Faith Freedom International

We oppose Islam, not Muslims. We are against hate, not faith

Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Miscellaneous ‹ Food for Thought
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Despicable right of conquest.

Here you can discuss anything that you may find thought provoking, which does not fit in any other category.
Post a reply
25 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
  • Reply with quote

Re: Despicable right of conquest.

Postby Nosuperstition » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:20 pm

Fernando wrote:
Nosuperstition wrote:In the film casualities of war,the character potrayed by Sean Penn asks the character potrayed by Michael J.Fox if he is a gxx for not partaking in the rape of the Vietnamese peasant girl.May be Muhammad too would have been insulted with that title if he did not take right hand possessions.
He doesn't seem to have been worried about the possibility of people calling him a dirty old man for having sex with a 9 year old child when he was in his 50's.


May be that was an accepted practice in the pagan Arab society from which Mohammed started his innings.For that matter even the Jewish Talmund talks about the right of the Rabbi to marry a 3 year old and the later Hindu Manusmriti verses mention about the acceptablility of a 6 year old bride for a 25 year old bridegroom.
Llinguistically Dravidian states of India watered by non-perennial rivers and with far greater chances of famine are taxed 2 to 3 times more than other states.Yet B.J.P leaders maintain that they treat all states equally.Elections with E.V.Ms=>ample scope for tampering,so ballot papers are a must
Nosuperstition
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:45 am
Gender: None specified
Top

  • Reply with quote

Re: Despicable right of conquest.

Postby manfred » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:38 pm

Nosuperstition wrote:For that matter even the Jewish Talmund talks about the right of the Rabbi to marry a 3 year old and the later Hindu Manusmriti verses mention about the acceptablility of a 6 year old bride for a 25 year old bridegroom.


It's called "Talmud" and your statement is one commonly found on Muslim or fascist websites, and is totally misleading.

In the example that you cite, that a Jew may marry a 3-year-old girl, it simply means that under the age of 3, a "marriage" contract has no validity. Beyond that, any "marriage arrangement" made at above the age of 3 must be accepted and validated by the girl herself at such time that she attains maturity. The Talmud is discussing a technical legal point, not condoning abhorrent sexual activities.


http://www.aish.com/atr/Misquoting_the_Talmud.html

For a detailed refutation with sources see here:

http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html
Jesus: "Ask and you will receive." Mohammed: "Take and give me 20%"
User avatar
manfred
 
Posts: 9378
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:29 pm
Gender: Male
Top

  • Reply with quote

Re: Despicable right of conquest.

Postby Fernando » Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:31 pm

Nosuperstition wrote:May be that was an accepted practice in the pagan Arab society from which Mohammed started his innings.
It probably was and maybe even nobody was particularly disgusted. But as Allah's representative on Earth and prime exmple to all men forever, surely Allah should have told him that people in the future would be disgusted and so, as that exemplar, his should desist from raping a child.
'It's a choice between the MONSTERS and the MANIACS'
Dr Julian Lewis M.P. (Chair, UK Defense Committee) on the conflict in Syria
User avatar
Fernando
 
Posts: 4238
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:27 pm
Gender: None specified
Top

  • Reply with quote

Re: Despicable right of conquest.

Postby Nosuperstition » Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:55 pm

But as Allah's representative on Earth and prime exmple to all men forever, surely Allah should have told him that people in the future would be disgusted and so, as that exemplar, his should desist from raping a child.


Now that today's West is the master of all warfare with long lasting lives,everyone agrees with its norms.Now suppose if the West faces the same situation which Hindus faced with muslims being Mighty, might be they too will follow the suit of marrying off people early so that they enjoy early and die off early while continuing the race by having children in the mean time just as might have had happened in case of later Manusmriti laws.Now once petrol is finished,human beings afterall might not live for long as most of the English medicines are made from petro-chemicals.
Llinguistically Dravidian states of India watered by non-perennial rivers and with far greater chances of famine are taxed 2 to 3 times more than other states.Yet B.J.P leaders maintain that they treat all states equally.Elections with E.V.Ms=>ample scope for tampering,so ballot papers are a must
Nosuperstition
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:45 am
Gender: None specified
Top

  • Reply with quote

Re: Despicable right of conquest.

Postby Fernando » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:45 pm

Nosuperstition wrote:Now once petrol is finished,human beings afterall might not live for long as most of the English medicines are made from petro-chemicals.
The amount of oil used to make medicines is a drop in the ocean. However, vast amounts of oil are used to make all manner of other things, including plastics. It's a criminal waste to burn it and we should go for renewable energy even if burning it didn't cause global warming and even if burning it didn't put us at the mercy of the Middle East and Russia.
'It's a choice between the MONSTERS and the MANIACS'
Dr Julian Lewis M.P. (Chair, UK Defense Committee) on the conflict in Syria
User avatar
Fernando
 
Posts: 4238
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:27 pm
Gender: None specified
Top

Previous

Post a reply
25 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Food for Thought

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group