The proof around me is not at all sufficient to convince me about existence of GOD. I have already discussed with some believers here. Can you tell me why your so called GOD makes someone a mentally retarded person ? The retarded person is simply left to suffer in this world even when there is no fault of his. World doesnt respect such people .ITs throws them away like you throw waste in a bin. Why create such a person in the first place ? Only to make him suffer ?iffo wrote:I don't have to prove existance of God. You look around you will see prove every where. All theskynightblaze
I am an atheist and I dont even in believe in GOD so forget about using arguments like he is beyond our understanding.Why should anyone believe in nature of GOD(like beyond our understanding) when he doesnt even believe in GOD? YOu are yet to prove existence of GOD and even before proving that you are using argument about his nature? GOd exists and is beyond understanding is your belief and its not universally accepted or proven fact which you can use in a debate . The question about nature of entity comes only after you prove first that it exists. You therefore cannot use the argument of nature unless you prove first that GOD exists . Once you prove that GOD exists you again have to prove that human logic cannot apply to him otherwise its just your opinion or belief or an assumption
things and systems do not evolve on their own. You look at yourself, your senses, your body(This magnificent machinery can not evolve on its own) that is prove enough. . Its you who need to prove that everything can evolve on its own. When you have a proof let me know. All you need little common sense and less stuborness
Another example is making someone born in a family for whom having food once a day is a luxury Food is a primary need of any human. Can you call such a insane entity as GOD? Right from the birth discrimination is made. I cannot possibly respect such a moronic entity. Even I would be kind and act mercifully. In short evidence around you also leads one to conclusion that there cannot exist an entity such as GOD though sometimes it may make you feel that it may exist.So your point that evidence around me makes me reach a conclusion that GOD exists is not correct.It also sends the wrong signals.
You claim that GOD exists and when asked for proof you use a logic that you discard when it backfires against you.You need to prove that GOD is an exception to the logic you used . When asked why cant the same logic be applied to GOD your answer is he is beyond understanding and that we cant apply human logic to GOD. IS this a universally accepted fact ? I hope you agree with me that only facts can be used in a debate to prove something. This is no way an established or proven fact so what you are doing here is you are supporting your logic with yet another assumption or a belief that you hold.You can support your argument using only facts .So you are supposed to prove as to why GOD is an exception to the logic of yours by providing evidence / proofs/facts and not some of your beliefs.Also my previous post holds true. You havent answered my questions.