Chiclets wrote:fudgy wrote:Ex_muslimah wrote:If you care to actually look at texts and not be so ignorant, you'd discover that Durga is a warrior goddess and she signifies to gain happiness, you must kill your own demons in life and she took this form because she wants the best for her devotees.
You'll find a lot of gods and goddesses have multiple hands, lets see your comment for the gents they can do manly things and give women oral!
Which I think dear chiclet, you should actually READ about other religions before spouting out stuff like you have.
Thank God the Persian and the Arabs came in the subcontinent, and relieved many of this nonsense.
Only to be replaced with believing that the words of the baby fudger were the the words of god![]()
Here are some more of your weird beliefs ...
The baby fudger said, 'When you eat, do not wipe your hands till you have licked it, or had it licked by somebody else."
The baby fudger said, "He who drinks in silver utensils is only filling his abdomen with Hell Fire."
The baby fudger forbade laughing at a person who passes wind.![]()
The baby fudger's alter ego, Allah has cursed those women who have tattooing and those who remove hair from their faces to look beautiful.
The baby fudger has cursed the lady who uses false hair.![]()
The baby fudger said, "None of you should walk, wearing one shoe only; he should either put on both shoes or put on no shoes whatsoever."
gupsfu wrote:When someone uses the "taken out of context" argument without explaining what it's really supposed to mean, you know he's lying.
gupsfu wrote:When someone uses the "taken out of context" argument without explaining what it's really supposed to mean, you know he's lying.
Cassie wrote:BOT wrote:YOU LOOTED India. You took the treasures that you unearthed from the temples and other ancient sites in India to Britian. You PUMPED your "industrial revolution" on the raw materials you LOOTED from your colonies. You built "infrastrature" ONLY to strengthen and sustain your occupation. You built railway networks ONLY to easily transport arms and ammunitions witin the occupied territory. You errected boards outside your bars and offices, which wrote "NO INDIANS BUT DOGS". You built DANG, you apologist for imperialism.
At least the Brits left the temples intact. You razed Hindu temples to the ground, after you massacred all the males and sent the women and children across the Hindu Kush as slaves. You looted Northern India. You committed genocide against Hindus - the Brits never did that. There are no evil men like Muslims.
fudgy wrote:No kid I say try again. This time I have raised the bar. I will give you two canday. How about Hershey and M&M?
gupsfu wrote:When someone uses the "taken out of context" argument without explaining what it's really supposed to mean, you know he's lying.
fudgy wrote:No kid I say try again. This time I have raised the bar. I will give you two canday. How about Hershey and M&M?
gupsfu wrote:When someone uses the "taken out of context" argument without explaining what it's really supposed to mean, you know he's lying.
RichardTheLionheart wrote:Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:My issue is with non-Islamic terrorism and violence.
No it's not.
Your issue is with everything that is non-Islamic, even books critical of Islam and the success of non-Islamic nations you share a border with such as India.
You like so many Muslims cannot accept that Islam lies at the root of all your problems.
All you can do is lash out with violence and insults. As we'll see in your opinions about British society etc etc...
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:And you bring up 7/7 as if it was just an unprovoked terrorist act, but it wasn't.
So how many Iraqis took part in the act?
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:But I do care about British cruelties against the Muslim world, from the empire days till now.
The Empire is long gone just like the Caliphate... get over it.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:No, it is YOU who brought the conflict to Muslim doors, houses, by bombing and terrorizing them - like in Iraq.
No. Rushdie happened before any conflict we had with Saddam.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:And I reiterate, 7/7 was but a small revenge.
Sure, and the bombing of a Panamanian airline:- Alas Chiricanas Flight 00901, in 1994 was in revenge for .. oh hang on this is before the invasion of Iraq and Panama isn't involved in Iraq anyway.
Islamic terror doesn't need revenge as a motive, it kills when it likes and makes excuses afterwards.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:Which makes 7/7 a revenge.
See above.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:7/7 was to remove Tony the poodle.
It failed miserably, he was still in power afterwards.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:You butcher Iraqis and this must not be an issue with their Muslim brothers?
What was the issue you had with Saddam, who was your friend a few years ago?
Saddam butchered Muslims too.
How come Muslims didn't attack Iraqi embassies like you did over a set of cartoons?
What was the issue you did not have with Saddam over his oppression of Muslims, surely those acts made him your enemy?
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:MUBARAK is a western DOG.
So yes, I was right, you are wrong.
Mubarak may receive aid and support from western nations but Egypt is not a western regime.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:You destroyed infrastructure as well as the existing system. Yes, you are partially responsible for all the violence in Iraq.
But you are directly responsible for the hundred thousands killed directly due to your attacks.
Revenge is pending, by your logic.
No. Islamic violence is expected wherever Islam infects.
It is the very nature of Islam.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:You forget that you are directly responsible for the death you caused through military strikes. They run into hundreds of thousands.
You are delving into nonsensical issues.
The violence in Pakistan is due to American and Nato terrorism in Afghanistan and Tribal areas. Nato planes and drones butcher innocent men women adn children on almost routine basis, you think the tribals there - the only people who made British colonist pee in their pants in the empire days- would sit quiet at this?
Islamic violence was happening in what is now Afghanistan a long time before America was discovered and a long time before Britain had an Empire.
Such as the violent conquest of Zaranj in 661.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:The violence in India is due terrorism against minorities - like Gujarat riots, church burning, nun raping, Mosque demolishing, and other rioting events. It is also due to India's illegal and brutal occupation of Kashmir - something that YOU are responsible for. You authorized UNFAIR partition. You Britishers have A LOT to pay.
We gave partition to Pakistan because Muslims demanded a separate Islamic state.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:YOU are the problem.
I wasn't alive in Caesarea Maritima in 638 or Zaranj in 661.. but Islam was. And it was murdering back then just like it is now.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:Says me.
And you're a world authority?![]()
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:You BET your last your penny that it does.
Saddam being a dictator has nothing to do with your attacking Iraq. You befriended Saddam when he was in your interest. You befriend dictators like Husseni Mubarak, and a whole host of other dictatorships. The excuses you put forth are SHAMEFUL.
It's called political expediency. It's the same as Pakistan being allied with the Chinese.. even though China is killing Uigur Muslims in Xinjiang.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:YOU LOOTED India. You took the treasures that you unearthed from the temples and other ancient sites in India to Britian. You PUMPED your "industrial revolution" on the raw materials you LOOTED from your colonies. You built "infrastrature" ONLY to strengthen and sustain your occupation. You built railway networks ONLY to easily transport arms and ammunitions witin the occupied territory. You errected boards outside your bars and offices, which wrote "NO INDIANS BUT DOGS".
You built DANG, you apologist for imperialism.
Really, a BIG REVENGE IS PENDING ON YOU.
That isn't true.
As it has been pointed out to you by an Indian called “Ram”.
Britain achieved more good things in India in a couple of centuries then Islam had archived in a Millennia.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:Qur'an tells us even a MORE different story.
No it doesn't. The Koran is not a history book. You cannot ascertain anything about Islamic history from it alone.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:This have everything to do with fact that your society is rampant with paedophilia, while Muslim societies are squeaky clean compared to your filth ridden societies.
It's illegal. People caught having sex with children are criminals who are put in prison. And are regarded as the worst kind of criminal.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:YOu may be old enough to remember that. I don't give a fig. I only know, as a father, that if I were to be given a chance to raise my daughter in Britian or Pakistan, I would not only immediately choose Pakistan without a second thought, but I would spit at the person for even mentioning Britain as an option. That's what I think about your societies as far as satety of children goes.
I suppose that's why so many of your country-folk come here to live then?
Look at any report on crime in any country, you'll find the UK has far less of a problem with crime than Pakistan in just about every category.
Richard wrote:YES it is.BOT wrote: No it's not.
Richard wrote:BOT wrote: You like so many Muslims cannot accept that Islam lies at the root of all your problems.
And you like many non-Muslims cannot accept that non-Islam is the heart of all the problems of the world.
Richard wrote:BOT wrote:Islamic terror doesn't need revenge as a motive, it kills when it likes and makes excuses afterwards.
And non-Muslim terror doesn't need any excuses, it oppresses and kills Muslims (and others) when it feels like and makes excuses afterwards.
Richard wrote:BOT wrote:See above.
You see above.
Richard wrote:BOT wrote:No. Islamic violence is expected wherever Islam infects.
No. Non-Muslim violence is expected wherever Islam goes. You committed violence, revenge is pending.
Richard wrote:BOT]
It is the very nature of Islam. [/quote]
It is the very nature of non-Islam.[/quote]
[quote="Richard wrote:BOT]
Such as the violent conquest of Zaranj in 661.[/quote]
Such as the violent conquest of Britain by Romans[/quote]
[quote="Richard wrote:[
gupsfu wrote:When someone uses the "taken out of context" argument without explaining what it's really supposed to mean, you know he's lying.
charleslemartel wrote:Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:
Which makes 7/7 a revenge.
So take revenge, and don't cry when you get the whip.
You butcher Iraqis and this must not be an issue with their Muslim brothers?
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:IT IS. You created the mayhem by invading Iraq and destroying the existing system their.
The people DIRECTLY killed due to your military attacks number in the hundred thousands. While the people killed overall surpass the milion mark - and they are half yoru responsibility, for you destroyed the whole country.
That is rich coming from a Muslim apologist. Have you read any history of Muhammad and the Caliphs? You are reaping what your uswa hasana has sown.
You forget that you are directly responsible for the death you caused through military strikes. They run into hundreds of thousands.
Read the bloody Muslim history of conquests.
Also read your hate manual called Quran which teaches nothing but hatred and violence against other humans.
The violence in India is due terrorism against minorities - like Gujarat riots, church burning, nun raping, Mosque demolishing, and other rioting events. It is also due to India's illegal and brutal occupation of Kashmir - something that YOU are responsible for. You authorized UNFAIR partition. You Britishers have A LOT to pay.[b]
Thank your stars that India is ruled by dhimmis. And you have proved that you have zero knowledge of history. It was Muslims who demanded partition and got it. As I said, make Britishers pay as much as you want but don't start crying and whining when Brits kick your butt back.
Yes we have.Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:You have no right to remove any government.
Just as Muhammad attacked the nations which did not believe in Islam, we have the right to remove any Islamic government we choose.
In doing so, we will be only following the footsteps of your uswa hasana. You have any objections to that?
So why do you come crying and complaining like a cowering child when you take revenge and your butt is kicked in response?Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:Really, a BIG REVENGE IS PENDING ON YOU.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:There is a verse in the Qur'an to that effect.
[Allah forbids you not with regard to those who fight you not for your faith, nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them. For Allah loves those who are just. Allah only forbids you with regard to those who fight you for your faith, and drive you out of your homes and support others in driving you out, from turning to them for protection (or taking them as wali). Those who seek their protection they are indeed wrong- doers.] (Al-Mumtahinah 60: 8-9)
The words of an imaginary Allah carry no weight; he contradicted himself many times, spoke of silly beliefs of 7th century which Muslims foolishly try to project as scientific miracles.
WE are to deal kindly and justly wtih peaceful kufar. Undoubtly it doesn't include you, as you justify invasion, imperialsm and looting.
Just like you did by fanning out of the Arabian desert to loot and murder the world? Remember, it was Muslims who attacked the other countries, and not the other way round.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:You cannot fight against peaceful non-believers. Only aggressive non-believers, like British who attack Muslims
We are not only not to fight peaceful non-believers, we are to deal with them justly and kindly..
Muslims too are attacked when they are aggressive and plan terror attacks.
Planning attacks is a big enough crime which justifies a military attack and killings; remember your uswa hasana.
Heck, Muslims are always aggressive as they plan to hoist the flag of Islam all over the world; that is an act of aggression and Muslims have no rights to complain.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:This have everything to do with fact that your society is rampant with paedophilia, while Muslim societies are squeaky clean compared to your filth ridden societies.
So why do Muslims hanker for living in the filth ridden societies? Hypocrisy, thy name is Muslim.
Balls_of_Titanium_1 wrote:There is a big difference then between the above and between a girl getting deflowered at school, parents shockingly finding that their teenage daughter is pregnant (actually, it's no longer a shock in Britain), thoughts about dumping the child or to briniging it to this world, and the resulting tensions. Heck, we cherish that difference.
It isn't any worse than a nine year old getting deflowered by a 56 year old uswa hasana. It isn't any worse than raping a woman the same night you have killed her husband. It isn't any worse than killing the men, capturing the widows and then raping, enslaving and selling them off. Don't come talking to us about morality. Morality and Muhammad have nothing in common apart from the letter "M".
YOu may be old enough to remember that. I don't give a fig. I only know, as a father, that if I were to be given a chance to raise my daughter in Britian or Pakistan, I would not only immediately choose Pakistan without a second thought, but I would spit at the person for even mentioning Britain as an option. That's what I think about your societies as far as satety of children goes.
Even if you are able to persuade one or two other Muslims, I would be greatly grateful to you. There will be one more benefit to you; you will find it difficult to get a 53 year old groom for your 6 years old daughter in the filth ridden western societies. That kind of moral living is possible only in Dar Ul Islam.
So when are you moving?
fudgy wrote:Nope kid. Last chance, three candies: Hershey, Snickers, and M&M. Seems like you aren't interested in the candies, and if you are of Indian descent you better hit your ABC and multiplication table son. Otherwise, you will have a very angry pappa if he finds out that you are wasting your time in FFI instead of studying.
gupsfu wrote:When someone uses the "taken out of context" argument without explaining what it's really supposed to mean, you know he's lying.
Return to Breaking News On Islam
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests