How fools you are? All Muslims understand what is meant.. pillars of faith.manfred wrote:OK, so for you, there has to be be an obvious link to the Qur'an. The last time by the way, you did not say Qur'an you said "pillars of faith" which is entirely different.
Still asking the same old questions, Hadiths and the Gospels both were written-collected by men, and are based on the oral transmission and hearsay. About the hadiths, Muslims know who actually collected the Hadiths, and they know who passed them on, and who actually made the original statement that was passed on, when compared to the Gospels, Christians literally don’t know who was passing the stories, they’re all anonymous.Does that mean ALL hadith that do not say the same thing as some verse in the Qur'an are rejected by you? Then why have hadith at all?
Islam haters want to teach me about Muhammad. I know who the real Muhammad, Jesus and Moses more than you.Or do you mean there has to be some tentative connection only? Then how does that amount to evidence of reliability?
Are not merely inventing a rule for yourself designed not to discover the truth, the facts, the best way we can know them, but instead helping you to to avoid facing up to uncomfortable things known about Mohammed?
As I said, you are poor debater and always inconsistent...Stick to the topic.Let me give you an example: The Qur'an mentions lashings as a punishment for zina. There is no differentiation between married or unmarried people in the Qur'an. Shariah takes a very different line, based on Mohammed's actions. The reports about what Mohammed actually did are from the same sources as many hadith.
As I have said many times, you really have a lot of lack of knowledge and understanding of Islam. You think the teachings of Islam like Christianity.So in effect we actually have an example of Mohammed which is not the same as the instructions in the Qur'an. Which then would be your guideline?