Bank of Pictures & Cartoons

[The Cat]

Women In Islam...

Warning: Ending this page, hard to bear pictures, like of acid defaced women
If likely offended, or faint of heart, please refrain from looking at them...
A second -and last- warning will be made, just before we get to them.

From child bride...


To begging the question...











Abul Kasem wrote many major articles on this dreadful topic...
Women In Islam: An exegesis
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... _Islam.htm
Unveiling the Islamic Veil
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... c_veil.htm

Islamic Women's Day
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/AbulKasem50315.htm
Women's Paradise
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... radise.htm

Sex & Sexuality in Islam
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... nIslam.htm
Holy and Blessed Family: An Example to Follow?
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... family.htm

[The Cat]

"I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-Fire were women....[because] they are ungrateful
to their husbands and they are deficient in intelligence. " Sahih Bukhari V 2, B 24, N 541.

From the innocent bride-child dream...


To their lasting fate.


Hell is for Muslimahs, here as well as in the Hereafter...

In the above, women are hang from their hairs because they did show them to a stranger.


Here, they are hooked by their tongues for having talked to a stranger without permission.

We should note that Muhammad's face is showing in these 15th century Persian calligraphies.

Deja vu all over again...


Did Women's Status Improve With Islam (by Ali Sina)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/si ... _islam.htm
Slave Girls and Their Rights in Islam (by Susan Stephan)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SS ... egirls.htm

Islam's Shame: Lifting the Veil of Tears (by Ibn Warraq)
http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/ ... _17_4.html
The Veil Of Equality & Justice (answering-Islam)
http://answering-islam.org/BehindVeil/btv3.html#CH3

[The Cat]

The Demographic War

For the moment it ain't that perceptible...




But in twenty years from now it'll be that huge!




Is Islam a sado-masochist cult for male chauvinists?




How Islam is 'protecting' women's decency...


Think!


Winston Churchill: ''A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.
The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife,
or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.''

The Old Main: Women in Islam (replete with sad stories)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=23
When to Beat Women (abudosama, around Q.4.34)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=681

Muhammad Old Main:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=18
Does Islam permit rape? (by witty_boy)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=59442

[The Cat]

What a waste of human intelligence Islam truly is!

Quoting from Ibn Warraq
http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/ ... _17_4.html

Islam is deeply anti-woman. Islam is the fundamental cause of the repression of Muslim women and remains the major obstacle
to the evolution of their position.[1] Islam has always considered women as creatures inferior in every way: physically, intellectually,
and morally. This negative vision is divinely sanctioned in the Koran, corroborated by the hadiths, and perpetuated by the commentaries
of the theologians, the custodians of Muslim dogma and ignorance. (...) The Koran remains for all Muslims, not just "fundamentalists,"
the uncreated word of God Himself. It is valid for all times and places; its ideas are absolutely true and beyond all criticism.

Islamic wheel of (untold) domestic violence

On adultery the Koran 24.4 says: "Those that defame honourable women and cannot produce four witnesses shall be given eighty lashes."
Of course, Muslim jurists will only accept four male witnesses. These witnesses must declare that they have "seen the parties in the very act of carnal conjunction." Once an accusation of fornication and adultery has been made, the accuser himself or herself risks punishment if he or she does not furnish the necessary legal proofs. Witnesses are in the same situation. If a man were to break into a woman's dormitory and rape half a dozen women, he would risk nothing since there would be no male witnesses. Indeed the victim of a rape would hesitate before going in front of the law, since she would risk being condemned herself and have little chance of obtaining justice.

Little did Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, realize how literally true his words were when he said in a 1944 speech: [13] "No nation can rise to the height of glory unless your women are side by side with you. We are victims of evil customs. It is a crime against humanity that our women are shut up within the four walls of the houses as prisoners."

[The Cat]

To my very surprise, in the 'Caricatures of Muhammad' thread
The pictures which really did offend Muslims were like those:






From the movie 'Submission' for which Theo van Gogh has been killed...





Must be because the veil (and the sword) carries ''The Flag Of Islam'.

Now, is this Islam against the West or, instead... a frenzy war over the thongs versus the burqa?

[The Cat]

In the 'Caricatures of Muhammad' a poster named JihadJedi came to answer me:
''The Cat, why post naked women in islamic dress, why do this? You are very dirty.''
So I said to myself: hey, I did touch a sore point in his Islamic armor. How come?
Muslims are screened from most anything you can come up with, except...





Is this our very particular 'Arc Of Triumph'?




What, then, polygamous Muslims are really asking for? More?




Nature as per Islam...




I find this one (Miss France) extremely loaded with deep symbolisms...

[The Cat]

2nd WARNING: right after this post, the page will end with hard to bear pictures
Those likely to be offended, or faint of heart, should skip the rest of this page, right after this post.

















We're about to find out, some hidden reasons behind the Islamic dress for women


-6



-5



-4



-3




-2




-1

[The Cat]

Pictures of hard to bear acid defaced women. You've been warned trice now...

The Face of Islam: Honor Killings.
5-



4-



3-



2-



1-
Mukhtar Mai (Pakistan)

Her story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukhtaran_Bibi
Her courage: http://michaelthompson.org/mai/index.php?o=20050610





Saira Liaqat, age 26.








Gang raped in Sweden (or how Islam blames the victims)

On March 2006, in his Friday sermon, Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali (the 'Meat Imam') likened immodestly dressed
women to meat that attracted predators and suggested that they were to blame for being set upon by men.
“If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street . . . and the cats come and eat it,
whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem,” he said.
See: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 616185.ece
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index. ... le&sid=665

Abul Kasem (after quoting Q.33.59 and Ibn Kathir comments on it)
Muslim women must always keep their 'meat' covered whenever they venture out. Infidel women who do not hide their 'meat' inside Jilbab and Hijab are either maid servants or whores. The white Australian women who do not dress Islamically are maidservants or whores. In Islam, Muslim men are allowed to have unlimited sexual intercourse with maid servants and/or sexual slaves. A Muslim man commits rape if and only if he has sex with a Muslim woman out of wedlock. Having forced sex with an infidel woman does not at all constitute rape, Islamically speaking.

The natural conclusion is that Muslim men are completely free to Islamically rape these infidel women, if these whores fall in Muslim men's hands. There is no point in accusing this grand Imam. He knows Islam inside out. He is confident what he said is Islamically correct. The Qur'an backs him up one hundred percent, as explicated by none other than ibn Kathir. Blame the Qur'an before you blame this Sheik of Islam.

In fact, this ‘meat’ Imam candidly explained his speech by saying that his reference of ‘meat’ was directed towards whores and prostitutes. What he meant is very clear: white Australian women who dress scantily and provocatively (un Islamically) and venture into an Islamic territory, such as Lakemba, Auburn, Punchbowl, Granville (the Muslim subarbs of Sydney) are truly sluts and prostitutes, perfectly suitable for Islamic rape. The Qur’an allows Muslim men to sexually molest these infidel women are no better than maidservants or prostitutes.

On Honor killings and the dreadful situation of women in Islam, please see:
Quoting Abul Kasem, Part II: Wowen's Status in Islam. It has many, many, inner links too!
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32120
On Honor killing:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewt ... 938#642938
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewt ... 190#685190

Wowen Under Islam (by Adrian Morgan for Western Resistance)
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/a ... 03797.html
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/a ... 03795.html
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/a ... 03796.html

[The Cat]

The Face of Islam: Honor Killing (2)
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing
National Geographic:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... lling.html
Stop Honor Killings
http://www.stophonourkillings.com/
Among the Palestinians
http://www.worldandi.com/newhome/public ... /clpub.asp
Blood Feuds & Honor Killings
http://www.gendercide.org/case_honour.html
Honor Killings (by Frodo Baggins, Old resource Center)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=419

Gulnaz Bibi



Zahina Perveen




She was sixteen and wanted to got outside: she also had her ears cut off!

[The Cat]

The Face of Islam: Honor Killings (3)

All pictures from: http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/06 ... -pakistan/

























Is truly: All is well that ends well? NOT IN THE CASE OF ISLAM!

Photographer: Ulrik Jantzen.

[The Cat]

The Danish Cartoons Controversy... A recap.

The dozen of Danish cartoons, which triggered a world retaliation by Muslims,
were first published the 30 September 2005 in the Jyllands-Posten newspaper.

See: http://zombietime.com/mohammed_image_ar ... _cartoons/




They all then were published in an Egyptian newspaper, the Al-Fagr, the 17/10/05.
Precisely, nothing happened. No riot, no turmoil, no burning of embassies...

See: http://www.sullivan-county.com/id3/denmark2.htm
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atla ... index.html


The riots began in January 2006 after a top Danish Imam, Ahmad Abu Laden added pics
to a report he made. Thanks to him, we now know how Muhammad really looked like:

That's rather Jacques Barrot, in a pigsqualer contest hold in France on the 15/08/2005!


Most of the placards already shown here came in reaction to Ahmad's deception...



First, the West crawled in dhimmitude and many newspapers refused to publish them!



But now we know that this controversy became both a blessing and a warning:
It really started to electroshock our petrified notion that ''Islam meant peace''...
Then, the Pope's controversy only confirmed what was at stake: our freedoms!

[The Cat]

The Pope controversy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Bened ... ontroversy
The Pope Benedict XVI Islam controversy arose from a lecture delivered on 12 September 2006 by Pope Benedict XVI at the University of Regensburg in Germany. The pope had previously served as professor of theology at the university, and his lecture was entitled "Faith, Reason and the University — Memories and Reflections". The lecture received much condemnation and praise from political and religious authorities. Many Islamic politicians and religious leaders registered their protest against what they said was an insulting mischaracterization of Islam, contained in the quotation by the pope of the following passage:

“Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things
only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

The passage originally appeared in the “Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia”, written in 1391 as an expression of the views of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, one of the last Christian rulers before the Fall of Constantinople to the Muslim Ottoman Empire, on such issues as forced conversion, holy war, and the relationship between faith and reason.











15 pages of cartoons like this: http://www.cagle.com/news/PopeRemarks/main.asp




See also:
A blog on the question:
http://gypsyscholarship.blogspot.com/20 ... peror.html
The complete speech:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/bened ... rg_en.html

The emperor must have known that surah 2.256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion". According to some of the experts, this is probably one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Qur'an, concerning holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels", he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness, a brusqueness that we find unacceptable, on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying:

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God", he says, "is not pleased by blood - and not acting reasonably (σὺν λόγω) is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats... To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death...".

The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God's nature.

[The Cat]

The Danish Cartoon Controversy (2)
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atla ... index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jyllands-P ... ontroversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o ... ontroversy
See them all annotated: http://www.rt66.com/~korteng/SmallArms/Cartoons.htm















The Cat answering Rajah (10/02/2006)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewt ... 235#289235
Well, Rajah, this is only showing how idolatrous toward their prophet Muslims really are. It was said that its depiction was to be done away in order to avoid idolatry. Muslim's reactions show the exact opposite. First and foremost, how can we insult Islam by images of a prophet we never knew how he looks like? Quoting Ophelia Benson: ''Actually, the whole taboo is empty, it's a taboo without a referent. (...)

Then Rajah, you underlined that this is what ''we have requested before. That really has helped the Muslim Ummah'' and ''Thanks for uniting the Muslims.'' I always felt that our win over Islam is first and foremost relying on the Media coverage. What Muslim's silly overreaction has done is to strenghten our social immunity system. What was needed in the West is to the common folk to realize how backward, medieval and violently immature Islam stands at its core. And now this has been realized.

Here: ''This time, Arabs and Muslims have entered a just war... but emerged from it with ruinous results that have led to a new distortion of Islam in the West,'' Saleh al-Qallab, a former Jordanian minister, wrote in the Saudi daily Asharq al-Awsat. ''We should be brave enough to admit that attempts to deepen the gap between the Christian West and the Muslim East have led to an Arab and Muslim defeat in this round.''

This awareness, this strengthening of our social immunity system, will result in many political decisions. You can say adios from now on to the generous immigration that allowed so many Muslims to a better life. You considered our social programs as the Jizya rightfully paid to you. The Muslim's world in the East will be isolated, then it'll implose. Europe and America will strongly look forward to alternatives to Middle East oil. Middle East economy will totally collapse. You came out of the desert and you'll end in a desert, where Islam belongs anyway.

[The Cat]

Planet of the Imam Apes...
Please, don't shake the tree!

Ahmadinejad


Khomeiny


The four steps of Jihad:
1. Infiltration and dissimulation (taqqiya). Concessions asked.
2. Social Peace taken as hostage: more concessions asked.
3. Creating multiplying Islamic inlands as more concessions.
4. Final Jihad: no concession given according to the Quran...

''How many a township have We destroyed! As a raid by night, or while they sleep at noon,
our terror came upon them. No plea had they, when our terror came upon them.'' --Quran 7.4


''Warfare is ordained to you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you... Quran 2.216



Q.2:193 And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah (alone).

[The Cat]

This Planet of the Imams was a popular sketch in the 'Caricatures of Muhammad' thread.
A poster named 'Brigitte' wrote: 'Hi The Cat, seeing the pic from "planet of the apes"
made me laugh so much! Because, when in muslim country, one of my children always
keeps saying "living here is like living on the planet of the apes!"

Let's have a little more, like a movie trailer:
Coming soon to your nearest theater and... bedroom!

Jihad MMXX: Eurabia, the Nightmare!


Mahmoud (Mammoth) Ahmadinejad as the Ape leader



The terrible alliance made with Osama 'Ape' Ladin and Ahmadine-APE is excruciating...



The situation keeps on worsening as the bloody plot is now burning all over Europe...



Will the humans be definitively reduced into Apes' slaves? A must see, guaranteed in cold blood!


Don't miss the following program either: God's'Allah keeps a teeth on you!

Some threads of mine:
The Birth of Eurabia -Bat Ye'or
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=40437
The Fate of Lebanon & Of The World.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25003
Universal Vs Islamic Declarations of Human Rights
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38701

[The Cat]

Islamic Godz'Allah eats roasted trains & buses loaded with people at breakfast...




In India




In London




In Israel




In Madrid, everywhere...




Godz'Allah is never to be blamed: it's His nature after all!


An exegesis of Islamic Peace (by Syed Kamran Mirza)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SK ... _peace.htm
An Exegesis on Jihad in Islam (by Syed K. Mirza)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SKM/jihad.htm
An interview with Syed Kamran Mirza
http://www.aina.org/news/20090119083204.htm

[The Cat]

On our dhimmitude...















Winston Churchill on Mohammedanism:
The River War, 1st edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 (London, Green & Co, 1899).

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. (...)

The influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

1. Churchill used the term 'Mohammedanism' instead of Islam, which is much more appropriate for the Cult of Muhammad Islam truly is. The term 'Mahommedans' was also in used until the mid 1960s. To al-Ghazali the right term to define Islam should rather be al-Iman (The Faith).

2. He wrote 'Moslems' instead of Muslims, which in Arabic really means ''one who is evil and unjust'' when pronounced with a z, as in English! Still many 'Mahommedans' organizations use the spelling of Moslems! I guess they don't even know... Arabic or al-Ghazali for that matter!

Winston Churchill (& grandson) On Islam.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30848
Winston Churchill's grandson says radical Islam at war with the world
http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusiv ... ml?id=3158

[The Cat]

Usual Islamic Outrage
But how far should we get used to this mental terror?















The Islamic Psycho (by Abul Kasem)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... psycho.htm
Islamic Drug (by Abul Kasem)
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/ab ... c_drug.htm

[The Cat]

From moron to martyr:
The Islamic understanding of enlightenment!













A day in the peaceful Muslim's life

[The Cat]

''I've seen the future, and it's bloody...''

''...Lo! we are guiltless of you and all that ye worship beside Allah. We have done with you.
And there hath arisen between us and you hostility and hate for ever...'' Q.60.4 (-Chr.91-).


Rather 2045: with Norway, Sweden and Denmark as North Eurabia!






Premonition of Civil War, Salvador Dali, oil on canvas, 1936.

From an incredible site, loaded with great paintings & top artists' drawings... A must see!
http://www.allthingsbeautiful.com/all_t ... iful/iraq/