manfred wrote:This article contains nothing that hasn't been dealt with... (except for a few more ad hominems)
So why are you re-haching your old, refuted article for the fourth time?
Why don't you debate the issue in thread provided, instead of your usual spam and run? Read the thread, pick a point you want to talk about, and then perhaps you can be taken seriously.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest