demonstrated in Cairo's Tahrir Square in support of the Muslim Brotherhood and against the army's latest move, Morsi himself called to announce the election results without further delay. Speaking at a press conference, Morsi tried to play down the tension with the army and said that he had no problem with the ruling military council, calling it "patriotic." http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-4246186,00.html
“the problem with Islamophobia is that it gets in the way of jihad.” Robert Spencer
-

ygalg
-
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:51 am
- Location: israel
- Gender:

-
by CuteCoot » Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:17 am
The US should just stay right out of the ME. Whatever bad thing happens it will be their fault. They should stop commenting and they should stop paying them money to keep quiet because they won't keep quiet anyway.
-

CuteCoot
-
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:09 am
- Gender:

by ygalg » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:39 pm
CuteCoot wrote:The US should just stay right out of the ME. Whatever bad thing happens it will be their fault. They should stop commenting and they should stop paying them money to keep quiet because they won't keep quiet anyway.
I wonder what gain from this porridge, US believes to achieve (?)
“the problem with Islamophobia is that it gets in the way of jihad.” Robert Spencer
-

ygalg
-
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:51 am
- Location: israel
- Gender:

-
by pr126 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:53 pm
"Brother, you can believe in stones, as long as you don’t throw them at me." - Wafa Sultan
-

pr126
-
- Posts: 3165
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:24 am
- Location: Blighty
- Gender:

by Yohan » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:10 pm
US doesn't have much of a choice. I am sure Muslim brotherhood would bring intolerance and suffering for all. If democracy continues in Egypt (with a secular military staying in background), Muslim brotherhood would most likely lose the next national election. That's the best hope US can have.
Most Egyptians are very backward when it comes to thinking secular, like in all other Muslim countries. Actually what happens in Egypt will be repeated in those Muslim countries too, if they go democratic. As long as the country does not go the Iranian way, the path can be corrected.
-
Yohan
-
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:27 pm
- Gender:

by ringmaster » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:06 pm
Yohan wrote:US doesn't have much of a choice. I am sure Muslim brotherhood would bring intolerance and suffering for all. If democracy continues in Egypt (with a secular military staying in background), Muslim brotherhood would most likely lose the next national election. That's the best hope US can have.
Most Egyptians are very backward when it comes to thinking secular, like in all other Muslim countries. Actually what happens in Egypt will be repeated in those Muslim countries too, if they go democratic. As long as the country does not go the Iranian way, the path can be corrected.
The historical examples of muslim societies "correcting their path" are so few as to be inconsequential. As for the US supporting the muslim brotherhood, what else should we expect a muslim head of state in the Oval Office to do?
Last edited by ringmaster on Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The prophet of Islam was nothing more than a common criminal.
Please tell me if this is accurate:
“I have fabricated things against God and have imputed to Him words which He has not spoken.” ~MUHAMMAD (Al-Tabari 6:111)
-
ringmaster
-
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:36 pm
- Gender:

by Idesigner » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:02 pm
In any muslim majority country, from view point of non muslim minorities Muslim military dictator or a monarch is lot better than rule by muslim majority i.e. mobocracy.
-
Idesigner
-
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:51 pm
- Gender:

Return to World Politics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
|