Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Upon Ahmed Bahgat's request for a new thread on one on one "debate?" I am posting my first objection here:
Quran claims in 4:82 that had it not been the Book of God, there would have been a lot of contradictions in it. And there are contradictions in it. Read the following verses in contrast:
41:11 vs. 21:30
54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7
42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71
45:14 and 109:6 vs. 9:5 and 9:29
52:35 vs. 19:9 and 19:67
57:22 vs. 53:39, 44:3 and 44:4
63:5 vs. 4:107
69:35 and 69:37 vs. 37:62 to 37:66
So Quran is proving itself to be NOT FROM GOD.
Quran claims in 4:82 that had it not been the Book of God, there would have been a lot of contradictions in it. And there are contradictions in it. Read the following verses in contrast:
41:11 vs. 21:30
54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7
42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71
45:14 and 109:6 vs. 9:5 and 9:29
52:35 vs. 19:9 and 19:67
57:22 vs. 53:39, 44:3 and 44:4
63:5 vs. 4:107
69:35 and 69:37 vs. 37:62 to 37:66
So Quran is proving itself to be NOT FROM GOD.
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
letstalk is hard on Ahmed Bahgat. letstalk is trying to pull A_B on to a debate., that is wonderful
Any way let us put the verses that letstalk put out and may contradict each other..
It is just nonsense and Garbage. what is this? Allah said to "Vapour heaven and Solid earth., You idiots get together and they both came together.." ?? Huh...
And Muslim robots see Black holes, houries, heavens, ORIGIN of universe and what not in such silly verses.. what is wrong with these people??? well we will add other Allah verses that "letstalk" put out for discussion..
good luck to both of you guys...
yeezevee
just for the sake of readers let us put those ayahs on table.. All are form ShakirQuran claims in 4:82 that had it not been the Book of God, there would have been a lot of contradictions in it. And there are contradictions in it. Read the following verses in contrast:
41:11 vs. 21:30
54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7
42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71
45:14 and 109:6 vs. 9:5 and 9:29
52:35 vs. 19:9 and 19:67
57:22 vs. 53:39, 44:3 and 44:4
63:5 vs. 4:107
69:35 and 69:37 vs. 37:62 to 37:66
Well, according A_B; Allah is NOT God., Allah is something else., A_B is also Not sure what it is.004.082: Do they not then meditate on the Quran? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy.
Any way let us put the verses that letstalk put out and may contradict each other..
But dear friends., All of above verses are GARBAGE. I am not sure how you guys are going to prove whether they are contradicting each other or NOT.,41:11 vs. 21:30; well that is good, Ahmed Bahgat is on chapter 41., so let us put that also here
SHAKIR's 41.011 : Then He directed Himself to the heaven and it is a vapor, so He said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said: We come willingly.
AhmedBahgat's 41.011 : Moreover He directed Himself to the heaven while it is vapour, and He said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said: We come willingly.
SHAKIR' 021.030: Do not those who disbelieve see that the heavens and the earth were closed up, but We have opened them; and We have made of water everything living, will they not then believe?
AhmedBahgat's 41.011: Have those who have disbelieved seen that the heavens and the earth were joined then We have separated them; and We have made of water every living thing. Then will they not believe?
It is just nonsense and Garbage. what is this? Allah said to "Vapour heaven and Solid earth., You idiots get together and they both came together.." ?? Huh...
And Muslim robots see Black holes, houries, heavens, ORIGIN of universe and what not in such silly verses.. what is wrong with these people??? well we will add other Allah verses that "letstalk" put out for discussion..
good luck to both of you guys...
yeezevee
- AhmedBahgat
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
yeezevee wrote:letstalk is hard on Ahmed Bahgat. letstalk is trying to pull A_B on to a debate., that is wonderfuljust for the sake of readers let us put those ayahs on table.. All are form ShakirQuran claims in 4:82 that had it not been the Book of God, there would have been a lot of contradictions in it. And there are contradictions in it. Read the following verses in contrast:
41:11 vs. 21:30
54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7
42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71
45:14 and 109:6 vs. 9:5 and 9:29
52:35 vs. 19:9 and 19:67
57:22 vs. 53:39, 44:3 and 44:4
63:5 vs. 4:107
69:35 and 69:37 vs. 37:62 to 37:66Well, according A_B; Allah is NOT God., Allah is something else., A_B is also Not sure what it is.004.082: Do they not then meditate on the Quran? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy.
Any way let us put the verses that letstalk put out and may contradict each other..But dear friends., All of above verses are GARBAGE. I am not sure how you guys are going to prove whether they are contradicting each other or NOT.,41:11 vs. 21:30; well that is good, Ahmed Bahgat is on chapter 41., so let us put that also here
SHAKIR's 41.011 : Then He directed Himself to the heaven and it is a vapor, so He said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said: We come willingly.
AhmedBahgat's 41.011 : Moreover He directed Himself to the heaven while it is vapour, and He said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said: We come willingly.
SHAKIR' 021.030: Do not those who disbelieve see that the heavens and the earth were closed up, but We have opened them; and We have made of water everything living, will they not then believe?
AhmedBahgat's 41.011: Have those who have disbelieved seen that the heavens and the earth were joined then We have separated them; and We have made of water every living thing. Then will they not believe?
It is just nonsense and Garbage. what is this? Allah said to "Vapour heaven and Solid earth., You idiots get together and they both came together.." ?? Huh...
And Muslim robots see Black holes, houries, heavens, ORIGIN of universe and what not in such silly verses.. what is wrong with these people??? well we will add other Allah verses that "letstalk" put out for discussion..
good luck to both of you guys...
yeezevee
Do you have a Quran argument or you only want a slander game?
- AhmedBahgat
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
letstalk wrote:Upon Ahmed Bahgat's request for a new thread on one on one "debate?" I am posting my first objection here:
Quran claims in 4:82 that had it not been the Book of God, there would have been a lot of contradictions in it. And there are contradictions in it. Read the following verses in contrast:
41:11 vs. 21:30
54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7
42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71
45:14 and 109:6 vs. 9:5 and 9:29
52:35 vs. 19:9 and 19:67
57:22 vs. 53:39, 44:3 and 44:4
63:5 vs. 4:107
69:35 and 69:37 vs. 37:62 to 37:66
So Quran is proving itself to be NOT FROM GOD.
Try to get yourself organised, now I need just one Quran argument at a time, so select one from the above and walk me through it USING YOUR OWN WORDS (no copy/paste), then I will have the pleasure to slam dunk it, also don't worry about the rest of your arguments, I will slam dunk all of them inshallah one at a time
cheers
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Dear Slamd... I mean Ahmed Bahgat
Where is your answer.
Still with sweet regards
Rajesh Kumar
Where is your answer.
Still with sweet regards
Rajesh Kumar
- AhmedBahgat
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
YOu are dismissed, punkletstalk wrote:Dear Slamd... I mean Ahmed Bahgat
Where is your answer.
Still with sweet regards
Rajesh Kumar
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Dear ?unk Baghat
The next time you think you can debate, kindly note that "... so long as it may concern, it will be no holds barred."
Smooch
Rajesh Kumar
The next time you think you can debate, kindly note that "... so long as it may concern, it will be no holds barred."
Smooch
Rajesh Kumar
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
well it is all مشاكس ... مشاكس .... مشاكس., No discussion and nothing to learn., Any ways I pasted Verses 41:11 & 21:30AhmedBahgat says: You are dismissed, punk
letstalk says : Smooch
Spoiler! :
I have to agree with you partially dear AhmedBahgat. It is true that there is a bit of "Slander game" & I do use that where ever it is needed., But it appears you did not (OR YOU DON'T WANT TO) see the Q'uranic argument., Please explain to the readers what is the message in those two verses?Do you have a Quran argument or you only want a slander game?
Well on the way, let me also add that contradictory verse 54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7 mentioned by letstalk., Well may be single verse is useless., then let us add few verses around "54:19 vs. 69:6 and 69:7"
So Question here again is., is there any contradiction between verses 54:19 & 69:6 ; 69:7 ??054.018:: Ad treated (the truth) as a lie, so how (great) was My punishment and My warning!
054.019 : Surely We sent on them a tornado in a day of bitter ill-luck
054.020: Tearing men away as if they were the trunks of palm-trees torn up.
054.021: How (great) was then My punishment and My warning!
069.004: Samood and Ad called the striking calamity a lie.
069.005: Then as to Samood, they were destroyed by an excessively severe punishment.
069.006: And as to Ad, they were destroyed by a roaring, violent blast.
069.007: Which He made to prevail against them for seven nights and eight days unremittingly, so that you might have seen the people therein prostrate as if they were the trunks of hollow palms.
Frankly speaking I don't see any contradiction dear letstalk., What i see is an Arabic song; what I see is silly CHILDISH chiding or warnings to people of that time specially to Jews but no contradiction. That is my view.
with best wishes to both of you
yeezevee
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Moreover??AhmedBahgat's 41.011 : Moreover He directed Himself to the heaven while it is vapour, and He said to it and to the earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said: We come willingly.
Someone else talking about Allah?
Quran miracle (16:69) : Bees eat ALL fruits
Quran miracle (27:18) : an ant SAID, "O ants, enter your dwellings that you not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they perceive not."
Quran miracle (27:18) : an ant SAID, "O ants, enter your dwellings that you not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they perceive not."
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
yeezevee, there is a difference between "one day" and "seven days and eight nights".
piscohot: hello. intro and intentions please.
piscohot: hello. intro and intentions please.
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
letstalk wrote
., but one can say that they are silly/stupid stories for children or at the best songs/sonnets for adults who speak Arabic....
*****************************************************************************************************************************
Any way let us look at other verses of you picked out on that subject dear letstalk ., that is verses 42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71 the spoiler has the verses around those three verses . Again., I don't see any contradiction between between 042.031 Vs 005.055 + 009.07., What I see is STUPIDITY and "INFUSING FEAR IN THOSE who don't believe in Muhammad and his Allah., but no contradiction dear letstalk. Correct me if i am wrong dear letstalk
any ways i wonder whether you could explain me these words in 009.071:
"And (as for) the believing men and the believing women, they are guardians of each other; they enjoin good and forbid evil and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, and obey Allah and His Messenger; (as for) these, Allah will show mercy to them; surely Allah is Mighty, Wise."
what is that and pay the poor-rate, means., Is it pay to poor and take care of them?? or someother silly stff??
with best wishes
yeezevee
well off course there is a difference between "one day" and "seven days and eight nights" ., that is true but., but still I can not see the CONTRADICTION between verses 054.019 & 069.006 -069.007 dear letstalk., let me read that againyeezevee, there is a difference between "one day" and "seven days and eight nights"
Well as a Muslim, one can say those verses are just describing some sort of war type events of Past(before the birth of Mr. Muhammad) at different times. So I say again NO CONTRADICTION lol054.019: : Surely We sent on them a tornado in a day of bitter ill-luck
& other two are saying
069.006: And as to Ad, they were destroyed by a roaring, violent blast.
069.007: Which He made to prevail against them for seven nights and eight days unremittingly, so that you might have seen the people therein prostrate as if they were the trunks of hollow palms.


*****************************************************************************************************************************
Any way let us look at other verses of you picked out on that subject dear letstalk ., that is verses 42:31 vs. 5:55 and 9:71
042.031: And you cannot escape in the earth, and you shall not have a guardian or a helper besides Allah.
005.055: Only Allah is your Vali and His Messenger and those who believe, those who keep up prayers and pay the poor-rate while they bow.
009.071: And (as for) the believing men and the believing women, they are guardians of each other; they enjoin good and forbid evil and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, and obey Allah and His Messenger; (as for) these, Allah will show mercy to them; surely Allah is Mighty, Wise.
Spoiler! :
any ways i wonder whether you could explain me these words in 009.071:
"And (as for) the believing men and the believing women, they are guardians of each other; they enjoin good and forbid evil and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, and obey Allah and His Messenger; (as for) these, Allah will show mercy to them; surely Allah is Mighty, Wise."
what is that and pay the poor-rate, means., Is it pay to poor and take care of them?? or someother silly stff??
with best wishes
yeezevee
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
dear zeezevee
if u r serious that u dont see any contradiction in these verses, i'll look for a psychiatrist who could pass u some advice on how to think logically.
with sympathy
Rajesh Kumar
if u r serious that u dont see any contradiction in these verses, i'll look for a psychiatrist who could pass u some advice on how to think logically.
with sympathy
Rajesh Kumar
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
letstalk writes
., yes i do need a psychiatrist dear letstalk., That is such a subject often psychiatrist's need help. Any way one of the goals of FFI is " to make things clear from Q'uran to those who considers "It word of God/Allah"., So you will have hard time to prove that unless you are an expert in argument. It is true that there are contradictory verses in Q'uran. But for the believer it is the word of GOD.. hence for them there is no contradiction at best you don't understand or you are taking the verse "OUT OF CONTEXT". Now it is up to you to prove and explain... lol.
So I read you at http://challenge2islam.wetpaint.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ., You are thorough with your articles and you come up with some harsh question to Muslims and you are also good in writing and on top of all that you are also quite young. Such people are rare in Islam. Hence There is so much responsibility on people like you. Your health and well being is extremely important dear letstalk. Please cool down., I know it is hard.
Any ways let me tell you a little story.,
You know In 1843 AD, The English occupied Sindh. They divided Sindh in to three parts Karachi, Hyderabad and Shikarpur. In those days Larkana was the part of Shikarpur and Dadu was part of Larkana. There was a town called Nirun-Kot. Elliot and John Dawson wrote a wonderful story on that town in their book "History of India by its own Historians" they wrote it in 1869 .. and they describe about this town. You know how Nirun-Kot became Hyderabad??
Until 1768 its name was Nirun-Kot., Mr. Ghulam Shah Kalhor., THE SAINTLY RULER OF SINDH.. renamed it after our DESERT Prophet Muhammad(PBUH's) son in-law Mr. "Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib". Apparently he was also called as "Haidar" or Haidar Ali.... So that is how Haiderabad .. or Hyderabad is born.
If we go back earlier than 1748 There is another story on that town Nirun-Kot. ., but that is for another time. For that you have to listen the sounds of Ganjo Taken and visit those BARREN HILLS.. the Ganjo Taken . Those BARREN HILLS still talk, still tell stories of past. Any ways please take care of yourself. It is very nice to talk to a person like you..
with best wishes
yeezevee
dear zeezevee
if u r serious that u dont see any contradiction in these verses, i'll look for a psychiatrist who could pass u some advice on how to think logically.
with sympathy

So I read you at http://challenge2islam.wetpaint.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ., You are thorough with your articles and you come up with some harsh question to Muslims and you are also good in writing and on top of all that you are also quite young. Such people are rare in Islam. Hence There is so much responsibility on people like you. Your health and well being is extremely important dear letstalk. Please cool down., I know it is hard.
Any ways let me tell you a little story.,
You know In 1843 AD, The English occupied Sindh. They divided Sindh in to three parts Karachi, Hyderabad and Shikarpur. In those days Larkana was the part of Shikarpur and Dadu was part of Larkana. There was a town called Nirun-Kot. Elliot and John Dawson wrote a wonderful story on that town in their book "History of India by its own Historians" they wrote it in 1869 .. and they describe about this town. You know how Nirun-Kot became Hyderabad??
Until 1768 its name was Nirun-Kot., Mr. Ghulam Shah Kalhor., THE SAINTLY RULER OF SINDH.. renamed it after our DESERT Prophet Muhammad(PBUH's) son in-law Mr. "Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib". Apparently he was also called as "Haidar" or Haidar Ali.... So that is how Haiderabad .. or Hyderabad is born.
If we go back earlier than 1748 There is another story on that town Nirun-Kot. ., but that is for another time. For that you have to listen the sounds of Ganjo Taken and visit those BARREN HILLS.. the Ganjo Taken . Those BARREN HILLS still talk, still tell stories of past. Any ways please take care of yourself. It is very nice to talk to a person like you..
with best wishes
yeezevee
Last edited by yeezevee on Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Dear yeezevee
You surprise me each time I read you. "Here, he's a Muslim... no. no he hates Islam... well, Is he a Shia?... An atheist... no but... "
You seem to have good knowledge about this part of the world. I have not yet been able to make this part Nirun-Kot again. I say "name does matter" and eversince I have left Islam, I have started hating names that come from Islamic background.
By the way, like "Alif laaaaaam meeeeeeeeem", I'm thinking of suggesting the local Molvis to "silently" include a line in the Quran called "Yee Zeeeeeeeee Veeeeeeee!!!"
Thanks for complements
Good to talk to you
Rajesh Kumar
You surprise me each time I read you. "Here, he's a Muslim... no. no he hates Islam... well, Is he a Shia?... An atheist... no but... "
You seem to have good knowledge about this part of the world. I have not yet been able to make this part Nirun-Kot again. I say "name does matter" and eversince I have left Islam, I have started hating names that come from Islamic background.
By the way, like "Alif laaaaaam meeeeeeeeem", I'm thinking of suggesting the local Molvis to "silently" include a line in the Quran called "Yee Zeeeeeeeee Veeeeeeee!!!"
Thanks for complements
Good to talk to you
Rajesh Kumar
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
dear Rajesh Kumar., dear letstalk ., I like everything from your posts NOT THOSE HIGHLIGHTED WORDS.., Hate is NOT good., it doesn't help., Its hurtful to self. It often hurts more the person who is hating than those whom he/she hates. So please think it over..Dear yeezevee
You surprise me each time I read you. "Here, he's a Muslim... no. no he hates Islam... well, Is he a Shia?... An atheist... no but... "
You seem to have good knowledge about this part of the world. I have not yet been able to make this part Nirun-Kot again. I say "name does matter" and eversince I have left Islam, I have started hating names that come from Islamic background.
By the way, like "Alif laaaaaam meeeeeeeeem", I'm thinking of suggesting the local Molvis to "silently" include a line in the Quran called "Yee Zeeeeeeeee Veeeeeeee!!!"
Thanks for complements
Oh common., there is plenty to talk., so in fact it is other way around..Good to talk to you
Rajesh Kumar
with best wishes
yeezevee
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Dear yeezevee
Only when I hate Islam will I try to bring people out of it. I cannot say I love all diseases. I cannot say I love terrorism. I cannot say I love inflation and unemployment. However, I admit I was wrong at saying I hate "names" that come from Islamic background because "names" only represent objects and ideas.
As far as talking to you is concerned, I do like it and we will talk much more. But each time you'll need to swallow, "good to talk to you"!!!
Cheers and regards
Rajesh Kumar
Only when I hate Islam will I try to bring people out of it. I cannot say I love all diseases. I cannot say I love terrorism. I cannot say I love inflation and unemployment. However, I admit I was wrong at saying I hate "names" that come from Islamic background because "names" only represent objects and ideas.
As far as talking to you is concerned, I do like it and we will talk much more. But each time you'll need to swallow, "good to talk to you"!!!
Cheers and regards
Rajesh Kumar
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:06 am
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
rajesh wrote a usual stupid stuff
yeez explained in detail
ahmed accuses
then he answers answers beautifully to rajesh
Try to get yourself organised, now I need just one Quran argument at a time, so select one from the above and walk me through it USING YOUR OWN WORDS (no copy/paste), then I will have the pleasure to slam dunk it, also don't worry about the rest of your arguments, I will slam dunk all of them inshallah one at a time
lol,( i am always a happy man , i love to laugh)
ahmed asks rajesh to translate quran of his own! , wow
for this rajesh asks ahmed
for this ahmed says
real beauty ,wow again
YOu are dismissed, punk
in other words ahmed accepts defeat or since rajesh could not give his own translation ahmed is out
since the later one is really foolish , so we should accept the first one
ahmed accepts defeat !
AND RAJESH IS GLAD
SO HE SAYS
but yeez is a good guy , cos he cannot disappoint rajesh , he takes the thread forward
dear dear dear
is this a kind of game or what
i am beginning to feel i am wasting time here
it is as if as they say in urdu
mi maara sarka martu , tu rooya sarka roo
meaning
i will act as if i am hitting you
you act as if you are crying
good luck
Mushtaq
Spoiler! :
Spoiler! :
Spoiler! :
Try to get yourself organised, now I need just one Quran argument at a time, so select one from the above and walk me through it USING YOUR OWN WORDS (no copy/paste), then I will have the pleasure to slam dunk it, also don't worry about the rest of your arguments, I will slam dunk all of them inshallah one at a time
lol,( i am always a happy man , i love to laugh)
ahmed asks rajesh to translate quran of his own! , wow
for this rajesh asks ahmed
Spoiler! :
real beauty ,wow again
YOu are dismissed, punk
in other words ahmed accepts defeat or since rajesh could not give his own translation ahmed is out
since the later one is really foolish , so we should accept the first one
ahmed accepts defeat !
AND RAJESH IS GLAD
SO HE SAYS
Spoiler! :
but yeez is a good guy , cos he cannot disappoint rajesh , he takes the thread forward
dear dear dear
is this a kind of game or what
i am beginning to feel i am wasting time here
it is as if as they say in urdu
mi maara sarka martu , tu rooya sarka roo
meaning
i will act as if i am hitting you
you act as if you are crying
good luck
Mushtaq
- AhmedBahgat
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
parvez mushtaq wrote:rajesh wrote a usual stupid stuffyeez explained in detailSpoiler! :ahmed accusesSpoiler! :
then he answers answers beautifully to rajeshSpoiler! :
Try to get yourself organised, now I need just one Quran argument at a time, so select one from the above and walk me through it USING YOUR OWN WORDS (no copy/paste), then I will have the pleasure to slam dunk it, also don't worry about the rest of your arguments, I will slam dunk all of them inshallah one at a time
lol,( i am always a happy man , i love to laugh)
ahmed asks rajesh to translate quran of his own! , wow
for this rajesh asks ahmed
for this ahmed saysSpoiler! :
real beauty ,wow again
YOu are dismissed, punk
in other words ahmed accepts defeat or since rajesh could not give his own translation ahmed is out
since the later one is really foolish , so we should accept the first one
ahmed accepts defeat !
AND RAJESH IS GLAD
SO HE SAYS
Spoiler! :
but yeez is a good guy , cos he cannot disappoint rajesh , he takes the thread forward
dear dear dear
is this a kind of game or what
i am beginning to feel i am wasting time here
it is as if as they say in urdu
mi maara sarka martu , tu rooya sarka roo
meaning
i will act as if i am hitting you
you act as if you are crying
good luck
Mushtaq
Mister Pervert Mushrik
How ignorant you are?
I had a long dialogue with that prick in PMs, and based on that I dismissed him,
Don't you know that I don't deal with jerks, mister?
Well, I always get questions from Kafirs on my PM, actually yesterday a Kafir asked me to translate two verses for him/her, and I translated the whole sura for him/her, therefore I am the sole decision maker to whom I should dialogue with and whom should I dismiss
You filthy mushrik wants to interpret it as accepting defeat, I really careless, you may keep it itchy with him
Salam
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
What the hell is that dear Ahmed ? Go to sleep and here is recommended link http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/ ... w_dash.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; How to eat good food to lower blood pressure. Reading that will help you and your near & dear..Mister Pervert Mushrik
How ignornat (IGNORANT)you are?
I had a long dialogue with that prock (PRICK)in PMs, and based on that I dismissed him,
Don't you know that I don't deal with jerks, mister?
Well, I always get questions from Kafirs on my PM, actually yetrtstdau(YESTERDAY) a Kafir asked me to translate two verses for him/her, and I translated the whole sura for her, therefore I am the sole decision maker to whom I shold dialogue with
You filthy mushrik wants to intrpret(INTERPRET) it as acceolting(ACCEPTING) defeat, I really careless,(CARE LESS) you may keep it itchy with him
Salam
yeezevee
- AhmedBahgat
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:38 am
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Rajesh vs. Ahmed Bahgat
Yekee, read my comment above again and you should see that all typos were fixed, again you punk, I don't care if you make fun of my spelling, you may keep it ithcy along with themyeezevee wrote:What the hell is that dear Ahmed ? Go to sleep and here is recommended link http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/ ... w_dash.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; How to eat good food to lower blood pressure. Reading that will help you and your near & dear..Mister Pervert Mushrik
How ignornat (IGNORANT)you are?
I had a long dialogue with that prock (PRICK)in PMs, and based on that I dismissed him,
Don't you know that I don't deal with jerks, mister?
Well, I always get questions from Kafirs on my PM, actually yetrtstdau(YESTERDAY) a Kafir asked me to translate two verses for him/her, and I translated the whole sura for her, therefore I am the sole decision maker to whom I shold dialogue with
You filthy mushrik wants to intrpret(INTERPRET) it as acceolting(ACCEPTING) defeat, I really careless,(CARE LESS) you may keep it itchy with him
Salam
yeezevee