The Vairant Quran Channel
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=18970" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMa5tqfdNzw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmUEub1O5FU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So Muslims, Where Exactly is the Rasm Manuscript?
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=18953" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfgV9cNf1vc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Cornered Muslim Scholar finally admits Quran has changed.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=18931" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6agQmo5OTc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
THE Qur'an dates from 1924
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=18888" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRkUDjF1RfE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As I already explained there is nothing wrong with the text of the quran, why not? It is because the quran has been preserved by God through mankind themselves. All this can be clearly proved from the very existing copies of the quran themselves.
The quran we have it today has come to us through two completely independent channels. A)Through channel of HUFFAAZ ie the people who had committed the whole of the quran to their memories and B)through scribes of the quranic text who copied the text of quran from the copies of the quran.
The quran we have in written form was not written down from the memory of people because there is zero evidence for that. Likewise the quran we have in minds of huffaaz was not committed to memory from its written form because there is zero evidence for that also. This is why both means of transmission of the quranic message were fully independent of each other. However they both could help us check them against each other to a great degree to verify that the quran we have today is original ie nothing added or taken away from it.
First of all look at the writing style of the original copies of the quran we have available worldwide. One will see that they do not have wovel marks nor the symbols for individual letters. For example, in ancient writing the quranic text clearly shows that same symbol has been used for more than one letter ie letters BAA, TAA, SAA and NUN are not distinguished by dots as they are now. Or that JEEM, HAA and KHAA use the very same symbol to represent them. The case is very same for DAAL and ZAAL or RAA and ZAA or SEEN and SHEEN or SWAD and DWAD or TWAA and ZWAA or AIN and GHAIN or FAA and QAAF or LAAM and YAA. Any text written even today like that cannot be read by anyone unless one was already familiar with the message written in that text. The question is, could anyone commit from such a text its message? This clearly proves that the quran was not memorised by HUFFAAZ from any written text of the quran.
The next question is, could the quran be written down from the memories of people who have committed it to their memories? My answer is no, not at all. Why not? Because the information the quranic message contains is such that copiers of this information will become confused as to how to write it down properly because there are different ways of writing the very same information down. To help people understand my point here let me try and explain it a bit. We know that we can write a number with a symbol or figure or shape as well as in a word form ie I can write 2 or two. So how will anyone know whether to use a figure or word for a number? This is why some will write a figure and others will use word. No such quranic copies exist in the word which contain such information. They are all the very same in this regard.
The other thing the quran uses is letters and words, For example, in the beginning of some surahs one will see some letter based combinations like 2/1 in the quran which starts with A, L and M. These letters are also meaningful words. When one says ALIF, LAAM, MEEM what is the listener suppose to write down for these letters? A, l, m or ALIF, LAAM , MEEM? Then we have words in Arabic language which have come into it from other languages and therefore they could be written down in various ways by using different letters. Not only that but some arabic words can also be written using different letters eg for some words letters SEEN and SWAD can be interchanged and like some other letters. So the question arises, which way these words should be written? So one can see if each person wrote the quran down from one's memory alone then what ought to happen? That is each person will end up writing it down the way one thinks and then there will be as many versions of the copies of the quran as many the writers of the quranic copies. Do we see in the existing copies of the quran anything like this? No, not atb all. What does that tell us? It tells us, each and every copy of the quran that exists in the word today is copied directly from another already existing written copy of the quran, otherwise the variations I have pointed out could not be avoided. Even then the message of the quran ought to remain the very same. That is because writing three in word form or in figure 3 form makes no difference.
These points clearly show the quran was not committed to memory from the written copies of the quran nor it was copied down from the memory into writing rather the quran came to us in two independently verifiable ways. This is all true but then the question arises why do copies of the quran differ with each other? It is because God and humanity both are partners in the process of preservation of the quranic text. God makes no mistakes but human beings do. However God has made people capable of detecting their human errors and to mend or correct them. So the promise of God that he has preserved the quran stands true even today. Fact is people made errors during copying the quranic text. Fact is, it is people who have detected the errors made by people. The fact is people also have been correcting the errors they made, so there is no problem with the quranic text even in this regard. Why not?
Let me try and explain it a bit. We human beings know very well that no matter how hard we try we do end up making errors or mistakes when we write down things. However we can also detect our errors. How do we do that? We know error due to their characteristics or features or properties or nature. For example, we may add letters or words or phrases to a text by mistake or we may leave out letters or words or phrases from a text. We may end up adding a piece of information where it does not belong or omit a piece of information from its place. Likewise when it comes to book binding we may end up leaving pages out of a copy of a book or put extra pages in and thereby double some pages in a copy of a book. So there are different ways we end up with making errors. However errors are detectable and correctable. Human errors are not intentional or deliberate so they cannot hide or remain undetected or hidden from everyone forever. No matter what such errors make absolutely no difference to the validity or genuineness of the text when its original form is recreate-able from its other existing or available copies.
So people who are relying on reports in hadis or history books regarding the quran need to reconsider their position and not rely on them because in the face of the clear proof they prove to be faulty or defective. This is why they cannot be used against the quran. However reports that in line with the quran are fine. So my picking and choosing from hadis books or history books in this regard is 100% reliable. So people who try to justify multiple readings of the quranic text are also wrong. There is only and only one correct reading of the quranic text and that is it. Scholars of the quran regardless they are Muslims are nonmuslims must avoid false propaganda against the quran because it is not damaging the quran but humanity by hands of each other.