Page 6 of 6

Re: Comments: KhaliL F VS BOT1

PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:09 pm
by ShoeShiner
Debunker wrote to Khalil:

First off, please take my advice and refrain from overuse of phrases like, strawman, red herrings, argumentum ad hominem, tu quoque, etc Using these frequently doesn't help prove that you're a sophisticated strong debater who's winning the debate, in fact, if anything, it weakens your arguments. So try not to hide a lot behind them.


Talk about having a twisted mind! Instead of thinking "well, maybe I shouldn't use logical fallacies", he accuses Khalil of hiding behind the pointing out of these logical fallacies and says that pointing them out in fact weakens his argument. I thought spewing logical fallacies in a debate weakens the arguments, but what do I know?

Re: Comments: KhaliL F VS BOT1

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:37 pm
by raghy
Khalil did not have to debate with Debunker. In his discussion, Debunker practically asserted Khalil's claim against Quran. I don't understand why he is crying 'foul'! I have not seen any twisting or turning from Khalil; in fact, Khalil did not even go in to any debate IMO. I hope Debunker may do better next time. It is important to quote references to bolster one's arguments. Khalil has the right to ask for references. As a debator, Debunker is obliged to provide them. Good luck to you Debunker.

Re: Comments: KhaliL F VS BOT1

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:25 pm
by yeezevee
I didn't read all posts of debunker vs Khalil ., but I like these posts on that.

debunker to Enlightened, on Khalil
Please answer him! If you don't know Arabic then here are the 5 verses in questions: ... 6.qmt.html

What a frigging liar!
and fudgy's response to debunker
^^oh dear, that has to be Maulana Khalil's best quotes.

lol.. .. I don't know why but Maulana Khalil seem to give a special treatment to debunker., .. May be because .. he is "EE" Forgive Maulana Khalil and mullah yeezevee for that dear debunker., any way FINISH YOUR THESIS.. ASAP..

with best