MesMorial wrote:skynightblaze wrote:^^
Get lost miserable TROLL! Take your idiotic rantings some where else.
Would you mind if I agreed with his logic, and would you mind if I said that he is right about Qur'an-Islam, and you are wrong?
I would mind it because you are clearly wrong. You have not yet completely got out of Quran alone cult. Slowly and steadily you will realize that Muhammad too had a history and a life. Remember its all about investing your entire life in a religion and hence before one decides to convert to islam , knowing character of Muhammad is extremely important. If Muhammad was a fraud the credibility of quran goes down the drain and therefore logically I am required to dig deep into the life of this man before making a decision to convert to islam. I cannot take quran as a reference to understand Muhammad because of 2 reasons:
1) It hardly contains any information on character of Muhammad .
2) More ever quran cannot be taken as a testimony for assuring Muhammad's clean character because it itself is under test . It would be like a criminal asking for believing in his innocence on his own testimony.
Mesmorial wrote:I do not care much for Hadith, because no-one can prove a single hadith and thus they are disqualified automatically.
The findings of Sanaa manuscripts matches with what is written in the ahadith. Historic evidence supports ahadith regarding compilation of the quran so how can you claim that no one can prove a single ahadith?