That's the sand getting in them, Farside.farside wrote:The Hadiths are wonderful! They bring tears of joy to my eyes.
‘Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs and literary traditions. They neither intermarry nor eat together, and indeed they belong to two different civilisations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions.’ Muhammad Ali Jinnah
This is actually a silly question - it narrows everything down to a 'black or white'. There is not a single religious tradition that is 100% historically genuine and is only legal in the eyes of those who own it and thus claim the 'universal truth'.The Cat wrote:Are the prophetic hadiths legally and historically genuine?
Abraham= H'ammu'rab(b)i, Historical Muhammad=Benjamin of Tiberias. Theological: Mahmud from Najran Islam: Syncretic Israelite Yahwishm Deity: nameless, epithets Dsr, El Qutbay, ʼAlâhâ, Allāh. Ka'ba: Kutha => Samaria => Petra=> Makkah. Hijrah 622: Petra => Kerak