“Christians are Monkeys”: Jewish Supremacist Media Cover Up

[Garudaman]

http://www.davidduke.com/?p=39826

May 31, 2013

“Christians are monkeys” reads the latest “price tag” graffiti attack on a Christian church in Jerusalem—just one of many regular anti-Christian outbursts in the “Holy Land.”

[manfred]

נוצרים (הם) קופים right...

Who do you think wrote that? And what did the Christians do in return? Did they bomb something in return? Cut off someone's head?

Or did they get a a bucket and cleaned it off...?

[StrongLove]

Pathetic attempt at deception. Both by the vandal & by you Garudaman. Manfred has a good point. Was there a riot? Were people murdered? I haven't looked into it but I feel pretty confident that there wasn't any murders because the victims don't belong to an evil murderous cult like islam.

[Ozes]

I was about to go and riot but then I remembered I'm not a muslim.

[SAM]

נוצרים (הם) קופים right...

Who do you think wrote that? And what did the Christians do in return? Did they bomb something in return? Cut off someone's head?
Or did they get a a bucket and cleaned it off...?

Jews hate Christians---Christians hate Muslims---Muslims hate Jews.

Muslims -The Good -- Christians-The Bad -- Jews-The Ugly ...

[Nosuperstition]

Well actually,all aborigines that converted to Hinduism are monkeys,I suppose.Monkey in Hindu philosophy is the embodiment of lack of a fixed fixation or steely resolve.Monkey God Hanuman is a form of this principle in early Hinduism.According to Jain texts,he had 14 wives.God Ram with one wife and one heart is an embodiment of steely resolve that is against whimsical modes.Hanuman's devotion to Ram signals that one with fluid heart should remain servile to one with firm resolve.Later Hinduism depicted Hanuman as having no wives at all which might mean that the servant should at times immerse himself so much in the devotion of his lord that he might even abstain from marriage.

This tallies well with Christians saying that pagans were mischievious and fun-loving while we were more serious about life and also with sayings in Telugu that call mischievious persons as monkeys.

[Nosuperstition]

Rama had only one wife and he is hailed as the first purnavataram or full avatar of God Vishnu.Krishna had 8 wives and he too is a full avatar of Vishnu.Both these are in reality kings.Rama preceded Krishna as Treta Yug supposedly preceded Dwapar Yug.Rama belonged to Treta Yug and Krishna to Dwapar Yug.In ancient times kings coronated and elevated themselves to god/God like status or to the status of living gods.Ancient Egyptian Pharoahs and Roman Emperors serve as perfect examples.

In Andhra Pradesh , in the Telangana region,Batukamma,a supposed daughter of a local Chola king is supposed to have been married to Chakrangadudu,an incarnation of Vishnu.Similiarly Lord Venkateshwara of Tirupathi is also wedded to a local princess and he is elevated to status of incarnation of Vishnu according to local Sthala Purana.

So no doubt these kings elevated themselves as incarnations of Vishnu to gain respect from people.Brahmins might have found qualities worthy of praise in Rama such as one wife,one word etc.They might not found such qualities in Krishna,but they might have had to elevate them under the threat of force.That shows why sthira chittam or a firm heart though not found in Krishna is still elevated to status of God.Krishna had 8 wives,that means he had a chanchala chittam or waivering heart,a heart such as that of Hanuman.

As and when the kings are gone,Brahmins once again tell that what is applicable for gods/God is not applicable/acceptable for human beings as had been stated in the Matsya Purana.

But according to the link given below,one of the synonyms for idolatry is hero-worship.Most of these kings are all heroes and Hinduism fits the defination of idolatry perfectly from that P.O.V.No doubt they have been persecuted so severely by Muslims.And for that reason,I do not like Jews that much.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/idolatry

[Nosuperstition]

Up until recently even in Nepal , the king was considered an incarnation of Vishnu.

[Nosuperstition]

In the bygone eras people were literally told that Brahmins are bhusuras or gods on earth.So people did try to elevate themselves to god-like status be it is kings or the priests.Of course one could have questioned such a notion asking them to perform miracles like gods.Then they would have created fake stories that cannot be verified/substantiated and would have let them loose into the public.Given that most people believe anything absurd when told in the name of divinity or religion in an age devoid of reason,people would have believed them and would have started worshipping them.

[Nosuperstition]

There can be one more escape route when one questions your divine credentials.In Hindu texts salutations are offered this way.

Matru devo bhava[i](hail to your mother who is like a god),[i]Pitru devo bhava(hail to your father,who is like a god to you),Acharya devo bhava(hail to the teacher,who is like a god or who is godly).

Now your mother is said to be 10 times more worth than your father and your father ten times more than the teacher who most possibly will be a religious guru/religious priest.This is as per those scriptures.

But then God is more worth than both your mother and father just as is the case in both Islam and Chrisitianity.Why does this case arise?

It arises to state that dharma or righteousness established by divinity has more authority than all the three.Hence laws can be framed and one can say that even your mother , father and religious teacher are not above righteousness when there is a clash of interests.

Respect one accords to his parents is transformed to respect for bhusurottamas(highly esteemed gods on earth) a.k.a Brahmin gods and to daivamsa sambhoota kings or divinely incarnated god-kings or God-kings.

Just as your mother gods or father gods cannot perform miracles,even bhusuroththamas/godly kings cannot always perform miracles.

[Nosuperstition]

Now I do believe that media in West is indeed controlled by Jews.Else why does the CNN show the Hindutva brigade praising Hitler in Gujarat?Whom do the Jews hate most.Of course Hitler.

[Nosuperstition]

Christianity,Judaism and Islam boast that their religions are superior in that they have removed the aspect of God having sex and thus have come clean on sexual morality.Hinduism just like Graeco-Roman paganism on the other hand still hangs on the principle that what is acceptable to gods is not acceptable for human beings as gods do not reap karma while human beings do.

But there exists another aspect of morality where even Abrahamic religions say what is acceptable when done by God is not acceptable when done by human beings.For example when someone pointed out that greatest number of abortions that happen in the world happen due to miscarraiges or natural abortions which can be attributed to God as it is he who created nature,diotima64 came down fuming saying that God is God and you simply should not find fault with him.Clearly if God murders,it is O.K,but if human beings do it it is considered murder.

[Nosuperstition]

just like peaceonearth loves pointing out that yahweh was a violent god (and he/she is right), i'm merely pointing out that pagan gods were, for the most part whore mongers (and that's the least of their problems). calling a spade a spade isn't hatred.

http://www.forum.faithfreedom.org/viewt ... ht=#360180

But that was needed because men died in Islamic wars for the sake of allah and women needed support., the best way to give support to them is open a Harem..

/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=15505&p=202646&hilit=harem+wars#p202646

But whore-mongering continues for as long as there exist wars regardless of whether your deities are whore-mongers or not.

The two greatest sacrifices were the purusha-medha, the human sacrifice, and aswa-medha, the sacrifice of the horse. Both were prevalent in early times, and in simpler form than they survive to us in the doctrinal works and the Epics. A human sacrifice was believed to be of highest potency, but it became extremely rare, as in Egypt, among the ruling and cultured classes. It was perpetuated in India, however, until about half a century ago, by the Dravidian Khonds in Bengal and Madras, and had to be suppressed by British officers.

http://www.forum.faithfreedom.org/viewt ... ht=#360340

And human sacrifices made in wars far exceed the nominal one or two human sacrifices those aboriginal tribesmen like Jews of the time of Jephtah/Khond tribals of India indulged in.

[Nosuperstition]

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=VviBAEtT-JgC&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=Number+of+incarnations+of+Vishnu+according+to+the+Puranas&source=bl&ots=v6-994Ycdu&sig=lonysDXYG7QeZ7t2ouVHa70FCXQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zyUsU-ejJYuFrAfO2oAw&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Number%20of%20incarnations%20of%20Vishnu%20according%20to%20the%20Puranas&f=false

This link shows that people kept on adding and deleting incarnations of Vishnu depending upon the need to deify God-kings.That the number of incarnations of Vishnu varied from Purana to Purana is something I learnt in a General Knowledge book during my school days.

Anyway Christians believe that Christ, God-incarnate will come once again in the end-times and Shia muslims believe Mahdi will come in the end times to purge world of evil.Jews believe Messiah will come to save Judaism and Jews in the end-days.Now all of these are leaders or kings.How exactly can one identify them?Saying that you know them by their fruits will not do since even the Anti-Christ is supposed to be a king/leader or dictator who conquers lot many parts of world claiming to be Christ.

Atleast Hindu end time avatar Kalki will not come for hundreds of thousands of years until the end of Kali-yug.Of course there exist some other local legends which contradict this version and say that Vishnu will incarnate well before that time to purge the world of evil.

[Nosuperstition]

All these versions can be equally true in that the avatars of Vishnu(meaning the Omnipresent one) are innumerable according to the Bhagavatha Purana and according to Bhagavad Gita , Vishnu creates himself in flesh as and when there is a rise in evil in the sub-continent.(yadaa yadaa hi dharmasya,glaanirbhavati bhaarata,abhyutthaanam.h adharmasya,tadaatmaanM sRRijaamyaham. verse).

[Nosuperstition]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS6051U64v8

Now if black demon kings of South India and/or the sub-continent were not stable in their sexual relations per the above video,then per the video below even mob of bloodthirsty white men had fickle mentality.People who are fickle might not stick to marital fidelity.

And Hindu women of those periods dressed exactly as their male counterparts as both had to work in fields in simmering heat.The lesser the clothing the better with regards to sweating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTmlYKiLBHI

[Nosuperstition]

Now king Solomon who killed off Uriah,his Hittite commander using deceit and took for himself Bathsheba,his beautiful wife and had a harem of many hundreds of females ,them being perhaps of defeated nations behaved more or less like a chimp troop that conquers the lands of other chimps and is held in high esteem by many Jews.Perhaps it is for this reason,the Muslims called Jews offspring of apes and pigs,though all Jews might not endorse what Solomon did.So some Jews are also monkeys going by the stories of pagan Romans and pagan Hindus.

[Nosuperstition]

Dont forget catholic church was very zealous in killing infidels , converting and intermarrying with leftovers.Muslims did same with conquered nation. In case of India there were too many infidels to kill. Also Hindus fought back both on battle front as well as on theological ground.

http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2243&p=37910&hilit=Catholic+Church+leftovers#p37910

Now the Catholic Church also had followers who also behaved like apes and who were never excommunicated even posthumously.Puli kadupuna ledi puttuney is a Telugu saying.It means will a deer be born to a tiger?I know there also exists another saying.donga kadupuna dongey puttaalani ledu(it is not necessary that a the son of a thief is also a thief).But I am conveniently ignoring it for time being i.e cherry picking as they do in case play of words of religious books.

Now antineoetc will come back and say that Christians replaced those lands with a better civilisation.Now what counts as a better civilisation is another topic.Buddhist Emperor Ashoka was the first Emperor who instituted hospitals to serve the needy in the Indian sub-continent.However according to Ambedkar, later Hindus closed down the study of medicine citing surgeries and dead bodies as the cause of pollution and spread of epidemics.Now which is a better civilisation,Hindu or Buddhist,what can one say?

[Nosuperstition]

It is not King Solomon,but his father David who killed off Uriah,the Hittite commander with deceit,for the sake of acquiring his beautiful wife Bathsheba.Such are the ways of life in any authoritarian form of government.David is also quite highly esteemed amongst Jews.

antineoetc always mentions about the inferiority of Aztecs citing their heart ripping rituals.Now THHuxley of the Old Forum said that to see your offspring die off pre-maturely due to hunger is no less a bane for parents.Forget about parents,it is no less painful for a child.But then that will always be the case in a world where food supply always runs short of population increase.Killing off rebel adults of insubordinate nations by branding them as criminals occurs even today in many parts of world. So why find fault with the Aztecs.

And modern day West might have constructed gigantic super structure marvels with its innovative Engineering skills ,but when the Conquistadors viewed the Aztec super structures such were not to be found in the then West,they too were mesmerised. So once again what exactly is a superior civilisation depends on the criterion you selectively pick up to define such things.