A senior B.J.P spokesperson recently called his rival political opponent as being worse than a prostitute as she sells her party tickets to anyone who gives more money amongst existing prospective ticket seekers.If someone gives Rs 100/-,she sells the ticket to him,if someone offers Rs 200/-,she snatches away that ticket from the previous candidate and sells it to the new one who offered that Rs 200/- and so on and so forth he alleged.
According to British,the Indians instead of being grateful towards them for their more or less democratic rule which gave them a time of peace as compared to the previous eras of open warfare across the sub-continent, sought independence which would necessarily benefit them much more. Now independent India established industries of its own across the country,yet in Telangana,the semi-slave status of ‘nee baanchan kalmoktha dora’(I am your slave,I bow down to your feet my lord) did not go away until N.T.Rama Rao came to power. Now recently people wanted even more in Telangana, hence they agitated and got a separate state.
When the formation of the state was briefly deferred,I have overheard the agitators of Telangaana say that their food and the food of their offspring is snatched away from their mouths.
manfred wrote: I have respect for a prostitute who does what she does to feed her children, for example. If I met one I would try to help, not blame.
So I believe Manfred has no problem with what they did.Ohmyrus also said that in democracies,the majority low class people want to snatch away more and more money from the rich and that is not correct just as rape would still be something wrong even if the majority were pitching for it.
So are the majority of the people of democracies analogous to prostitutes or rapists and does democracy abet these situations of prostitution and/or rape?